NYTimes | If you traffic in opinions, as a pro or an amateur, you’d better have
opinions about inequality. And so I set off into the intramural
battlefield to see what’s up.
For starters, economic inequality is manifestly real, growing and
dangerous. The gulf between the penthouse and the projects is obscenely
wide. Obama cited some of the startling numbers: The top 10 percent of
Americans used to take in a third of the national income. Now they
gobble up half. The typical corporate C.E.O. used to make 30 times as
much as the average worker. Now the boss makes 270 times as much as the
minion. Many factors have led to this trend, including the offshoring of
work to low-paid foreign labor, the automation of everything from
manufacturing to meter-reading, a tax code that allows the accumulation
of riches at the top, the slow growth of educational attainment, the
demise of strong unions, a collapse of the social contract.
The alarming thing is not inequality per se, but immobility. It’s not
just that we have too many poor people, but that they are stranded in
poverty with long odds against getting out. The rich (and their
children) stay rich, the poor (and their children) stay poor. President
Obama’s speech on Dec. 4, widely characterized as his inequality speech,
was actually billed by the White House as a speech on economic
mobility. The equality he urged us to strive for was not equality of
wealth but equality of opportunity.
A stratified society in which the bottom and top are mostly locked in
place is not just morally offensive; it is unstable. Recessions are more
frequent in such countries. A widely praised 2012 book, “Why Nations
Fail,” argues that historically when the ruling elites have pulled up
the ladder and kept newcomers from getting a foothold, their economies
have suffocated and died. “The most pernicious fact of inequality is
when it translates into political inequality,” said Daron Acemoglu, a
co-author of the book and a Massachusetts Institute of Technology
economist. “That means our democracy ceases to function because some
people have so much money they command greater power.” The rich spend
heavily on lobbyists and campaign donations to secure tax breaks and
tariff advantages and bailouts that perpetuate their status. Not only
does a dynamic economy stagnate, but the left-out citizenry becomes
disillusioned and cynical. Sound familiar?
0 comments:
Post a Comment