McCain did graduate at the bottom of his class, 894 out of 899...crashed three very expensive Navy jets...two in training...A “war hero” doesn’t get promoted to squadron commander of the air field named after his own grandfather; immediately after crashing his third airplane. A “war hero” doesn’t have all military records that cover his time in Vietnam and all disciplinary actions against him censored and sealed “as a matter of national security.” A “war hero” doesn’t get 28 medals awarded “for bravery” for no other reason than being shot down and captured. A war hero doesn't allow himself to be used as a pawn and go on a celebrity public relations tour, because he’s the son of two acclaimed Navy admirals. A war hero doesn't repeatedly try to send other people's son's into war and harms way. A “war hero” doesn’t repeatedly cheat on the wife who dutifully waited for him at home and then divorce and abandon her. A "war hero" doesn't unleash the consummate tard's tard Sarah Palin on a unsuspecting American public.
17 comments:
Trump putting on a tour de force of what it sounded like back in the day when there was much more bass in voices all around the political spectrumTrump did not just attack McCain. The former host of Celebrity Apprentice also took a populist note in going after the current system of campaign finance. The real-estate mogul defended his long history of political contributions to both parties as influence-buying: “I give to
everybody and they do whatever I say,” he said.
He used this to note his independence from special interests and attacked the massive fundraising tallies achieved by Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton.
“Those people are controlled by whoever gave them their money, and I will tell you they are totally controlled,” he said.Why the bought and paid for establishment media is busy scrambling trying to shame and marginalize him. If he keeps it up, he's going to wreck the entire tissue-paper thin spectacle that is permitted political discourse in America. http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/18/donald-trump-john-mccain-vietnam-iowa-republicans
Bass voice? Funny how pinche gringo Trump shat out a few cum-filled condoms when El Chapo purportedly tweeted at him.
El Chapo is a CIA backed, deep state threat to the old-line status quo in Mexico. That's enough to become a little worried about. Trump's not in the gangster business, after all. He's just got enough in his pocket to say whatever he wants and get away with it with only a public death threat on his ledger.
--Cowardice Item-- For comparison, of course, you have those folks who never even served in the military but have enjoyed all the benefits of that military protection...
N-1 sacralization of the military and the warsocialist state stands head and shoulders above every other flavor of stupid. Not that a lifelong, elderly beneficiary of warsocialism is likely to ever recognize or acknowledge that truth.
Trump was entirely correct about Vietnam. A stupid, pointless spate of killing from which the country derived no profit whatsoever.
YOU speak of LEADERSHIP.
I speak of the original topic of this particular post.
My version of "Picking On You" is drawn from your reference to "Bill O'Reilly's Sexual Abuse Victim". You have to admit that it is quite strange for someone to know the name of such an obscure person UNLESS he traffics in media sources that are doing "Opposition Resear
You're a fucking idiot. In the context of that topic, me bringing up O'Reilly's sexual harassment made perfect sense.
(Richard Simmons voice) "I'm gonna post my conversation on my blog." Word?
Viet Nam kept the fear of N-1 God in our enemies.
Speaking a bit closer to home, and certain of your ethnic interests, how much integration of the South would have ever occurred without the National Guard...??!
Ole Miss below...
and you need a Boeing B-52 stratofortress for which part of domestic law enforcement?
That's a good idea, CNu. A smell of napalm in the morning might put a stop to that Baltimore/Ferguson Apocalypse75-style nonsense....
I was thinking about your military service BD and concluded that the most fearsome thing you ever fought was a fried baloney sandwich in the mess hall. You had to fight it going in, and then, on its way out again. Explains why you spend so much time at Subrealism, keeps you regular. Sadly, we all have to suffer the legendary quantities of hot fried baloney you're continually blowing out your ass....,
At the risk of giving Dale some more search fodder for BD's identity, the image below for BD's American Legion membership is provided. Active duty military service during wrtime is a requirement for membership https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Legion#Membership
Prvious post didnt upload image....
So, was that for the War between the States?
Thank you Brother Makheru Bradley.
With your comment there NOW I UNDERSTAND YOUR MISTAKEN ASSUMPTION.
I guess my dear friend "BET Uncut" was right about me. I am constantly debating an "Imaginary Black Progressive". So if you look at my blog, for example, you see a DARK MATTER ANALYSIS to a propaganda piece from "The Root.com".
The Root tells of her fear of "Driving While Black" in response to the incident in Walker County Texas - which I see YOU HAVE TAKEN UP ON YOUR BLOG.
Again proving that they are EQUAL HISTORIANS, able to draw up a fraudulent narrative that has a subset of the truth - no different than what ole George, Thomas or Benjamin managed to do - The Root DID NOT FEEL THE NEED to connect spiritually with the BLACK WOMEN MURDERED AT TRANSIT STOPS around America this year, because they died in circumstances that DID NOT FIT THEIR AGENDA.
So while you pan my choice to use the "Black Women Seen Crying On The Evening News" meme - YOU STILL DON'T GET IT!!!!!
I am just ONE NEGRO who troubles you so, yet there is an ENTIRE, WELL FINANCED INDUSTRY that is blowing MENTHOLATED SMOKE at the masses of BLACK PEOPLE, whose work product is FAR MORE EFFECTIVE and DAMAGING than anything that you assume that I am doing to inject carcinogens into the Negro.
Credit to The Root.com they are MORE DIRECT in the ride that they give you.
Maybe I need a journalism course to be more concise. Then you, my dear friend CNu and a few others would get past the "English Lessons" of my arguments and focus upon the SUBSTANCE.
You know CF... Sometimes I agree with you. It's just that it takes several readings of your cacophony of caps lock writing style and tangents before I think I understand what it is that you are trying to convey. Assume that everyone here is smart (or dumb) and just make it plain. People are busy.
Notice that you did not answer #1 - the one that would draw out YOUR AGENDA.
Instead you chose to answer #2 - the one that requires a "Defriending" on Linked In.
MY AGENDA - this is school. Man 1, 2, 3 has no will, only self-will and wilfulness. Try to
understand what it means. Wilful means when one wants or does something
forbidden, because it is forbidden. Self-will is, for instance, when
someone sees you are trying to do something you don't know how to do
and wants to help you, but you say, 'No, I will do it myself. These are
the two types of will we have. They are based on opposition. Real will
must depend on consciousness, knowledge and permanent 'I'. Such as we
are, we have not got it. All we have is self-will and wilfulness. Our
will is a resultant of desires. Desires may be very well hidden. For
instance, a man may want to criticise someone, and calls it sincerity.
But the desire to do so may be so strong that he must make a really big
effort to stop it, and a man cannot make real efforts by himself.
In order to create will, man must try to co-ordinate his every action
with ideas of the work; he must in every action ask himself: how will
it look from the point of view of the work? Is it useful or harmful to
me, or to the work? If he does not know, he can ask. If a man has been
long in the work, there is practically not a single action that does
not touch upon the work—there are no independent actions. In that way
one is not free, in the sense that one cannot act foolishly and without
discrimination. One must think before one acts.
Post a Comment