WSJ | Democratic and Republican congressional leaders struck an optimistic tone that they would avert a government shutdown this weekend
after a White House meeting in which lawmakers also stepped up pressure
on House Speaker Mike Johnson (R., La.) to allow a long-stalled vote on
Ukraine aid to go forward.
Johnson
is expected to put forward legislation in coming days that would keep
the government fully open, but the details remained uncertain. The
Congress has until Saturday at 12:01 a.m. to fund the departments of
Veterans Affairs, Transportation, Agriculture, Energy and several other
agencies that have been operating on temporary extensions since Sept.
30. The funding for the rest of the federal government expires after
March 8.
The
main holdup has been in the Republican-led House, where Johnson is
managing a rowdy GOP conference that has taken a hard line on spending
and is increasingly skeptical of foreign aid, even as the
Democratic-controlled Senate has been ready for months to move forward.
Emerging
from the meeting, Johnson said he was “very optimistic” about
government- funding talks. Leaders think “we can get to agreement on
these issues and prevent a government shutdown,” he said. He didn’t take
questions.
The
other congressional leaders at the sit-down—Senate Majority Leader
Chuck Schumer, (D., N.Y.), Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) and
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.)—also sounded upbeat
about avoiding a shutdown.
“We
are making good progress,” said Schumer, adding there was some “back
and forth on some issues that different people want.” But he said, “I
don’t think those are insurmountable.” He indicated that the most likely
path was a short-term spending patch to give negotiators more time to
complete the full fiscal-year bills.
McConnell
said everyone was on the same page regarding the need to keep the
government funded. “I think we can stop that drama right now before it
emerges,” he said.
The
leaders sat down in the Oval Office, with Biden and Vice President
Kamala Harris positioned in armchairs near a crackling fire.
Congressional leaders sat on sofas arranged around a coffee table.
Those gathered for the meeting, including McConnell, pressed Johnson to allow a House vote on a Ukraine aid package.
Central Intelligence Agency Director William J. Burns gave a
presentation laying out the difficult conditions for Ukrainian soldiers
on the battlefield, with troops running out of munitions.
The
Senate passed a $95.3 billion package this month that contained a fresh
round of aid for Ukraine and funds for Israel and Taiwan. Johnson has
declined to put it on the House floor. House Republicans are divided on
Ukraine aid, with a little more than half on the record opposing it in
the past, including Johnson before he became speaker. The Senate bill
would need significant Democratic support to pass.
Schumer
said the discussion on Ukraine was “the most intense I have ever
encountered in my many meetings in the Oval Office.” He said he told
Johnson he would “regret it for the rest of his life” if he blocked assistance for Kyiv.
Johnson “said he wanted to get Ukraine done, and he had to figure out the best way to do it,” Schumer recalled.
In
the meeting, McConnell, a strong advocate for Kyiv, told Johnson the
House’s best path forward on Ukraine is to pass the Senate bill, because
making any changes would further delay the aid. “We have a time problem
here,” he told reporters.
Johnson
said he continued to insist on steps to secure the southern U.S. border
before passing any foreign-aid package. The House “is actively pursuing
and investigating all the various options” on the Ukraine package, he
said, but “the first priority of the country is our border.” Earlier
this year, Republicans blocked a bipartisan Senate deal linking aid to
Ukraine with changes at the border, saying it wasn’t tough enough.
House
Speaker Mike Johnson (R., La.), speaking with reporters after meeting
with President Biden and other congressional leaders, said he thought a
government shutdown could be averted. Photo: Evan Vucci/Associated Press
The
White House meeting started shortly before noon and lasted about an
hour. Johnson briefly spoke one-on-one with the president after the
meeting ended. White House officials declined to say what the two men
discussed, other than explaining that the conversation wasn’t scheduled
in advance.
Afterward,
Biden told reporters a “bipartisan solution” was needed to fund the
government. Regarding Ukraine, he said “the need is urgent” for
additional funds. “I think the consequences of inaction in Ukraine are
dire,” Biden said.
Such
White House summits are high-profile opportunities for both sides to
show they are fighting for their parties’ priorities, rather than
nitty-gritty policy negotiations. But the moment was particularly
challenging for Johnson, a formerly little-known conservative who
leapfrogged from the lower ranks of House Republican leadership to
assume the speakership in October, after a group of GOP dissidents ousted his predecessor, former Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.).
Unlike other senior leaders on Capitol Hill, Johnson has almost no pre-existing relationship with Biden.
For
months, the Republican House and Democratic Senate have deferred on
Congress’s responsibility to set new spending levels and priorities for
the federal government for fiscal year 2024, instead passing a series of
stopgap measures by repeatedly extending spending levels set back in
December 2022.
Johnson has a number of options.
none of which will satisfy all House Republicans. He could seal a deal
with congressional Democrats and try to pass fresh full-year spending
legislation at a two-thirds threshold, bypassing Republican holdouts.
Johnson could put it off a few days or weeks with a short-term
patch—again with Democrats’ help. Or he could try to rely on his narrow
Republican majority to pass another stopgap bill through September,
triggering automatic across-the-board spending cuts; such a move would
be almost certain to lead to a shutdown because any such measure would
be dead on arrival in the Senate.
Beneath the surface of the spending fight,
a tug of war is playing out inside the House Republican conference
between military hawks and conservatives opposed to further spending,
with Johnson caught in the middle. The military hawks want to avoid the
defense cuts that would be triggered if Congress fails to enact new
full-year spending measures by April 30. The critics of more spending
benefit from congressional inaction, because it brings them closer to
the date when across-the-board cuts would be activated under a provision
in last year’s Fiscal Responsibility Act.
Some
GOP lawmakers have said in recent days they wouldn’t mind a shutdown,
while other figures including McConnell have warned that shutdowns are
bad policy—and bad politics.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
Is Congress doing enough to avoid a partial government shutdown? Join the conversation below.
People
familiar with the negotiations between Johnson and Democrats said that a
key sticking point is how much money to appropriate for the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children.
Democrats are asking for $7.03 billion, more than the $6.3 billion
previously sought by the Senate and requested in Biden’s budget. But the
GOP-led House passed a measure including $6 billion for the program,
which provides food and health assistance.
Another
obstacle, these people said, is a provision to block the VA from
reporting the names of veterans who need help managing their benefits to
a national background-check system used to screen gun purchases.
Democrats want the language to be stripped out.
Even
if those issues get resolved, Johnson must sell the deal to his
factious conference after House lawmakers return Wednesday to
Washington. A House Republican meeting is scheduled for Thursday.
A
Friday conference call for GOP lawmakers did little to assuage raw
feelings as Johnson sought for an hour to manage the expectations of his
conference, fielding more than a dozen questions. The speaker told
lawmakers not to expect a home run or grand slams in the spending bills,
but instead singles or doubles, according to people on the call.
Johnson said such expectations reflected the reality of divided
government, and that some Republicans’ willingness to block routine
procedural votes—essentially paralyzing the floor—had hurt Republicans’
leverage in talks with Democrats.
Some
Republicans complained that he had offered little information about the
substance of any of the spending bills, raising fears that Johnson was
setting the stage for another episode in which he would rely on
Democratic votes to clear must-pass legislation through the House.
So
far, Johnson has passed five major bills at a two-thirds threshold with
the help of Democrats: two previous stopgap spending bills; the annual defense-policy bill; a temporary reauthorization of the Federal Aviation Administration; and a bipartisan tax bill.
McCarthy’s
willingness to pass a stopgap bill with Democratic votes in September
triggered the rebellion that led to his removal. The same fate could
await Johnson if at least three House Republicans were willing to vote
with all Democrats to fire him from the speakership, given the narrow
majority in the House.
CTH | I find it very interesting this report surfaces in the New York Times
and not The Washington Post first. This material distinction showcases
the motive for the outline is heavily domestic in nature; meaning, the
core of domestic USA politics (specifically the White House) needs to
admit that Ukraine is a proxy province in order to retrigger support for
policy.
[Inside Baseball] – Watch the responses
to this report from CNN (State Dept) carefully and watch the responses
from WaPo (CIA/Intel). The more subtle and/or quiet the response(s), the
more certain these influence institutions were collaborating on the
material report to the New York Times.
The White House is admitting the CIA and larger IC apparatus, which
includes the State Dept., has been heavily controlling all activity in
Ukraine for the past decade. The only reason to admit this now very publicly is because they are losing voter support. THIS EXPLAINS WHY BIDEN IS CALLING FOR A WHITE HOUSE MEETING!!
The US’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) maintains 12 secret bases
in Ukraine along the border with Russia, and last Thursday CIA chief
William Burns made his 10th secret visit to Ukraine since the start of
Russia’s full-scale invasion.
The Times is now reporting the USA (State Dept.) was responsible for
the coup in Ukraine (color revolution) and took control over political
operations in 2014. We have long suspected this; many have reported
exactly this reality; however, this is the first time it has all been
admitted.
(NYT)
– The C.I.A.’s partnership in Ukraine can be traced back to two phone
calls on the night of Feb. 24, 2014, eight years to the day before
Russia’s full-scale invasion.
Millions
of Ukrainians had just overrun the country’s pro-Kremlin government and
the president, Viktor Yanukovych, and his spy chiefs had fled to Russia. In the tumult, a fragile pro-Western government quickly took power.
The
government’s new spy chief, Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, arrived at the
headquarters of the domestic intelligence agency and found a pile of
smoldering documents in the courtyard. Inside, many of the computers had
been wiped or were infected with Russian malware.
“It was empty. No lights. No leadership. Nobody was there,” Mr. Nalyvaichenko said in an interview.
He went
to an office and called the C.I.A. station chief and the local head of
MI6. It was near midnight but he summoned them to the building, asked
for help in rebuilding the agency from the ground up, and proposed a
three-way partnership. “That’s how it all started,” Mr. Nalyvaichenko
said. (read more)
Source: The New York Times, based on more than 200 interviews with current and former officials in Ukraine, the United States and Europe.
The report tries to paint various Ukraine officials as the
originators of the operation to use Ukraine as the tip of the spear
against the Russia construct; however, it doesn’t take a deep weeds
walker to realize that part of the narrative is needed to protect the
U.S. foreign influence policy from public ridicule.
The White House needs support for their Ukraine proxy. The public
opposition to that continued policy agenda is a problem. The
politicians are caving to pressure from the people. The IC needs to
change the narrative urgently; thus the admission takes place.
TUCKER CARLSON: “How can world governments kill more than 10 million people and leave some large undetermined number disabled for life? And not say a word about it. Not apologize. Not work to fix it. Not work to make the families whole. I mean, just leave it by the side of the… pic.twitter.com/zVy7ZY3rPB
TUCKER CARLSON: “How can world governments kill more than 10 million people and leave some large undetermined number disabled for life? And not say a word about it. Not apologize. Not work to fix it. Not work to make the families whole. I mean, just leave it by the side of the road like a corpse and keep marching. I don’t understand that. How can that happen?
STEVE KIRSCH: “Believe me, I’m surprised, as well. You know, I can’t get an audience with anybody in the United States Congress. Except for Senator Ron Johnson. Like, I can’t have a dialogue. They won’t talk to me. Nobody wants to know. They don’t want to know the truth. It’s like autism in this country. You know, autism has been around for a very long time. And we’ve known from the statistics that vaccines cause autism. It’s the leading cause of autism. Now, can we even get a discussion about that?”
TUCKER CARLSON: “May I? May I ask you to pause that? I mean, the statement you just made is verboten. I mean, no person who wanted to say work at the Atlantic magazine or who takes the New York Times on a daily basis would ever say something like that because you’re not allowed to say that. Tell us why you say that?”
STEVE KIRSCH: “Because it’s true. I’ve collected my own data just independently, to look at, at the connection between vaccines and autism. And it’s amazing. I had over 10,000 parents, tell me about their kids. And I said, hey, tell me about your kids. Tell me how many vaccines they got, and tell me if they have autism. Tell me if they have ADHD. You know, just tell me about your kids. Tell me about the medical conditions. And tell me about how many shots they get. And it’s a straight line. The more shots you get, the more likely you are to get autism. And it’s the same thing for ADHD. It’s the same thing for PANDAS. It’s the same thing for autoimmune diseases. I mean that it is basically the more shots you get, the less healthy the kids are.”
twitter | Over my 35-year career, I have been the subject of many thousands of articles, including extremely negative, inaccurate, and libelous articles, yet I have never sued a media organization or a journalist.
Beginning in early January of this year, Business Insider released a series of stories about my partner in life, @NeriOxman, that were defamatory, materially false and misleading, and designed to cause her harm, principally because the reporters do not like me, my support for Israel, and my advocacy to remove former Harvard President Claudine Gay due to her leadership failures, and her lack of moral clarity.
These are not fantastical accusations. We prove them with detailed empirical evidence in a 77-page demand letter that we sent to @axelspringer this morning, and that we are sharing publicly now.
After I posted weeks ago on @X that I intended to sue @Businessinsider and its parent company Axel Springer for defamation, I heard from a number of people that I highly respect who strongly discouraged me from suing, pleading with me to find another solution to resolve this mess.
These individuals did not question that Neri and I had been defamed, but rather they explained that Axel Springer has been perhaps the strongest long-term supporter of the state of Israel of any media organization, and also an important advocate against antisemitism.
I also recently had the opportunity to have dinner with Mathias DΓΆpfner, the CEO of Axel Springer, and he seemed like a good man. We did not, however, discuss the Business Insider reporting or the lawsuit that night, but my opportunity to meet him confirmed much of what I had been told about him and Axel Springer.
Upon consideration of the advice we have received from people we highly respect and my opportunity to meet Mathias DΓΆpfner, we are making an effort to avoid litigation by sending Axel Springer this demand letter in which we outline with particularity all of the facts around BI’s reporting of this matter, the factual inaccuracies in its reporting, Axel Springer’s false statements about BI’s reporting, and a proposed resolution.
If we can resolve this matter as we have proposed, we can avoid litigation, and more importantly, we can hopefully end Business Insider’s unethical and unprofessional practices. If indeed Axel Springer is the professional ethical media company that I am told it is and it purports to be, it cannot continue to own and control Business Insider if it continues to operate as it has historically.
The 77-page demand letter can be found here:
http://clarelocke.com/OxmanRetraction
I strongly encourage you to read the letter. The letter includes the detailed WhatsApp, SMS, and email correspondence that I and Fran McGill, our head of communications, had with the main protagonists in this situation including Henry Blodget, Chairman and Founder of Business Insider, Mathias DΓΆpfner, CEO of Axel Springer, Henry Kravis, Co-Executive Chairman of KKR, Martin Varsavsky, Director of Axel Springer, Katherine Long, BI’s Investigative Reporter, and John Cook, Executive Editor of BI.
It will not go unnoticed that the demand letter reads remarkably similarly to the pleadings of a lawsuit. If needed, we can convert the demand letter into a complaint and file a lawsuit, which I hope is unnecessary.
Business Insider is well known for its dishonest and unprofessional journalism. BI’s actions here are sadly representative of its approach to journalism, and similar to its many other unfair, sensational, false and misleading attacks on high-profile people designed to satisfy the politics and preferences of its journalists, and to drive advertising revenues.
Business Insider has caused enormous harm and reputational damage to many with its false and misleading reporting and unethical tactics. Remarkably, however, Business Insider’s CEO and Axel Springer’s spokesperson claim that Business Insider is a paragon of journalistic professionalism, ethics, and virtue.
In January, when I publicly challenged the accuracy and reporting of the stories, Business Insider’s CEO, Barbara Peng, stated that:
“The process we went through to report, edit, and review the stories was sound, as was the timing… The stories are accurate and the facts well documented.”
Similarly, Adib Sisani, Axel Springer’s spokesperson said:
“I’m certain the sourcing and technical journalistic work done was spotless.”
I strongly encourage you to compare the above statements with the empirical evidence and other irrefutable facts that are included in our demand letter, and judge for yourself.
The demand letter was prepared by Libby Locke of Clare Locke LLP, a firm best known for its recent representation of Dominion Voting Machine in its lawsuit against Fox that resulted in a $787.5 million settlement for Dominion.
Libby and her partner Tom Clare are the rock stars of defamation law. They should be your first call if something like what happened to Neri and me happens to you.
twitter | In which Jon Stewart tries to convince you crime and urban decay are simply “the price of freedom” and Russia’s clean streets and subways are only possible because of political repression—a total crock, and he knows it. America could easily enjoy those things too, and has in the past.
The idea here is just to use the bogeyman Putin to reconcile Americans to their own social decline by making them reflexively suspicious of high-trust societies, and associate any attempts to stem/reverse the problem (or even draw attention to it) with authoritarianism. “Don’t believe your lying eyes and draw the obvious conclusions—that’s what fascists do!”
No, actually, we don’t have to accept “urinal caked chaotic subways” to protect our liberty. Incredibly stupid and insidious argument by Stewart.
#Israel official states: "I am personally proud of the ruins of Gaza, and that every baby, even 80 years from now, will tell their grandchildren what the Jews did."
— May Golan, Israeli Minister of Social Equality & Women's Advancement
AA | Israeli Minister of Social Equality May Golan said she is "proud" of the destruction caused by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip.
Speaking during a session held by the Knesset (Israel’s parliament) Wednesday evening, Golan threatened Hamas leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, with decapitation or arrest.
"We are not ashamed by saying that we want to see the soldiers of the IDF (Israeli army) catching Sinwar and his terrorists by their eyes and dragging them across the Gaza Strip on their way to the dungeons of the Prison Authority," she said in a widely circulated video of her speech.
"I am personally proud of the ruins of Gaza, and that every baby, even 80 years from now, will tell their grandchildren what the Jews did," she said. "No dove and no olive branch, only a sword to cut off Sinwar's head, that's what he will receive from us.”
Israel has pounded the Gaza Strip since an Oct. 7 Hamas attack that Tel Aviv says killed nearly 1,200 people.
The ensuing Israeli bombardment has killed at least 29,410 victims and caused mass destruction and shortages of necessities. Nearly 70,000 people have been injured.
The Israeli war on Gaza has pushed 85% of the territory's population into internal displacement amid acute shortages of food, clean water and medicine, while 60% of the enclave's infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, according to the UN.
For the first time since its creation in 1948, Israel stands accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice, the highest judicial body of the United Nations.
An interim ruling in January ordered Tel Aviv to stop genocidal acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians in Gaza.
thenewyorker | Yet
Britain, however formidable its power, did not conjure up the Jewish
national home with magic words. Since the Ukrainian pogroms of 1881,
about thirty-five thousand settlers had come to various colonies in
Ottoman Palestine, most funded by Baron James de Rothschild, half of
whom stayed. About ninety thousand acres of land had been purchased, and
new winemaking towns were dotting the Palestinian landscape: Rishon
LeZion, Zichron Ya’akov. The real reason Weizmann had rejected East
Africa in 1905 was that a national home in
Eretz Yisrael
was, however embryonic, becoming an established fact. By the end of
1905, with the arrival of five thousand socialist cadres from Russia—the
so-called Second Aliyah, or ascent—Labor Zionism had its ideology, the
beginning of its revolutionary infrastructure, and its leadership,
including David Ben-Gurion, who was later Israel’s first Prime Minister.
In 1909, Tel Aviv, the first modern Hebrew-speaking city, had been
founded just north of Jaffa. That same year, a Labor Zionist group
inspired by Ben-Gurion’s hero, A. D. Gordon, founded the first of the
kibbutzim near the Sea of Galilee. Weizmann’s mentor, Asher Ginsberg
(known by his pen name, Achad Haam), visited a collective settlement in
Palestine in 1911. He wrote
in an essay for Zionist readers the next year, “So soon as the Jew from
the Diaspora enters a Jewish colony in Palestine he feels that he is in a
Hebrew national atmosphere . . . half-complete, extending only to
children . . . but going on.” (Weizmann stayed at Ginsberg’s home in
London—the latter made his living as the sales representative of
Wissotzky tea—during the negotiations leading to the Declaration.)
The
Declaration, then, only crystallized for the great powers what seemed a
workable cultural transformation—of Jews, but also of a part of the
Palestinian landscape. By the time of the Balfour Declaration, there
were as many as fifty thousand Zionist settlers, whom the Turks had
tried, and failed, to suppress. (The chaos of the Soviet Revolution was
bringing thousands, and would bring tens of thousands more.) Indeed, the
most prominent, or conspicuous, Arab leaders seemed somewhat
reconciled, too. In 1918, Weizmann travelled to Aqaba to meet Feisal;
neither yet knew the full extent of Britain’s intentions to take
Palestine for itself. Weizmann supported a larger Hashemite federation,
and Feisal, the Arabs’ champion, Jewish “closer settlement and intensive
cultivation of the soil”—so long as “Arab peasant and tenant farmers
shall be protected in their rights.” Feisal, meanwhile, told the
Times
of London that December, “Arabs are not jealous of Zionist Jews, and
intend to give them fair play; and the Zionist Jews have assured the
Nationalist Arabs of their intention to see that they too have fair play
in their respective areas.” The socialist-Zionist method of settlement,
so disdained by the British yet so suited for incubating Hebrew
culture, was bound, however, to encroach upon “Arab peasant and tenant
farmers,” known as fellaheen.
(The riots of 1921 had been incited, in part, by the purchase of vast
lands in the Jezreel Valley, which was accomplished in a manner that had
displaced, and enraged, thousands of
fellaheen.)
Putting
the Balfour Declaration into practice—so the Colonial Office
stated—presumed an “equality of obligation” to both sides. It was
another matter to presume “fair play.” As Balfour admitted in a secret
memorandum in August, 1919, “So far as Palestine is concerned, the
powers have made no statement of fact that is not admittedly wrong, and
no declaration of policy which, at least in the letter,
they have not always intended to violate.” The British were straight
about one thing: the Declaration did not presume a Jewish state, which
Weizmann himself could not yet envision. Building a novel Jewish nation
was challenge enough; how this nation’s home might fit into larger
Middle Eastern structures and machinations seemed a secondary
consideration. But while the British occupation army still had the power
to end Zionist colonization with brute force, it was too late to neatly
nip it in the bud. By 1922, as Balfour addressed the Lords, the Jewish
population had reached nearly eighty-five thousand.
kunstler | “Biden’s most important
achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a
more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to
keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall,” the report
states.
Gearing up? I’m sure. If gearing up means calling a lid
on your life an hour after breakfast. And what do you suppose they mean
by “a more traditional form of leadership.” Arranging serial overseas
military humiliations? Selling favors to all comers from foreign lands?
Inviting transsexuals to cavort on the White House lawn? Abolishing
control of US borders? Running a $2-trillion annual deficit? Mandating
unsafe and ineffective so-called “vaccine” shots on millions? Cancelling
the First Amendment? Stealing elections? Conspiring to jail his
political adversaries?
We’re also informed in recent days by
the Department of Justice that “Joe Biden” is not mentally competent to
answer for anything in a court of law, should someone inquire into the
signal irregularities emerging from the fugitive annals of his long
career. Of course, “Joe Biden” running for reelection is one of the
greatest gags ever put over on the American public. But more astounding
yet is that half the country persists in pretending to believe it. They
are egged on in every possible way by persons in high places of
government fearful of going to prison if the Democratic Party loses its
grip on the levers of power.
Since “Joe Biden” is not actually
calling the shots, one naturally wonders who is responsible for all the
dubious achievements of the past three years. I guess we’ll find out
when Mr. Trump wins that election in November, an outcome increasingly
guaranteed unless “Joe Biden” (or, let’s face it, our Intel Community)
takes the final decisive step of bumping off the Golden Golem of
Greatness. What have they got left? AI-contrived photos of Mr. Trump
having sex with a manatee in the intercoastal waterway off Mar-a-Lago?
In New York City, the Woke lunatics
did a victory dance after Judge Arthur Engoron, beaming his Joker smile,
laid a $350-million fine on Mr. Trump for conducting a set of normal
real estate transactions with a bank that profited from doing business
with him. Many are still trying to figure out how that amounts to a
crime of any sort. Don’t suppose that the check is in the mail, though.
There is an appeals process that leads, you may be sure, to a dismissal
of that inane judgment and the puerile hypotheticals that the case
derived from. And, by and by, you also might expect a countersuit for
malicious prosecution when all that smoke clears. New York Attorney
General Letitia James, lacking impulse control, is for the moment
enjoying the fulfillment of her campaign promise to “get Trump.” Waiting
to see how much she enjoys losing her law license in the days to come.
Every reaction provokes an equal and
opposite reaction, Newton’s Third Law states. It manifested shortly
after Judge Engoron’s end zone dance when a call went out over the
Internet for America’s truckers to refuse loads inbound to New York
City. We’ll have to stand by to see how that develops. No more bok choy,
Texas beef, or Meyer Lemons for you, “progressive” denizens of the Five
Boroughs! Embrace the suck! The genius part is that, unlike the 2022
Canadian truckers’ action in Ottawa, the American truckers will not be
cluttering up New York’s streets with their rigs, license plates on
view, leaving them vulnerable to such pranks as the shutdown of their
bank accounts. All they’ll do is sit innocently at home back in Kentucky
and Missouri, enjoying a break from the rigors of the highway. Is that a
crime? Arguably no more than doing a normal real estate deal in good
faith with a willing lender was a crime.
The truckers have promised to include
Washington DC next in their delivery boycott. The K-Street lobbying gang
won’t be buying any influence for a while over platters of grilled
branzino and Mariscos Molcajete. Maybe there will be a few Cliff Bars
left in the Farragut Square 7-Eleven and they can do business in their
cars. As for “Joe Biden,” his minders have probably laid in enough
Ensure for a well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory to get
by for a few weeks — until the magic moment when, alas, he must needs
be thrown under the bus of expediency to keep their game going.
nader | Among the puzzling questions that the media chooses to ignore is
asking high government officials why they are exercising the illegal use
of power that violates the rule of law which they are required to obey.
This week, the Veterans for Peace (VFP) made it very easy for reporters to pose questions by sending an open letter (See veteransforpeace.org)
to the Inspector General of the U.S. State Department and Antony
Blinken, Secretary of State, invoking several U.S. statutes that require
the “termination of provision of military weapons and munitions to
Israel.”
Josh Paul, a former senior official in the State
Department’s office charged with reviewing weapon transfers to foreign
countries, said: “The Secretary and all relevant officials under his
purview should take this letter from Veterans for Peace with the utmost
seriousness. It is a stark reminder of the importance of abiding by the
laws and policies that relate to arms transfers.”
What laws are
being violated by the State Department daily as it approves ships and
cargo planes full of weapons of mass destruction to be used in Israel’s
war crimes and genocide against hundreds of thousands of Gaza’s
civilians, mostly children and women?
These are the laws highlighted in the VFP letter:
The Foreign Assistance Act,
which forbids the provision of assistance to a government which
“engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally
recognized human rights.”
Arms Export Control Act,
which says countries that receive US military aid can only use weapons
for legitimate self-defense and internal security. Israel’s genocidal
campaign in Gaza goes way beyond self-defense and internal security.
The U.S. War Crimes Act,
which forbids grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, including
wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, wilfully causing great
suffering or serious injury to body or health, and unlawful deportation
or transfer, perpetrated by the Israeli Occupying Forces.
The Leahy Law,
which prohibits the U.S. Government from using funds for assistance to
units of foreign security forces where there is credible information
implicating that unit in the commission of gross violations of human
rights.
The Genocide Convention Implementation Act,
which was enacted to implement U.S. obligations under the Genocide
Convention, provides for criminal penalties for individuals who commit
or incite others to commit genocide
Under these laws, the
State Department has a “Conventional Arms Transfer Policy” which, the
letter notes, “prohibit [U.S. weapons transfers when it’s likely they]
will be used by Israel to commit … genocide, crimes against humanity,
grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, [including attacks
intentionally directed against civilian objects or civilians protected]
or other serious violations of international humanitarian or human
rights laws.”
The VFP letter continues, “Dozens of authoritative
complaints and referrals made by hospital administrators in Gaza, as
well as by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Palestine
Authority, South Africa, Turkey, Medicins san Frontieres, UNRWA, UNICEF,
the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the Norwegian Refugee
Council and the World Food Programme have confirmed that there is an
ongoing human rights and humanitarian disaster due to Israel’s cutoff of
water and electricity, deliberate destruction of sewage infrastructure
and delaying of aid shipments by Israeli forces.”
If you are
wondering why these laws are not being enforced – the answer is that
individual citizens or groups of citizens do not have any “legal
standing” to sue Secretary Blinken, according to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Only a Committee of Congress, backed by a Senate or House Resolution,
can take the State Department to federal court. That action to enforce
Congressionally passed and enacted laws is not likely to happen in this
lawless, Israeli government-indentured Congress which refuses even to
demand a ceasefire.
Mike Ferner, VFP National Director, observed
“Just as any good soldiers can recognize when they are given an unlawful
order, we believe some State Department staff are horrified at the
orders they’re given and will decide to uphold the law, find the courage
to speak out and demand an end to the carnage.”
There is a
related serious matter, pointed out by international law practitioner,
Bruce Fein who said “The United States has clearly become a
co-belligerent with Israel in its war against Hamas-Gaza Palestinians by
systematically supplying the IDF with weapons and intelligence without
conditions. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, nationals of a co-belligerent state are not regarded as protected persons if their state has customary diplomatic relations with an allied nation [in this case, Israel].”
For
decades, the State Department has had an independent Office of the
Legal Adviser. The present occupant of that post, acting legal adviser
Richard C. Visek has been publicly silent. I am sending the Veterans for
Peace letter to him and asking him to respond to this letter and to the
American people who pay his salary.
brownstone | In the final chapters of The Wuhan Cover-Up, RFK, Jr.
focuses on several key figures in the biowarfare-industrial-complex,
including Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust (now at the WHO), Anthony
Fauci of the NIH, and Bill Gates.
RFK, Jr. uses these figures to show how the Covid pandemic emerged
from the toxic stew of ethically compromised biowarfare research
standards; military, intelligence, public health, and academic
institutions/organizations dependent on biowarfare funding; the
involvement of China and global interests in the booming business of
“pandemic preparedness and response;” and, of course, the endless
pursuit of political power and personal enrichment.
Here’s a great summary of how they all came together, through
personal and institutional greed and power-mongering, to unleash the
Covid catastrophe on the world:
The evidence suggests that instead of relentlessly protecting public
health, Farrar exploited the pandemic to promote the venal financial
agendas of his WEF [World Economic Forum] patrons, to transform Western
democracies into surveillance states, to expand his personal power and
paycheck, and to pander to high-level Chinese officials. Achieving these
objectives required Farrar to hide [Covid’s] laboratory origins, a
project in which he enlisted a cadre of his medical cartel cronies—those
who, thanks to years of funding by Fauci, Farrar, and Gates, now occupy
the highest echelons of virology in academia, the regulatory agencies,
and pharmaceutical companies.
(p. 539)
If for nothing else, I would recommend adding The Wuhan Cover-Up
to your library as an invaluable resource on leading figures,
organizations, and power brokers involved in the
biowarfare-industrial-complex.
In fact, after reading the first few chapters – the ones that go into
the history of chemical and biological warfare and the rise of the
biowarfare-industrial-complex – I paradoxically felt an enormous sense
of relief.
Finally, we have a detailed account that shows – beyond what I would
consider a reasonable doubt – that the entire Covid catastrophe was
caused, and led, by a multinational
military-intelligence-academic-pharma-tech-NGO cabal.
RFK, Jr.’s conclusion is that we should look to a future “in which
the bio-elites are held responsible for their actions, people regain
their rights, and the Constitution is restored to its intended
preeminence.”
But how do we do that?
I am afraid, based on the information in his own book, and the fact
that RFK, Jr. himself is being censored and banned so extensively from
the public square, that the solution to the problems he exposes is much
more difficult and complex than just “holding the bio-elites
responsible” which will somehow lead to people regaining their rights.
What we need to do is to shut down, or extract ourselves from, the
global biowarfare-industrial-complex that is able to convince (or
coerce?) our governments into declaring states of emergency over
supposed pandemic threats, and then curtail civil rights and impose
massive surveillance, censorship, and propaganda that would not be
permitted in non-emergency situations. Not to mention garnering enormous
wealth while forcing the world’s population to accept novel, untested, and potentially lethal medical “countermeasures.”
The Wuhan Cover-Up does a better job than any other book or
article I have read at exposing the trends, forces, and institutions
that brought us the Covid catastrophe – with hundreds of pages of notes
and references. What’s frightening is that the enormity of the problem
is beyond the scope of the book, not just to solve, but even to fully
acknowledge.
Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy." pic.twitter.com/hDTEjAf89T
UNREAL: The censorship technologies originally intended for terrorist organizations have been weaponized against the American people.
TUCKER CARLSON: “So you’re saying the Pentagon, our Pentagon, the US Department of Defense, censored Americans during the 2020 election cycle?”
MIKE BENZ: “Yes. The two most censored events in human history, I would argue, to date, are the 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Benz calls artificial intelligence-based censorship technologies, which were created by DARPA to take on ISIS, “WEAPONS OF MASS DELETION.”
That technology, Benz says, has “the ability to censor tens of millions of posts with just a few lines of code.”
Benz detailed how the government-funded Virality Project identified 66 dissident narratives related to COVID-19, breaking them down into sub-claims for monitoring and censorship through machine learning models, aiming to control the spread of information harmful to official narratives or individuals like Tony Fauci.
“And whenever something started to trend that was bad for what the Pentagon wanted or was bad for what Tony Fauci wanted, they were able to take down tens of millions of posts. They did this in the 2020 election with mail-in ballots.”
caityjohnstone | If
I wanted to increase antisemitism, I imagine I’d do a lot of really
evil stuff under a Star of David flag while adamantly insisting that my
actions are inseparable from the Jewish people and the Jewish faith. I’d
kill children by the thousands and commit genocidal atrocities.
To
really help antisemitism spread I’d do everything I can to make people
less vigilant against it. I’d try very hard to make the warning label of
antisemitism look ridiculous and meaningless — circulate narratives
that people who oppose genocide and ethnic cleansing hate Jews, frame
peace marches as hate crimes, brand calls for justice as calls for the
genocide of Jewish people. I’d falsely cry wolf as many times as
possible in the most self-evidently absurd ways I could think of in
order to desensitize everyone to alarm bells about the real spread of
anti-Jewish hate.
I’d
try to make sure the Jewish soldiers carrying out the atrocities under
the Star of David flag make themselves look as inhuman as possible,
thereby dehumanizing ordinary Jews in the eyes of the public. They
should film themselves doing the most evil things imaginable while
laughing and celebrating their deeds, and then share those videos on
social media. The more viral content they can create with their horrific
acts, the better.
I
suppose I’d also want to research longstanding antisemitic conspiracy
theories and make sure everyone’s helping to feed into them. “Jews
control the media”? I’ll make sure the media are wildly biased in favor
of the Star of David flag. “Jews control the government”? Make sure
governments are bending over backwards to facilitate the crimes of the
Star of David nation. “Child blood sacrifices”? Make sure the war crimes
perpetrated under the Star of David flag are killing as many kids as
possible.
These
steps would create the perfect environment for very real acts of hatred
toward members of the Jewish faith, which I suppose could then be used
to drum up support for further atrocities, thereby making the very real
antisemitism even worse. This would create a self-reinforcing feedback
loop of violence and hatred, causing steadily escalating antisemitism
throughout our society that one day could potentially lead to something
as terrible as history has ever seen.
Of
course I would never do such a thing, because it would be a terrible
evil to inflict upon the Jews of the world. If such a thing happened it
wouldn’t be the fault of the Jews — many of whom are among the most kind
hearted and upstanding people on earth — it would be the fault of the
governments and media outlets who paved the way to such an outcome. Any
power structure which created or fed into such a dynamic would be
unforgivably depraved, and would need to be stopped for the good of
humanity.
thenewyorker | Although the
prospect seems scarcely imaginable now, there was a time, not very long
ago, when American Jews were free to have no particular thoughts or
feelings about Israel. This was true not only of run-of-the-mill Jews
but of intellectuals and writers as well. And it wasn’t merely that
assimilation—an act at once idealistic, pragmatic, and mortifying—was
more pressing to a Philip Roth or a Saul Bellow than one’s relationship,
one way or another, to the nascent Jewish state. It’s that Israel, and
Zionism, didn’t seem like relevant objects of concern. This is no longer
a tenable position. Joshua Cohen’s novel “The Netanyahus: An Account of a Minor and Ultimately Even Negligible Episode in the History of a Very Famous Family,”
which won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 2022, is a revisionist
history that needed little more than a year to lie in wait for its time.
The book is premised on a counterfactual: What if the American Jewish
intellectuals of the interwar period—that is, between the end of the
Second World War and the Six-Day War—had been forced to wrestle with
Zionism? And what if their Zionist challenger hadn’t represented the
ostensibly liberal, humanist, kibbutznik wing of the movement that was
then in ascendance, but the expansionist, chauvinistic, Messianic
contingent then in retreat? These aren’t idle questions.
Cohen’s novel is narrated from the present but takes place in 1959, to coincide with the publication of Roth’s “Goodbye, Columbus,”
a book with only a single glance over its shoulder at Israel—a
reference to the fact that the American Jew, when he thought about
Israel at all, then considered it a place that didn’t have enough trees.
Very loosely based on a personal anecdote relayed to Cohen (who, I
should probably note, is a friend of mine) by the late Harold Bloom,
“The Netanyahus” tells the story of an encounter between Ruben Blum, a
first-generation scholar of taxation—“I am a Jewish historian, but I am not
an historian of the Jews,” he warns, defensively—and Benzion Netanyahu.
At the time, Benzion was a largely unknown and quasi-mystical
interpreter of the Iberian Inquisition—which, for him, represented the
perennial efflorescence of antisemitism as a racialized (and hence
ineradicable) phenomenon. Much later, he became known as the (spiritual
and, incidentally, actual) father of Bibi, the current Israeli Prime Minister,
and as, in Bibi’s retelling, the patriarch of American-Israeli
relations. Blum, as the lone Jew on a rural campus that stands in for
Cornell, is asked by his Waspy, alcoholic department head to host
Benzion for a job talk. Benzion, who believes that the Jewish people can
only be safeguarded in perpetuity by Jewish state power, has become
persona non grata in Israel in part for the extremity of his views—the
territorialist belief, for example, that Jewish sovereignty ought to
extend over “Greater Israel.” He has been invited to interview for a
joint appointment in the college’s history department and its seminary.
The rationale is budgetary, but Benzion, despite his secularism,
exploits the irony of the occasion to try out the kind of end-times
ethnonationalism that will soon drive Religious Zionism and the settler
movement.
globalresearch |The following document pertaining
to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of
powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government, the
Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence
establishment.
President Donald Trump had confirmed in January 2017 his support of Israel’s illegal settlements (including his opposition to UN Security Council Resolution 2334,
pertaining to the illegality of the Israeli settlements in the occupied
West Bank). The Trump administration expressed its recognition of
Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. And now the entire West Bank
is being annexed to Israel.
Under the Biden administration, despite rhetorical shifts in the political narrative, Washington remains supportive of Israel plans to annex the entire Jordan River valley as well the illegal settlements in the West Bank.
Bear in mind: The
Greater Israel design is not strictly a Zionist Project for the Middle
East, it is an integral part of US foreign policy, its strategic
objective is to extend US hegemony as well as fracture and balkanize the
Middle East.
In
this regard, Washington’s strategy consists in destabilizing and
weakening regional economic powers in the Middle East including Turkey
and Iran. This policy –which is consistent with the Greater Israel– is
accompanied by a process of political fragmentation.
Since the Gulf war (1991), the Pentagon has contemplated the creation of a “Free Kurdistan” which would include the annexation of parts of Iraq, Syria and Iran as well as Turkey
According to the founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl,
“the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to
the Euphrates.” According to Rabbi Fischmann, “The Promised Land
extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts
of Syria and Lebanon.”
When
viewed in the current context, including the siege on Gaza, the Zionist
Plan for the Middle East bears an intimate relationship to the 2003
invasion of Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the
ongoing wars on Syria, Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political
crisis in Saudi Arabia.
The
“Greater Israel” project consists in weakening and eventually
fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of a US-Israeli expansionist
project, with the support of NATO and Saudi Arabia. In this
regard, the Saudi-Israeli rapprochement is from Netanyahu’s viewpoint a
means to expanding Israel’s spheres of influence in the Middle East as
well as confronting Iran. Needless to day, the “Greater Israel” project
is consistent with America’s imperial design.
“Greater Israel” consists in an area extending from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates. According to Stephen Lendman,
“A near-century ago, the World Zionist Organization’s plan for a Jewish state included:
• historic Palestine;
• South Lebanon up to Sidon and the Litani River;
• Syria’s Golan Heights, Hauran Plain and Deraa; and
• control of the Hijaz Railway from Deraa to Amman, Jordan as well as the Gulf of Aqaba.
Some
Zionists wanted more – land from the Nile in the West to the Euphrates
in the East, comprising Palestine, Lebanon, Western Syria and Southern
Turkey.”
The Zionist project has supported the Jewish settlement movement. More
broadly it involves a policy of excluding Palestinians from Palestine
leading to the annexation of both the West Bank and Gaza to the State of
Israel.
The
Project of “Greater Israel” is to create a number of proxy States,
which could include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well
as parts of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. (See map).
“[The
Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional
superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its
geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding
Arab states into smaller and weaker states.
Israeli
strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge from an
Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the
balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the
basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called
for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one
for Shiite Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims. The first step
towards establishing this was a war between Iraq and Iran, which the
Yinon Plan discusses.
The
Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in
2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the
outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden
Plan also calls for, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt,
and Syria. The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also
all fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for
dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and
then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.
“Greater Israel” would require the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states.
“The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must
1) become an imperial regional power, and
2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.
Small
here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state.
Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become
Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation…
This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in
Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into
smaller units has been a recurrent theme.” (Yinon Plan, see below)
Viewed in this context, the US-NATO led wars on Syria and Iraq are part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion.
In
this regard, the defeat of US sponsored terrorists (ISIS, Al Nusra) by
Syrian Forces with the support of Russia, Iran and Hezbollah constitute a
significant setback for Israel.
Short Pour and Other Defects
-
Two Mondays ago the bronze class poured my piece called by many "What the
Hell is that?" Part trilobite, tortoise shell and plant roots, the waxes
looked...
Death of the Author — at the Hands of Cthulhu
-
In 1967, French literary theorist and philosopher Roland Barthes wrote of
“The Death of the Author,” arguing that the meaning of a text is divorced
from au...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...
Silver
-
Noticed this.
Today is the 11th and Silver is from the 11th Group.
Silver is atomic number 47
"The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom, which de...
-
(Damn, has it been THAT long? I don't even know which prompts to use to
post this)
SeeNew
Can't get on your site because you've gone 'invite only'?
Man, ...
First Member of Chumph Cartel Goes to Jail
-
With the profligate racism of the Chumph Cartel, I don’t imagine any of
them convicted and jailed is going to do too much better than your run of
the mill ...