strategic-culture | Amidst the storm of controversy raised by the lab-origin theory of
COVID-19 extolled by such figures as Nobel prize winning virologist Luc
Montagnier, bioweapons expert Francis Boyle, Sri Lankan Cardinal Malcolm
Ranjith and the head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, an elaborate
project was undertaken under the nominal helm of NATURE Magazine in
order to refute the claim once and for all under the report ‘The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2’.
This project was led by a team of evolutionary virologists using a
line of reasoning that “random mutation can account for anything” and
was parroted loudly and repeatedly by Fauci, WHO officials and Bill
Gates in order to shut down all uncomfortable discussion of the possible
laboratory origins of COVID-19 while also pushing for a global vaccine
campaign. On April 18, Dr. Fauci (whose close ties with Bill Gates, and
Big Pharma have much to do with his control of hundreds of billions of
dollars of research money), stated:
“There was a study recently that we can
make available to you, where a group of highly qualified evolutionary
virologists looked at the sequences there and the sequences in bats as
they evolve. And the mutations that it took to get to the point where it
is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to
a human.”
I think at this moment, rife as it is with speculative arguments,
confusion and under-defined data, it is useful to remove oneself from
the present and look for higher reference points from which we can
re-evaluate events now unfolding on the world stage.
In order to do this, let us begin by asking a new series of questions:
What is Nature Magazine exactly? Is it truly an “objective” platform
for pure scientific research untainted by the filth of political
agendas? Is this standard-bearer of “proper method”, which can make or
break the career of any scientist, truly the scientific journal it
claims to be or is there something darker to be discovered?
As I presented a part of this story in my previous installment in this series The Rise of Optical Biophysics and Clash of the Two Sciences, a very old battle has been waged around political systems but also what sort of scientific paradigms will shape our future.
0 comments:
Post a Comment