off-guardian | We have been given a very clear narrative about the declared coronavirus
pandemic. The UK State has passed legislation, in the form of the
Coronavirus Act, to compel people to self isolate and practice social distancing in order to delay the spread of SARS-CoV-2 (SC2). We are told this “lockdown”,
a common prison term, is essential. We are also told that SC2 has been
clearly identified to be the virus which causes the COVID 19 syndrome.
At the time of writing SC2
is said to have infected 60,733 people with 7,097 people supposedly
dying of COVID 19 in the UK. This case fatality ration (CFR) of 11.7% is
seemingly one of the worst in the world. Furthermore, with just 135 people recovered, the recovery rate in the UK is inexplicably low.
Some reading this may baulk at use of words like “seemingly” and “alleged” in
reference to these statistics. The mainstream media (MSM) have been
leading the charge to cast anyone who questions the State’s coronavirus
narrative as putting lives at risk. The claim being that
questioning what we are told by the State, its officials and the MSM
undermines the lockdown. The lockdown is, we are told, essential to save
lives.
It is possible both to support the precautionary principle and
question the lockdown. Questioning the scientific and statistical
evidence base, supposedly justifying the complete removal of our civil
liberties, does not mean those doing so care nothing for their fellow
citizens. On the contrary, many of us are extremely concerned about the
impact of the lockdown on everyone. It is desperately sad to see people
blindly support their own house arrest while attacking anyone who
questions the necessity for it.
The knee jerk reaction, assuming any questioning of the lockdown
demonstrates a cavalier, uncaring disregard is puerile. Grown adults
shouldn’t simply believe everything they are told like mindless idiots.
Critical thinking and asking questions is never “bad” under any circumstances whatsoever.
Only the State, with the unwavering support of its MSM propaganda
operation, enforces unanimity of thought. If a system cannot withstand
questioning it suggests it is built upon shaky foundation
is and probably
not worth maintaining. Yet perhaps it is what we are not told that is
more telling.
Among the many things we are not told is how many lives the lockdown will ruin and end prematurely. Are these lives irrelevant?
We are not told the evidence for the existence of a virus called
SARS-CoV-2 is highly questionable and the tests for it unreliable; we
are not told that the numbers of deaths reportedly caused by COVID 19 is
statistically vague, seemingly deliberately so; we are not told that
these deaths are well within the normal range of excess winter mortality
and we are not told that in previous years excess winter deaths have
been higher than they are now.
We didn’t need to destroy the economy in response to those, far worse, periods of loss so why do we need to do so for this?
0 comments:
Post a Comment