strategic-culture | In Tempetes Microbiennes,
Patrick Zylberman, a professor of History of Health in Paris, detailed
the complex process through which health security, so far at the margins
of political strategies, was sneaking into center stage in the early
2000s. The WHO had already set the precedent in 2005, warning about “50
million deaths” around the world caused by the incoming swine flu. In
the worst-case scenario projected for a pandemic, Zylberman predicted
that “sanitary terror” would be used as an instrument of governance.
That worst-case scenario has been revamped
as we speak. The notion of a generalized obligatory confinement is not
warranted by any medical justification, or leading epidemiological
research, when it comes to fighting a pandemic. Still, that was
enshrined as the hegemonic policy – with the inevitable corollary of
countless masses plunged into unemployment. All that based on failed,
delirious mathematical models of the Imperial College kind, imposed by
powerful pressure groups ranging from the World Economic Forum (WEF) to
the Munich Security Conference.
Enter Dr. Richard Hatchett, a former member of the National Security
Council during the first Bush Jr. administration, who was already
recommending obligatory confinement of the whole population way back in
2001. Hatchett now directs the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness
Innovations (CEPI), a very powerful entity coordinating global vaccine
investment, and very cozy with Big Pharma. CEPI happens to be a
brainchild of the WEF in conjunction with the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation.
Crucially, Hatchett regards the fight against Covid-19 as a “war”.
The terminology – adopted by everyone from President Trump to President
Macron – gives away the game. It harks back to – what else – the global
war on terror (GWOT), as solemnly announced in September 2001 by Donald “Known Unknowns” Rumsfeld himself.
Rumsfeld, crucially, had been the chairman of
biotech giant Gilead. After 9/11, at the Pentagon, he got busy aiming
to blur the distinction between civilians and the military when it came
to GWOT. That’s when “generalized obligatory confinement” was
conceptualized, with Hatchett among the key players.
As much as this was a militarized Big Pharma spin-off concept, it had
nothing to do with public health. What mattered was the militarization
of American society to be adopted in response to bioterror – at the time
automatically attributed to a squalid, tech-deprived al-Qaeda.
The current version of this project – we are at “war” and every
civilian must stay at home – takes the form of what Alexander Dugin has
defined as a medical-military dictatorship.
Hatchett is very much part of the group, alongside ubiquitous Anthony
Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases (NIAID), very close to WHO, WEF and the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, and Robert Redfield, director of the U.S. chapter of the
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Further applications inbuilt in the project will include all-around
digital surveillance, sold as health monitoring. Already implemented in
the current narrative is the non-stop demonization of China, “guilty” of
all things Covid-19-related. That is inherited from another tried and
tested war game – the Red Dawn scheme.
0 comments:
Post a Comment