rsn | Last September, as the prospects for a U.S. military
strike against Syria were fading thanks to Putin, NED president Carl
Gershman, who is something of a neocon paymaster controlling more than
$100 million in congressionally approved funding each year, took to the
pages of the neocon-flagship Washington Post and wrote that Ukraine was now “the biggest prize.”
But Gershman added that Ukraine was really only an
interim step to an even bigger prize, the removal of the strong-willed
and independent-minded Putin, who, Gershman added, “may find himself on
the losing end not just in the near abroad [i.e. Ukraine] but within
Russia itself.” In other words, the new hope was for “regime change” in
Kiev and Moscow.
Putin had made himself a major annoyance in Neocon
World, particularly with his diplomacy on Syria that defused a crisis
over a Sarin attack outside Damascus on Aug. 21, 2013. Despite the
attack’s mysterious origins – and the absence of any clear evidence
proving the Syrian government’s guilt – the U.S. State Department and
the U.S. news media rushed to the judgment that Syrian President Bashar
al-Assad did it.
Politicians and pundits baited Obama with claims that
Assad had brazenly crossed Obama’s “red line” by using chemical weapons
and that U.S. “credibility” now demanded military retaliation. A
longtime Israeli/neocon goal, “regime change” in Syria, seemed within
reach.
But Putin brokered a deal in which Assad agreed to
surrender Syria’s chemical weapons arsenal (even as he continued to deny
any role in the Sarin attack). The arrangement was a huge letdown for
the neocons and Israeli officials who had been drooling over the
prospect that a U.S. bombing campaign would bring Assad to his knees and
deliver a strategic blow against Iran, Israel’s current chief enemy.
Putin then further offended the neocons and the
Israeli government by helping to facilitate an interim nuclear deal with
Iran, making another neocon/Israeli priority, a U.S. war against Iran,
less likely.
So, the troublesome Putin had to be put in play. And,
NED’s Gershman was quick to note a key Russian vulnerability,
neighboring Ukraine, where a democratically elected but corrupt
president, Viktor Yanukovych, was struggling with a terrible economy and
weighing whether to accept a European aid offer, which came with many
austerity strings attached, or work out a more generous deal with
Russia.
0 comments:
Post a Comment