futurism | Congressman Eric Burlison (R-MO) has waded into the discourse about
UFOs — and in an outburst that probably says more about the state of US
politics than unidentified objects in the sky, speculated that they
might be "angels" sent by God himself.
Yes, you read that right. During a recent episode of That UFO Podcast this week, Burlison took the UFO conversation in a wild new direction.
"They
may not fit exactly the Biblical narrative, but whenever I use the term
'angels,'" he said, "to me, it's synonymous with an extradimensional
being."
"I think it's more likely that it would be something extradimensional
than it would be within this dimension," Burlison argued. "And then, so
what I'll say is that when you start talking about things in that
nature, that they're extradimensional, well, in a lot of different
scriptures, including the Bible, and others, that's really the way that
you describe messengers of God or, you know, angels."
Strikingly,
Burlison's musings come after he attended a classified briefing about
UFOs this month, though he said after it that nothing he'd learned there
had fundamentally shifted his worldview.
"There’s nothing that’s been said that’s changed my worldview," he told the Kansas City Star.
"I believe the veracity of the claims of the people who testified in
the public hearing. Now, that being said, I believe that what they
believe they said is true."
Burlison isn't alone in musing about a connection between UFOs and religious texts.
"UFOs were in the Bible," representative Tim Burchett (R-TN) claimed
in 2021. "Read Ezekiel, it talks about the wheel flying around. So I
mean, they’ve been around since we’ve been around and somebody needs to
come up with some answers."
Burlison has long called for oversight
over reports alleging that the US government has conspired to keep
spicy UFO findings from leaking to the public.
The subject has
been fraught with drama. Last summer, an Air Force veteran and former
member of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency named David Grusch
came forward
to allege that the government had secretly recovered alien spacecraft —
and even dead "pilots" inside them — for decades as part of a
top-secret UFO retrieval program.
thehill | According to philosopher Nick Bostrom, a novel technological
discovery may one day devastate human civilization. In Bostrom’s
“vulnerable world” theory,
only extraordinary interventions — such as unprecedented global
cooperation or surveillance — can prevent a sufficiently dangerous new
technology from ushering in civilizational collapse.
With key members of Congress suspecting that the U.S. already possesses such uniquely destabilizing technology, Bostrom’s hypothesis may soon be put to the test.
Legislation proposed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and a bipartisan group of five other senators alleges that surreptitious government “legacy programs” have retrieved and are attempting to reverse-engineer UFOs of seemingly “non-human” origin. Although an influential member of the House successfully “killed” the most remarkable elements of the legislation late last year, Schumer and his Republican counterpart are not backing down.
At this juncture, leaving the plausible global implications of such a
paradigm-shifting revelation unaddressed is irresponsible and, as
Bostrom might argue, dangerous.
Let us assume, then, that the U.S. does indeed possess revolutionary UFO technology.
A popular assumption holds that any official disclosure that humanity
is not alone will unite the nations of the world by default. But this
is by no means guaranteed.
On the contrary, a sudden public revelation that the U.S. possesses
inconceivably advanced technology could be a uniquely destabilizing
event.
China’s military, for example, relies heavily on espionage and the emulation of U.S. technology. Russia’s defense industry is in shambles, compounded by staggering losses
in Ukraine. These nuclear-armed states would naturally fear the sudden
injection of highly advanced UFO technology into a comparatively mature,
sophisticated American industrial base for technical analysis and exploitation.
Russia or China would thus be motivated to engage in a range of
destabilizing actions to hedge against the U.S. attaining an
insurmountable strategic advantage. More worryingly, such states may
seek to actively prevent the U.S. from developing paradigm-shifting
military capabilities derived from UFO technology.
In this unstable geopolitical environment, several plausible scenarios could escalate rapidly into a devasting global conflict.
To complicate matters, key senators appear to suspect that some of America’s adversaries have also retrieved highly advanced UFO technology. Three military and intelligence officials, including Grusch, have alleged as much.
If true, the public disclosure of UFO technology by one state could ignite an arms race unparalleled in human history.
breakingdefense | Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks has signed off on a new classification
policy for space programs that discourages the use of Special Access
Program status (SAPs) that dramatically limits clearances to handful of
US officials — in hopes of opening still-secret programs to more
stakeholders, including US allies and industry partners, according to a
senior official.
“What the classification memo does, generally, is it overwrites — it
really completely rewrites — a legacy document that had its roots 20
years ago, and it’s just no longer applicable to the current environment
that involves national security space,” DoD Assistant Secretary for
Space Policy John Plumb told reporters today.
While the specifics of the policy, signed off by Hicks “at the end of
2023,” are themselves classified, Plumb explained that a key issue has
been the overuse of SAPs that not only have limited the ability to share
with allies and industry, but even among different organizations within
the Defense Department.
“So, anything we can bring from a SAP level to a Top Secret level for
example, brings massive value to the warfighter, massive value to the
department, and frankly, my hope is over time [it] will also allow us to
share more information with allies and partners that they might not
currently be able to share.”
Plumb explained that from now on DoD will be “assigning minimum
classifications to a various number of things, which will then allow the
services to examine their own programs and determine ‘should this
really be SAP-ed any more?’ And the general point that I have made clear
is policy is not a reason, it’s not the only reason, to hide something
in a SAP program. There have to be technical aspects to it.”
National security space leaders within the Pentagon and outside experts for years
have been pushing to lower the sky-high classification levels
traditionally applied to all things military space. This has included a
call for declassifying information about DoD’s plans for conducting warfighting in space — but this new policy document does not do that, Plumb said.
“Inside the beltway, people always ask me about how can I make things
unclassified? And that is not actually a thing I’m all that concerned
about. I’m concerned about reducing the classification of things where
they are over-classified to the point that it hampers our ability to get
work done or hamper the ability of the warfighter to do their mission,”
he said.
Plumb acknowledged that it will take time for the new approach to
work its way down through the bureaucracy and be accepted, but said at
the same time there are “many folks looking forward to getting started
on it.”
He further noted that he will be “briefing some close allies and partners on these changes” in future.
The new classification policy is in essence a first step in an
overarching effort by Plumb’s office to craft a new “DoD International
Space Cooperation Strategy,” designed to support the ability of the US,
allies and partners to more seamlessly undertake collective military
space operations.
Plumb noted that already the Pentagon expanded the “Combined Space Operations Initiative (CSpO)”
from seven members — Australia, Canada, France, Germany, New Zealand,
the United Kingdom and the United States — to 10. At the CSpO’s last
meeting in early December, DoD announced that Italy, Japan and Norway had now been admitted.
Ep. 51 It’s becoming obvious that the US government has made contact with nonhuman beings. So why are they lying to us about it? We asked UFO whistleblower Dave Grusch. pic.twitter.com/IP1dV29KnI
I know @RepMikeTurner has been catching much of the flak for spearheading the watering down of the UAPDA, but a special mention must be made to my home state’s 4th district Rep and HPSCI ranking member @jahimes for also reportedly running around during the NDAA conference committee and making last minute efforts to lobby for removal of the most important enforcement and oversight provisions from the original Schumer-Rounds amendment. Thanks to @ChrisUKSharp and his investigative journalism for that anecdote.
People need to understand it wasn’t just the NatSec wing of House Republicans that sunk the UAPDA. I myself am a registered Democrat who is informed on this topic and has found common cause with many Republicans to want to see transparency. Publicly playing coy with and seeming hopelessly mystified by the topic of UAP on late night shows, while quietly thumbing the scale behind the scenes like this will not be looked upon kindly.
To whatever staffer of @jahimes is tasked with managing his Twitter account, make no mistake—people with the knowledge and agency to make noise about this issue know what happened here"
The Book of Enoch is an ancient text attributed to Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah. It is divided into five main sections. The first section, the Book of the Watchers, describes the fall of a group of angels who descend to Earth and engage in sinful behavior, teaching forbidden knowledge to humanity. Enoch is appointed as a messenger to the fallen angels, warning them of their impending judgment.
The second section, the Book of Parables, contains apocalyptic visions given to Enoch. These visions include prophecies of the final judgment, the coming of the Messiah, and the establishment of a new and righteous kingdom.
The third section, the Book of Astronomy, presents a detailed account of the movements of the heavenly bodies and their significance in the ordering of the universe.
The fourth section, the Book of Dream Visions, features Enoch's visions of the future, including the fate of the righteous and the wicked.
The fifth section, the Epistle of Enoch, describes Enoch's teachings to his sons, emphasizing the importance of righteousness, repentance, and the fear of God.
Overall, The Book of Enoch provides insights into angelology, cosmology, and eschatology, and it is considered a valuable text for understanding ancient Jewish and Christian traditions.
There are a lot of books of the canonical Bible she could’ve used here, but she chose The Book of Enoch? I think she’s hunting at something.
dailymail | Sources who spoke to DailyMail.com shed
light on how the CIA has allegedly coordinated the secret recovery and
storage of these alleged crashed or landed UFOs.
Late CIA expert Jeffrey Richelson
wrote in his 2016 book, The US Intelligence Community, that the Office
of Global Access helped provide 'worldwide collection capability'
'There's
at least nine vehicles. There were different circumstances for
different ones,' one source briefed by UFO program insiders told
DailyMail.com. 'It has to do with the physical condition they're in. If
it crashes, there's a lot of damage done. Others, two of them, are
completely intact.'
The source said the
CIA has a 'system in place that can discern UFOs while they're still
cloaked,' and that if the 'non-human' craft land, crash or are brought
down to earth, special military units are sent to try to salvage the
wreckage.
Another source with knowledge
of the OGA's role said that they specialize in allowing the US military
to secretly access areas around the world where they would usually be
'denied' – for example behind enemy lines.
'They
are basically a facilitator for people to get in and out of countries,'
the source said. 'They are very clever at being able to get anywhere in
the world they want to.'
Multiple
sources briefed on the OGA's activities told DailyMail.com that most of
its operations involve more conventional retrieval missions, such as
stray nuclear weapons, downed satellites or adversaries' technology.
But they claimed some missions coordinated by the OGA have involved retrieval of UFOs.
'The
task at hand is simply to get it into custody and protect the secrecy
of it,' one source said. 'The actual physical retrieval is by the
military. But it's not kept under military control, because they have to
keep too many records. So they start moving it out fairly quickly into
private hands.'
Documents published by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)
in December 2016 showed that the OGA was one of 56 offices in the CIA,
with its chief and deputy making up two of a total 286 director-level
officials in the spy agency.
An
unclassified organizational chart published by the CIA in October 2015
lists the OGA among nine offices in the 'Science and Technology' wing of
the agency.
Late CIA expert Jeffrey Richelson wrote in a 2016 book
on the agency that the OGA was established in 2003, and cited a CIA
description that it 'integrate[s] analysis, technology, and tradecraft
to attack the most difficult targets, and to provide worldwide
collection capability.'
Wolfe's
bio cryptically adds that he 'was responsible for leading and managing
strategic, unwarned access programs that deliver intelligence from the
most challenging denied areas' and 'served as program manager with
responsibility for the end-to-end system acquisition of an innovative
new source and method for the IC [Intelligence Community].'
Two
sources told DailyMail.com that the OGA coordinates with Special
Operations Forces such as SEAL teams or Delta Force under the Pentagon's
Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), or nuclear weapons experts
such as the Nuclear Emergency Support Team (NEST), to collect the
crashed or landed craft.
But another
source, who has briefed members of Congress on alleged crash retrievals,
said that NEST had not been involved in any of these operations.
A spokesperson for the agency also denied involvement.
'[NEST]
personnel encounter materials from unknown origins on a regular basis,'
a spokesperson said. 'In fact, one of NEST's missions is to help
determine the origin of nuclear material interdicted outside of
regulatory control or used in a nuclear device.
'During its operations, NEST has never encountered any material related to UAP.'
In a written statement, a JSOC spokesperson told DailyMail.com: 'We have nothing for you on this.'
A
former SEAL team member told DailyMail.com that they had been on
operations coordinated by the CIA to retrieve high-value stray enemy
weapons, and that they knew of colleagues who had been on similar
operations where they recovered technology that appeared highly advanced
– though not necessarily out-of-this-world.
'Absolutely that happens,' the ex-SEAL said. 'Even ordinance or a weapon that we've never seen, we recover and bring it back.'
One
source said that the Air Force Special Operations Command's 24th
Special Tactics Squadron, based at Pope Field Army Airbase in North
Carolina, has also been involved in securing areas for UFO crash
retrievals.
Sources said the CIA office
then often hands the wreckage or material over to private aerospace
contractors for analysis, where it is not subject to rigorous government
audits and can be shielded with protections for trade secrets.
'The
CIA is the portfolio manager or owner of the UAP [Unidentified
Anomalous Phenomena] crash retrieval operation,' one source, who has
shared their information with Congress, told DailyMail.com.
'The
Department of Energy national labs are materials analysis contractors
whenever recovered radioisotopes are involved but not always just
radioisotope materials. The aerospace-defense industry are also
contractors that specifically do not handle any recovered radioisotopes,
but they handle the other non-radioactive material – and intact craft.'
Today, I sent my colleagues my plan for the final work period of the first session of the 118th Congress—including negotiations on long-term government funding, the national security supplemental, the NDAA and other bipartisan legislation. pic.twitter.com/o78jRJTvpe
Apparently the NDAA wasn't being voted
on yesterday as congress wasn't in session. The staffer for Turner hasn't
heard of any discussions about the bill so that is curious.
I am now going to be calling the republicans but
would appreciate more help in doing so. Be respectful with the people
taking the calls. You can find the numbers for both Republicans and
Democrats here: https://www.uapcaucus.com/call#call
Four Republicans are colluding to
block this amendment from passing: Mike Turner of Ohio, Mike Rogers of
Alabama, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and Mike Johnson of Louisiana:
Rep Mike Turner: (202) 225-6465
Rep Mike Rogers: (202) 224-3261
Sen Mitch McConnell: (202) 224-3135
Rep Mike Johnson: (202) 225-2777
My call notes:
I’m
calling about the UAP Disclosure Act, which enables Americans to get
transparency and accountability on matters related to UAPs. I've been
closely following the developments in this area, especially after the
July 26 UAP Hearing, where credible witnesses provided testimony under
oath.
I’ve
heard that X is not in favor of the UAP Disclosure Act amendment to the
NDAA because AARO is still funded, and they say this will be
duplicative funding, but it is not. Without AARO, there is no
centralized place that will handle these programs; its entire purpose is
funding authorization for UAP programs. At the same time, AARO is
currently toothless without the UAP Disclosure Act amendment. All pieces
of this amendment are critical to its functionality, including a
civilian review board to help ensure accountability.
This
is a bipartisan issue; the number of people who care about this issue
are growing, and know that it is the number one most important issue.
The DOD can never pass their audits and these SAPs could be the reason
why. If X cares about appropriate fiscal spending, then it’s imperative
to support this amendment (while keeping funding for AARO intact).
ttbrown | First Joe Rogan, now David Grusch. Ol’ TTB does seem to be getting around these days…
By now you have probably heard of David Grusch, the former military intelligence officer who testified before Congress on the U.S. Government’s secret UFO – oh, excuse me, we’re supposed to call them unidentified aerial phenomena
now – initiatives. His appearance and subsequent notoriety has caused
quite a stir, though it’s not clear the testimony shed any really clear,
fresh light on what’s been happening off the public record for the past
80 years.
The centerpiece of this production is a series of conversations with
David Grusch, the military/intelligence veteran who testified before
Congress in July about what the U.S. has been keeping under wraps about
UFOs, crash retrievals and recovered (i.e. dead) alien ‘biologics.’
I really don’t know what to make of Grusch. I don’t doubt the
veracity of his testimony, but it seems to me he goes right the edge of
new revelations without really getting there.He
is billed as a “whistleblower” but I keep getting the impression of guy
who puts the whistle in his mouth but for whatever reason doesn’t quite
blow on it.I get that he
is constrained by external forces and NDA commitments, but too much of
the discussion between he and Jesse (and Jesse’s crew) dwells on pure
speculation.
On the
other hand, that speculation is quite comprehensive. In the course of
two hours they manage to cover just about every possibility re: what the
hell is really going on out-and-up there.Extraterrestrial visitors?Top secret domestic (or foreign) military research?Time travelers?Take your pick – or maybe it’s all of the above.
About
46 minutes in, Jesse neatly segues into a discussion of Townsend Brown
and how his story dovetails into the mysteries David Grusch has exposed.Jesse has graciously given me permission to extract that portion of the documentary, so here’s that segment:
theguardian | On January 31 2003, less than 24 hours before the Columbia space shuttle broke up, Nasa announced that it would no longer be funding its Breakthrough Physics Propulsion Programme - the world's largest visible antigravity project.
A working antigravity technology is still decades away at least, but the origins of one of the most promising branches of research can be found in an Ohio garage, almost 100 years ago.
Thomas Townsend Brown was born in Ohio in1905, two years after the Wright brothers took off. By his teens he was already dreaming about space travel, tinkering in his parents' garage with the ideas that would obsess him for the rest of his life. One day, while experimenting with X-ray tubes, he applied a high voltage electrical charge to a capacitor (a device for storing electricity) attached to a glass tube suspended from the ceiling. To Brown's astonishment, the tube began to rotate, apparently propelled by electricity itself.
Aged 18, Brown was taken under the wing of Dr
Paul Biefield, a close friend and colleague of Albert Einstein. Biefield
was deeply impressed with Brown's discoveries and together they
proposed the Biefield-Brown effect. This states that when an electrical
current is applied to a capacitor, it will move in the direction of the
flow of current - towards its positive pole. And so the fledgling field
of electrogravitics was born.
By the early
1950s, Brown had developed platforms, three feet in diameter, which he
is said to have demonstrated hovering and rotating. The American
military classified the results, but they neglected to support Brown's
research. This proved to be the story of his life. Brown never got the
funding he wanted, but he continued to develop his ideas until his death
in 1985.
But the story continues in the
research of groups exploring electrogravitics, among them Boeing, Nasa
and BAe Systems. Closest to Brown's original vision are the "Lifters"
being built by American Antigravity and others - skeletal metal frames
that can lift a pound in weight, propelled by electric currents. Thomas
Townsend Brown's name may be forgotten, but his dream lives on.
12:00 onwards - Grusch outlines that leakers are under penalty of imprisonment and execution.
16:50
onward “non human Biologics” he stated in an interview previously
they’re pilots and he doesn’t know what their actual job was. They were
“nonhuman intelligence” pilots.
18:00 onward he was cleared by the Pentagon to talk about this.
19:00
onward Grusch insinuates that the initial reasoning for hiding the
information was the ontological shock it would cause in society due to
society’s religiousness at the time, along with concealing the
information from adversaries like Russia.
20:40
onward - the officials involved in the Manhattan Project also created
the laws related to obfuscation and secrecy of the topic. 21:28 -
retrieved UAP materials that give off radiation are classified under the
Atomic Energy Act (intentionally).
23:00
onward - there was a deeper classified project (related to the
Manhattan Project) studying UFOs aside from Project Blue Book
28:00
onward- Grusch states that it’s hard to tell how far ahead their (the
nonhuman intelligence) technology is. “It’s hard to state how far in
advance it is. You’re just assuming some sort of linear progression.
They’ve made an asymptotal leap that put them over the edge. They’re
similarly as advanced as us but they’ve had an asymmetric evolution they
went a different path than us. While we’ve made nuclear weapons,
they’ve made a propulsion discovery but they’re not that much more
advanced than you and I”.
29:50-
Grusch states that once we unlocked nuclear power we made major
technological strides. We may be one discovery away from manipulating
spacetime.
30:29- the UFOs are interested in our nuclear technology.
36:00
onward - Grusch references Lue Elizondo’s comment on the ETs studying
us and it’s possible the UFO crashes were intentionally seeded to test
humanity’s development in relation to being exposed to this technology.
42:00 onwards - there may have been scientific breakthroughs that were hidden from the public.
44:00
- Dr Hal Puthoff of the Pentagon insinuates that antigravity research
did get somewhere (made progress) and then was hidden.
47:00 onward - UFO metamaterials are discussed.
59:50- the connection of the “UFO Disclosure” movement (and intentional disinformation) to the “elite” is described by the host.
1:04:00
onwards - there’s a long history of “UFO debunkers” being directly
linked to government organizations that have actually studied UAP.
1:17:28- this portion is interesting since it references information that Elizondo and Dr Garry Nolan have stated.
For
background, Elizondo (Pentagon), Dr. Garry Nolan (accomplished academic
who was approached by the CIA to study UAPs, also stated they told him
information regarding the beings operating the crafts), and John Ramirez
[CIA- was referenced as having worked there separately by Jim Semivan
of the CIA, referenced in this article (https://www.benzinga.com/amp/content/34082411)] have all stated, in summary, that members within the defense establishment believe these beings are bioengineered AI.
Grusch
notably references this at this time stamp as a possibility to what
these beings are. If you notice, he goes out of his way to reference
specifically what Elizondo had stated in a past interview, that the ETs
are designed to look humanoid to interact with humans. (In Elizondo’s
interview, he brought up an example of how zookeepers in China disguise
themselves as pandas to interact with the pandas, and what we are seeing
is a similar situation).
1:19:30-
ETs being our descendants from the future is discussed. The host
describes this as being a possible reason for the ET
non-interventionism. As in, they don’t want to harm the timeline too
much such that their own existence is nullified. (My note: it would be
interesting if some of what people have witnessed is in fact humans from
the future that have mastered ET propulsion and time travel technology,
which is why they only appear fleetingly in some instances and choose
not to intervene in major events).
1:27:00
onward - military sensory systems disproportionately detect UFOs since
their collection mechanisms are more advanced than what’s available to
the average person.
1:32:30 onward - Grusch details how being on the Autism spectrum have shaped his interactions.
Grusch
background (wiki): David Charles Grusch is a decorated Afghanistan
combat veteran and former Air Force intelligence officer[1] who worked
in the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National
Reconnaissance Office (NRO).[2][3][4][5] From 2019 to 2021, he was the
representative of the NRO to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task
Force.[3][4][6] From late 2021 to July 2022, he was the co-lead for UAP
analysis at the NGA and its representative to the task force.[2] He
assisted in drafting the National Defense Authorization Act of 2023,[7]
which includes provisions for reporting of UFOs, including whistleblower
protections and exemptions to non-disclosure orders and
agreements.[8][9][10] Congressional interest in UFO sightings
immediately prior to Grusch's public claims surrounded questions about
the four objects that the Air Force shot down in February 2023.[11]
MEDIAWATCH’S QUESTIONS: 1. Why do you believe David Grusch’s Congressional testimony when there is no firsthand evidence? 2. Do you believe alien spacecraft have visited earth? 3. Do you believe the US government has retrieved alien spacecraft and bodies but covered up the evidence? 4. Do you know if an alien spacecraft is secretly held in the US, and if so, why not reveal its location? 5. Have you maintained your journalist objectivity in covering David Grusch’s claims?
ROSS COULTHART’S RESPONSE: • The tenor of these questions suggests that MediaWatch has a pre-conceived agenda in how it will report this issue. This is because MediaWatch’s questions are grounded in a false assumption.
• MediaWatch’s questions state as a fact that there is no first-hand evidence to support David Grusch’s allegations. Contrary to misreporting in some US legacy media, there is first-hand evidence, and it has been presented under oath to the Intelligence Community Inspector General in private hearings (the ICIG is the oversight body for the US’ intelligence services). I have confirmed this testimony with multiple sources directly and I have interviewed first-hand witnesses myself directly.
• The current ICIG Thomas Monheim is still preparing his report into Mr Grusch’s allegations, comprising both Grusch’s complaint about reprisals against him for being a zealous UAPTF investigator and whistleblower and also, most importantly, the Inspector General is investigating Mr Grusch’s complaint that there has been a conspiracy within both the US Defense Dept & intelligence community and senior executives in private aerospace to illegally conceal a non-human intelligence [NHI] crash retrieval program and reverse engineering program from Congressional oversight.
• As I have confirmed both with Mr Grusch and Congressional sources, the current ICIG was so concerned about Mr Grusch’s allegations, after conducting his own investigations, that he referred all of them immediately to Congress, deeming all of Grusch’s complaints “urgent and credible”.
• I emphasise, these ICIG investigations included multiple interviews with first-hand witnesses to the NHI crash retrieval and reverse engineering program known to Mr Grusch, as well as other evidence. Other first-hand witnesses have also testified to the ICIG who are not known to Mr Grusch, backing his allegations.
underground | What is the best investigative model to study UFO phenomena? Should we use a legal approach with judicial rules of evidence, obtain testimony and review documents? Should we attempt a “scientific” investigation by analyzing sighting reports? This is the avowed approach of civilian investigative groups like the Mutual UFO Network. Better yet, should we attempt real-time observations of UAPs as Harvard Professor Avi Loeb’s Galileo Project is planning to do?
I prefer the Intelligence-Counterintelligence Model of Val Germann put forth over 20 years ago, and as is the case for most original thinkers in ufology, he was nearly totally ignored. I have modified Germann's analysis for what I imagine might someday be a social movement linking UFOs to possible solutions for the challenges that our civilization is facing. These problems include, endless warfare, the nuclear arms race, racism, global warming and the obscene disparities of wealth and power that exist across our wounded planet.
I imagine that power elites are opposed to revealing what they know and don’t know about flying saucers because the phenomenon undermines the pillars of elite power. These include the economic, political, military and ideological institutions of modern society. Any potential threat to the supremacy of the ruling classes is going to trigger a reaction from them. This is one important rationale for the UFO coverup with continued surveillance and past harassment of UFO experiencers by clandestine intelligence operators in service to our rulers.
So, we now are looking at a dynamic in which an intelligence-counterintelligence approach to UFOs can have utility. In a struggle that will determine the future of Earth civilization, there will be those that support radical reforms such as establishing an enduring world peace and ending environmental pollution, poverty and ignorance. And then there are those that promote conflict, social injustice and the increased accumulation of wealth by the super-rich.
In this conflict-oriented description of the world scene, UFO intelligences are perhaps not an impartial cold and distant mysterious force. In my judgment, they someday might be a potential ally of those that want peace, environmental protection and a new world order based on cooperation, not conflict. This is not an idle fancy. For over seven decades contact experiencers have conveyed messages from flying saucer intelligences. These include stern warnings about the dangers of nuclear weapons, environmental pollution and endless tribal warfare that perhaps brand our civilization as a most self-destructive one.
Rather than being passive contact experiencers, networks of activists for decades have staged what I call Human Initiated Contact Events (HICE). These efforts have involved the Rama network starting in Peru in 1974. This group is now called Rahma. Beginning in the 1990s, contact teams operating under the banner of the Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind Initiative have engaged UAP intelligences in the course of fieldwork. I was a team coordinator in this effort from 1992 to 1998.
Only time will tell if this human empowered approach will be successful in deciphering the flying saucer enigma. As a participant in peace and social justice movements that flourished during the second half of the 20th century, it is a comfort to imagine that we just might have “friends in high places.” These mysterious non-human intelligences might even be willing to grant us limited assistance in the struggles ahead.
Researcher Val Germann wrote an important multi-part article in 1997. The links of the original posting are no longer operational. He has given me permission to repost his work on the contactunderground blog site.
kookscience |Memorandum 6751 is an informal designation for a Borderland Sciences Research Associates (BSRA)
document entitled "A MEMORANDUM OF IMPORTANCE" that was sent to the
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1947. It was authored by Meade Layne, who was the BSRA's director and main editor of the group's The Round Robin and The Flying Roll
newsletters. The document has been described as having been
"classified" by the FBI since its receipt and was released to the public
as part of an overall federal government declassification program;
however, it was certainly distributed through BSRA freely, and the
information contained in the document was frequently written about by
Layne and his associates in newsletters and mimeographs.
The number 6751 appears to have been stamped on the document at
the time of receipt, but does not seem to be an official document
number.
- A MEMORANDUM OF IMPORTANCE -
San Diego, California. July 8, 1947 -
(For your Information)
- A MEMORANDUM OF IMPORTANCE -
THIS
MEMORANDUM is respectfully addressed to certain scientists of
distinction, to important aeronautical and military authorities, to a
number of public officials and to a few publications.
The
writer has little expectation that anything of import will be
accomplished by this gesture. The mere fact that the data herein were
obtained by so-called supernormal means is probably sufficient to insure
its disregard by nearly all the persons addressed; nevertheless
it seems a public duty to make it available. (The present writer has
several university degrees and was formerly a university department
head).
A very serious situation may
develop at any time with regard to the "flying saucers." If one of those
should be attacked, the attacking plane will almost certainly be
destroyed. In the public mind this might create near panic and
international suspicion. The principal data concerning these craft is
now at hand and must be offered, no matter how fantastic and
unintelligible it may seem to minds not previously instructed in
thinking of this type.
1. Part of the disks carry crews, others are under remote control. 2. Their mission is peaceful. The visitors contemplate settling on this plane. 3. These visitors are human-like but much larger in size.
4. They are NOT excarnate earth people, but come from their own world. 5.
They do NOT come from any "planet" as we use the word, but from an
etheric planet which interpenetrates with our own and is not perceptible
to use. 6. The bodies of the visitors, and the craft also,
automatically "materialize" on entering the vibratory rate of our dense
matter. (Cp. "apports.")
7. The disks possess a type of radiant
energy, or a ray, which will easily disintegrate any attacking ship.
They reenter the etheric at will, and so simply disappear from our
vision, without trace. 8. The region from which they come is NOT the "astral plane", but corresponds to the Lokas or Talas. Students of esoteric matters will understand these terms. 9. They probably cannot be reached by radio, but probably can be by radar, if a signal system can be devised for that apparatus.
We
give information and warning, and can do no more. Let the newcomers be
treated with every kindness. Unless the disks are withdrawn, a
[illegible] [illegible] with which our culture and science are incapable
of dealing. Aheavyresponsibility rests upon the few in authority who are able to understand this matter.
Addendum:
The Lokas are oval shape, fluted length in - oval with a heat-resisting
metal or alloy not yet known; the front edge contains the controls; the
middle portion is a laboratory; the rear contains armament, which
consists essentially of a powerful [illegible] energy apparatus, perhaps
a ray apparatus [illegible].
Note that, in addition to some illegible text caused partially by
later hand writing and stamping, the name and signature of Meade Layne
have been redacted. A scanned copy of the "Memorandum" is included on
page 22 of UFO Part 1 of 16, https://vault.fbi.gov/UFO/UFO%20Part%201%20of%2016
nih.gov | In 1995, U.S. President Clinton, by order number
1995‐4‐17 entitled “Classified National Security Information,”
declassified several research programs (among other contents) funded by
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) of the United States (Puthoff, 1996). These covert programs were developed over more than 20 years at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI, now SRI International) and the Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) (cf. Srinivasan, 2002).
Programs addressed remote viewing (RV), that is, determined whether
certain individuals, under conditions of perceptual isolation, could
access information about places, buildings, photographs, etc., from a
distance using putative psi rather than conventional sensory channels
(Targ, 2019).
The specific objective was to explore whether RV phenomena had enough
consistency and stability for use in military espionage (McMoneagle, 2015; Puthoff, 1996).
Due to the Cold War and ensuing political‐military tensions between the
United States and the former Soviet Union, American Congress classified
these programs in the interests of national security (Targ, 1996).
The fact that the RV experiments were hidden or classified undermined
transparency in scientific research practices. Specifically, other
laboratories were not given access to information and were unable to
evaluate outcomes with proper methodological or statistical rigor (see
the critique by Hyman, 1996 and Nelson et al., 1996).
1.1. What is remote viewing?
RV is an experiential technique for altered‐anomalous states (see Utts, 1995, 1996, 1995, 1996, 2018) that allows two types of anomalous cognitions to be subjected to empirical scrutiny (see also Schooler et al., 2018): (a) precognition (also called anticipation of unpredictable stimuli or anomalous anticipation of information, Mossbridge et al., 2012)
can be defined as the process by which a person accesses information
about the future (i.e., events that have not yet happened) without using
sensory or otherwise rational channels recognized by conventional
scientific theory (Bem, 2011); and (b) retro‐cognition (also called anomalous information reception or clairvoyance)
is defined as the process by which a person accesses content referring
to the past (i.e., content that has already happened) without using the
conventional channels of biology or logic per current scientific theory
(Marwaha & May, 2016). The expression psi phenomena or psi
is a hypothetical construct that has the same definition attributed to
anomalous cognitions. However, the term anomalous cognitions is a more
neutral label, as the term psi is often used by
parapsychologists. All these concepts have been sharply criticized on
methodological, statistical, or conceptual grounds (e.g., Escolà ‐Gascón,
2022a; Houran et al., 2018; Reber & Alcock, 2020; Wagenmakers et al., 2011).
In RV, the participant is asked to visualize the information they intend to access (from the past or the future) (Roe et al., 2020). Then, the participant must mentally and nonverbally represent the distant target or targets to be guessed (May et al., 2011; Scott, 1988). The target is often a specific place, person, or fact (May, 1996; Puthoff, 1996; Targ, 1996). The targets of RV experiments (published in Nature, see Targ & Puthoff, 1974) contained specific meanings of interest to U.S. national security (e.g., the location of a secret military base) (see Utts, 1995, 1996, 1995, 1996, 2018). The present study focused on RV relative to anomalous information reception, as it is one of the most researched anomalous phenomena showing significant results (see Bem et al., 2016; Tressoldi & Storm, 2021). Unfortunately, the abbreviation for anomalous information reception (AIR) is the same as the abbreviation for the American Institutes for Research (also AIR) and we wish to prevent confusion. So, henceforth, we use the terms anomalous cognitions and RV to refer exclusively to anomalous information reception.
Since
1972, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) commissioned several
research programs on remote viewing (RV) that were progressively
declassified from 1995 to 2003. The main objectives of this research
were to statistically replicate the original findings and address the
question: What are the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved in RV?
The research focused on emotional intelligence (EI) theory and intuitive
information processing as possible hypothetical mechanisms.
Methods
We
used a quasi‐experimental design with new statistical control
techniques based on structural equation modeling, analysis of
invariance, and forced‐choice experiments to accurately objectify
results. We measured emotional intelligence with the Mayer—Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test.
A total of 347 participants who were nonbelievers in psychic
experiences completed an RV experiment using targets based on location
coordinates. A total of 287 participants reported beliefs in psychic
experiences and completed another RV experiment using targets based on
images of places. Moreover, we divided the total sample into further
subsamples for the purpose of replicating the findings and also used
different thresholds on standard deviations to test for variation in
effect sizes. The hit rates on the psi‐RV task were contrasted with the
estimated chance.
Results
The
results of our first group analysis were nonsignificant, but the
analysis applied to the second group produced significant RV‐related
effects corresponding to the positive influence of EI (i.e., hits in the
RV experiments were 19.5% predicted from EI) with small to moderate
effect sizes (between 0. 457 and 0.853).
Conclusions
These
findings have profound implications for a new hypothesis of anomalous
cognitions relative to RV protocols. Emotions perceived during RV
sessions may play an important role in the production of anomalous
cognitions. We propose the Production‐Identification‐Comprehension (PIC) emotional model as a function of behavior that could enhance VR test success.
defense.gov | Today the department launched a website on the
All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office to provide the public with
information concerning AARO and its efforts to understand and resolve
unidentified anomalous phenomena.
This website will provide information, including photos and videos,
on resolved UAP cases as they are declassified and approved for public
release. The website's other content includes reporting trends and a
frequently asked questions section as well as links to official reports,
transcripts, press releases, and other resources that the public may
find useful, such as applicable statutes and aircraft, balloon and
satellite tracking sites.
This fall, consistent with Section 1673 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, AARO will launch a secure
reporting tool on the website to enable current and former U.S.
government employees, service members, or contractors with direct
knowledge of U.S. government programs or activities to contact AARO
directly to make a report. The department is conducting its final
reviews to ensure the reporting mechanism complies with the Privacy Act
of 1974, the Whistleblower Protections Enhancement Act of 2012, the
Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (No FEAR
Act), and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In the interim, current
U.S. service members, U.S. government employees, and civil aviators are
encouraged to continue to use the existing reporting mechanisms
available to them through their organizations. A mechanism for members
of the general public to make reports will be announced in coming
months.
The department is committed to transparency with the American people
on AARO's work on UAP. This website will serve as a one-stop shop for
all publicly available information related to AARO and UAP, and AARO
will regularly update the website with its most recent activities and
findings as new information is cleared for public release.
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...