libcom | It was in the ideological sphere as well that the third major protest,
that against massification of the black community, was resolved.
Although authentic Afro-American particularity had been undermined by
the standardizing imperatives of mass capitalism, the black nationalist
reaction paved the way for the constitution of an artificial
particularity.[44] Residual
idiomatic and physical traits, bereft of any distinctive content, were
injected with racial stereotypes and the ordinary petit bourgeois
Weltanschauung to create the pretext for an apparently unique black
existence. A thoroughly ideological construction of black uniqueness —
which was projected universally in the mass market as black culture —
fulfilled at least three major functions. First, as a marketing device
it facilitated the huckstering of innumerable commodities designed to
enhance, embellish, or glorify "blackness".[45]
Second, artificial black particularity provided the basis for the myth
of genuine black community and consequently legitimated the organization
of the black population into an administrative unit — and, therefore,
the black elite's claims to primacy. Finally, the
otherness-without-negativity provided by the ideologized blackness can
be seen as a potential antidote to the new contradictions generated by
monopoly capitalism's bureaucratic rationality. By constituting an
independently given sector of society responsive to administrative
controls, the well-managed but recalcitrant black community justifies
the existence of the administrative apparatus and legitimates existing
forms of social integration.
In one sense, the decade and a half of black activism was a
phenomenon vastly more significant than black activists appreciated
while in another sense it was far less significant than has been
claimed.[46] As an emancipatory project for the Afro-American
population, the "movement" — especially after the abolishment of
segregation — had little impact beyond strengthening the existing elite
strata. Yet, as part of a program of advanced capitalist reconstruction,
black activism contributed to thawing the Cold War and outlined a model
to replace it.
By the latter 1960s the New Deal coalition had become obsolete and it
was no longer able to fully integrate recalcitrant social strata such
as the black population.[47] The
New Deal coalition initiated the process of social homogenization and
depoliticization Marcuse described as one dimensionality. As Piccone
observes, however, by the 1960s the transition to monopoly capitalism
had been fully carried out and the whole strategy had become
counterproductive.[48] The drive
toward homogenization and the total domination of the commodity form had
deprived the system of the "otherness" required both to restrain the
irrational tendencies of bureaucratic rationality and to locate
lingering and potentially disruptive elements. Notwithstanding their
vast differences, the ethnic "liberation struggles" and counterculture
activism on the one side and the "hard hat" reaction on the other, were
two sides of the same rejection of homogenization. Not only did these
various positions challenge the one-dimensional order, but their very
existence betrayed the inability of the toally administered society to
pacify social existence while at the same time remaining sufficiently
dynamic.
The development of black activism from spontaneous protest through
mass mobilization to system support indicated the arrival of a new era
of domination based on domesticating negativity by organizing spaces in
which it could be legitimately expressed. Rather than suppressing
opposition, the social system now creates its own. The proliferation of
government generated reference groups in addition to ethnic ones (the
old, the young, battered wives, the handicapped, veterans, retarded and
gifted children, etc.)[49] and the
appearance of legions of "watchdog" agencies, reveal the extent to
which the system manufactures and markets its own illusory opposition.
What makes the "age of artificial negativity" possible is the
overwhelming success of the process of massification undertaken since
the Depression and in response to it. Universal fragmentation of
consciousness, with the corollary decline in the ability to think
critically and the regimentation of an alienated everyday life[50]
set the stage for new forms of domination built in the very texture of
organization. In mass society, organized activity on a large scale
requires hierarchization. Along with hierarchy, however, the social
management logic also comes into being to (1) protect existing
privileges by delivering realizable, if inconsequential, payoffs and (2)
to legitimate the administrative rationality as a valid and efficient
model. To the extent that the organization strives to ground itself on
the mass it is already integrated into the system of domination. The
shibboleths which comprise its specific platform make little difference.
What is important is that the organization reproduces the manipulative
hierarchy and values typical of contemporary capitalism.
Equally important for the existence of this social-managerial form is
that the traditional modes of opposition to capitalism have not been
able to successfully negotiate the transition from entrepreneurial to
administrative capitalism. Thus, the left has not fully grasped the
recent shifts in the structure of domination and continues to organize
resistance along the very lines which reinforce the existing social
order. As a consequence, the opposition finds itself perpetually
outflanked. Unable to deliver the goods — political or otherwise — the
left collapses before the cretinization of its own constituency. Once
the mass model is accepted, cretinization soon follows and from that
point the opposition loses any genuine negativity. The Civil Rights and
Black Power movements prefigured the coming of this new age; the
feminist photocopy of the black road to nowhere was its farcical re-run.
0 comments:
Post a Comment