asiatimes | Fasten your seat belts: the US hybrid war against China is bound to go on frenetic overdrive, as economic reports are already identifying Covid-19 as the tipping point when the Asian – actually Eurasian – century truly began.
The US strategy remains, essentially, full spectrum dominance, with
the National Security Strategy obsessed by the three top “threats” of
China, Russia and Iran. China, in contrast, proposes a “community of shared destiny” for mankind, mostly addressing the Global South.
The predominant US narrative in the ongoing information war is now
set in stone: Covid-19 was the result of a leak from a Chinese
biowarfare lab. China is responsible. China lied. And China has to
pay.
The new normal tactic of non-stop China demonization is deployed not
only by crude functionaries of the
industrial-military-surveillance-media complex. We need to dig much
deeper to discover how these attitudes are deeply embedded in Western
thinking – and later migrated to the “end of history” United States.
(Here are sections of an excellent study, Unfabling the East: The Enlightenment’s Encounter with Asia , by Jurgen Osterhammel).
Only Whites civilized
Way beyond the Renaissance, in the 17th and 18th centuries,
whenever Europe referred to Asia it was essentially about religion
conditioning trade. Christianity reigned supreme, so it was impossible
to think by excluding God.
At the same time the doctors of the Church were deeply disturbed that
in the Sinified world a very well organized society could function in
the absence of a transcendent religion. That bothered them even more
than those “savages” discovered in the Americas.
As it started to explore what was regarded as the “Far East,” Europe
was mired in religious wars. But at the same time it was forced to
confront another explanation of the world, and that fed some subversive
anti-religious tendencies across the Enlightenment sphere.
It was at this stage that learned Europeans started questioning
Chinese philosophy, which inevitably they had to degrade to the status
of a mere worldly “wisdom” because it escaped the canons of Greek and
Augustinian thought. This attitude, by the way, still reigns today.
0 comments:
Post a Comment