tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post6931825164100303758..comments2024-01-19T04:29:08.081-06:00Comments on subrealism: simple mathematical law describes human struggles...,Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-79170497070489912992013-12-23T20:52:42.015-06:002013-12-23T20:52:42.015-06:00Lol, that's pretty cold.Lol, that's pretty cold.Vic78noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-81098862495789001492013-12-23T20:27:30.480-06:002013-12-23T20:27:30.480-06:00Have you heard of Paulo Freire? http://www.users....Have you heard of Paulo Freire? http://www.users.humboldt.edu/jwpowell/edreformFriere_pedagogy.pdf<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Freire<br />Vic78noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-39079858403693802922013-12-23T19:02:02.227-06:002013-12-23T19:02:02.227-06:00Glad you brought that up, Vic. For each person th...Glad you brought that up, Vic. For each person the E required to maximize the outcome is, of course,<br />not known. It is different for each person depending on their G. But in the mathematical sense, E can be viewed analogous to the Constant of Integration in Calculus - for each application of the solution, the Constant is evaluated to satisfy the Boundary Conditions. If you did somehow know the E for each person to maximize their G potential, then the basic inequality equation would absolutely hold. Just consider that E is established to maximize the outcome for each particular G.<br /><br />When considering the validity of an equation, it is instructive to examine extreme cases to see if the equation makes logical sense. For example, suppose the human group in question is the set of all Down Syndrome subjects - IQ averages ~60. (really poor G). No conceivable set of E wiil ever produce an outcome group that can live independently, non-parasitic, and productive. With few exceptions, most Down subjects will require cradle-to-grave monitoring and support - the least desirable group outcome<br />possible.....BigDonOnenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-26207959540118332212013-12-23T18:39:11.930-06:002013-12-23T18:39:11.930-06:00lol, you'll get a more cogent answer if you as...lol, you'll get a more cogent answer if you ask him whether he's more frustrated by not having made it into Mensa, or, by having been cursed with a two-inch punisher between his legs. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/unique-everybody-else/201210/the-pseudoscience-race-differences-in-penis-sizeCNuhttp://subrealism.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-64211329245512609432013-12-23T18:34:13.116-06:002013-12-23T18:34:13.116-06:00Perfect timing on this one Vic, thanks. It goes to...Perfect timing on this one Vic, thanks. It goes to the top in the morning.CNuhttp://subrealism.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-60253146245048138712013-12-23T17:53:50.349-06:002013-12-23T17:53:50.349-06:00We have someone missing the good old days. http:/...We have someone missing the good old days. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304367204579268301043949952 Vic78noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-68888620395986479822013-12-23T12:07:29.942-06:002013-12-23T12:07:29.942-06:00E will never be a constant. What are the best app...E will never be a constant. What are the best applied nurture and environmental resources? Is the way this country is structured the best of possible structures? If lower classes are going to stay on the bottom why are the ones that try to help stymied? It's much easier to watch them fail since people on the bottom are just going to be what they are.Vic78noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-12840332594161967512013-12-23T10:20:42.300-06:002013-12-23T10:20:42.300-06:00BD knew you would be simply thrilled with the Indi...BD knew you would be simply thrilled with the Indispensable Simplicity of it....BigDonOnenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-68081545789962291992013-12-23T09:14:04.008-06:002013-12-23T09:14:04.008-06:00lol, as always BD - your pleasure tickles us pink....lol, as always BD - your pleasure tickles us pink. It is when you're comfortably stimulated, confident in your wheelhouse, that you tend to do your very best work as our indispensable poster-child for simple. <br /><br />Subrealism is school...accept no substitutes!CNuhttp://subrealism.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-75952454823617613992013-12-23T08:18:51.229-06:002013-12-23T08:18:51.229-06:00BD is pleased that Subrealism has raised the issue...BD is pleased that Subrealism has raised the issue of describing human conflict by mathematics. <br />A fundamental axiom in the mathematics of inequalities states, "If equals are added to unequals, the results obtained are unequal in the same order. " Expressed in equation form: if A > B, then (A+C) > ( B+C).<br /><br />We submit BD's <b>Unified Theory of Human Inequality: </b><br />If G2 > G1 where G represents the Genetics for Higher IQ and Responsible Non-violent, Non-criminal Behavior, <br />and E represents the Best Applied Nurture and Environment Resources, then the resulting Human Outcomes can be<br />expressed as: (G2 + E) > (G1 + E). In other words, <b>you can apply the best environments/nurture to two genetically unequal human groups, and you will NEVER get equal human group outcomes</b>. The American education system has trying unsuccessfully to violate this Fundamental Law for 50 years with predictable miserable results. Even greater resources have been devoted to the inferior group without appreciable benefit. It's why prisons and welfare rolls are<br />top-heavy with IQ-75z. You can't beat the mathematics: As Subrealism puts it, <i>a simple mathematical law describes human struggles...</i> *Indeed*.BigDonOnenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11539837.post-79712909118188224022013-12-23T03:44:13.461-06:002013-12-23T03:44:13.461-06:00Have your elite media courtesans begun sharpening ...Have your elite media courtesans begun sharpening their claws for one another? http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/23/business/media/when-60-minutes-checks-its-journalistic-skepticism-at-the-door.htmlwoodensplinternoreply@blogger.com