eurekalert | Would you believe that a broad range of human struggles can be
understood by using a mathematical formula? From child-parent struggles
to cyber-attacks and civil unrest, they can all be explained with a
simple mathematical expression called a "power-law."
In a sort of unified theory of human conflict, scientists have found
a way to mathematically describe the severity and timing of human
confrontations that affect us personally and as a society.
For example, the manner in which a baby's cries escalate against its
parent is comparable to the way riots in Poland escalated in the
lead-up to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It comes down to the fact
that the perpetrator in both cases (e.g. baby, rioters) adapts quickly
enough to escalate its attacks against the larger, but more sluggish
entity (e.g. parent, government), who is unable, or unwilling, to
respond quickly enough to satisfy the perpetrator, according to a new
study published in Nature's Scientific Reports.
"By picking out a specific baby (and parent), and studying what
actions of the parent make the child escalate or de-escalate its cries,
we can understand better how to counteract cyber-attacks against a
particular sector of U.S. cyber infrastructure, or how an outbreak of
civil unrest in a given location (e.g. Syria) will play out, following
particular government interventions," says Neil Johnson, professor of
physics and the head of the interdisciplinary research group in
Complexity, at the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of
Miami (UM) and corresponding author of the study.
Respectively, the study finds some remarkable similarities between seemingly disconnected confrontations. For instance:
- The escalation of violent attacks in Magdalena, Colombia -- though completely cut off from the rest of the world -- is actually representative of all modern wars. Meanwhile, the conflict in Sierra Leone, Africa, has exactly the same dynamics as the narco-guerilla war in Antioquia, Colombia.
- The pattern of attacks by predatory traders against General Electric (GE) stock is equivalent to the pattern of cyber-attacks against the U.S. hi-tech electronics sector by foreign groups, which in turn mimics specific infants and parents.
- New insight into the controversial 'Bloody Sunday' attack by the British security forces, against civilians, on January 30,1972, reveals that Bloody Sunday appears to be the culmination of escalating Provisional Irish Republican Army attacks, not their trigger, hence raising new questions about its strategic importance.
The findings show that this mathematical formula of the form AB-C
is a valuable tool that can be applied to make quantitative predictions
concerning future attacks in a given confrontation. It can also be used
to create an intervention strategy against the perpetrators and, more
broadly, as a quantitative starting point for cross-disciplinary
theorizing about human aggression, at the individual and group level, in
both real and online worlds.
11 comments:
Have your elite media courtesans begun sharpening their claws for one another? http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/23/business/media/when-60-minutes-checks-its-journalistic-skepticism-at-the-door.html
BD is pleased that Subrealism has raised the issue of describing human conflict by mathematics.
A fundamental axiom in the mathematics of inequalities states, "If equals are added to unequals, the results obtained are unequal in the same order. " Expressed in equation form: if A > B, then (A+C) > ( B+C).
We submit BD's Unified Theory of Human Inequality:
If G2 > G1 where G represents the Genetics for Higher IQ and Responsible Non-violent, Non-criminal Behavior,
and E represents the Best Applied Nurture and Environment Resources, then the resulting Human Outcomes can be
expressed as: (G2 + E) > (G1 + E). In other words, you can apply the best environments/nurture to two genetically unequal human groups, and you will NEVER get equal human group outcomes. The American education system has trying unsuccessfully to violate this Fundamental Law for 50 years with predictable miserable results. Even greater resources have been devoted to the inferior group without appreciable benefit. It's why prisons and welfare rolls are
top-heavy with IQ-75z. You can't beat the mathematics: As Subrealism puts it, a simple mathematical law describes human struggles... *Indeed*.
lol, as always BD - your pleasure tickles us pink. It is when you're comfortably stimulated, confident in your wheelhouse, that you tend to do your very best work as our indispensable poster-child for simple.
Subrealism is school...accept no substitutes!
BD knew you would be simply thrilled with the Indispensable Simplicity of it....
E will never be a constant. What are the best applied nurture and environmental resources? Is the way this country is structured the best of possible structures? If lower classes are going to stay on the bottom why are the ones that try to help stymied? It's much easier to watch them fail since people on the bottom are just going to be what they are.
We have someone missing the good old days. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304367204579268301043949952
Perfect timing on this one Vic, thanks. It goes to the top in the morning.
lol, you'll get a more cogent answer if you ask him whether he's more frustrated by not having made it into Mensa, or, by having been cursed with a two-inch punisher between his legs. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/unique-everybody-else/201210/the-pseudoscience-race-differences-in-penis-size
Glad you brought that up, Vic. For each person the E required to maximize the outcome is, of course,
not known. It is different for each person depending on their G. But in the mathematical sense, E can be viewed analogous to the Constant of Integration in Calculus - for each application of the solution, the Constant is evaluated to satisfy the Boundary Conditions. If you did somehow know the E for each person to maximize their G potential, then the basic inequality equation would absolutely hold. Just consider that E is established to maximize the outcome for each particular G.
When considering the validity of an equation, it is instructive to examine extreme cases to see if the equation makes logical sense. For example, suppose the human group in question is the set of all Down Syndrome subjects - IQ averages ~60. (really poor G). No conceivable set of E wiil ever produce an outcome group that can live independently, non-parasitic, and productive. With few exceptions, most Down subjects will require cradle-to-grave monitoring and support - the least desirable group outcome
possible.....
Have you heard of Paulo Freire? http://www.users.humboldt.edu/jwpowell/edreformFriere_pedagogy.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Freire
Lol, that's pretty cold.
Post a Comment