mcclatcheydc | Even before a former U.S. intelligence contractor exposed the secret
collection of Americans’ phone records, the Obama administration was
pressing a government-wide crackdown on security threats that requires
federal employees to keep closer tabs on their co-workers and exhorts
managers to punish those who fail to report their suspicions.
President Barack Obama’s unprecedented initiative, known
as the Insider Threat Program, is sweeping in its reach. It has
received scant public attention even though it extends beyond the U.S.
national security bureaucracies to most federal departments and agencies
nationwide, including the Peace Corps, the Social Security
Administration and the Education and Agriculture departments. It
emphasizes leaks of classified material, but catchall definitions of
“insider threat” give agencies latitude to pursue and penalize a range
of other conduct.
Government documents reviewed by McClatchy
illustrate how some agencies are using that latitude to pursue
unauthorized disclosures of any information, not just classified
material. They also show how millions of federal employees and
contractors must watch for “high-risk persons or behaviors” among
co-workers and could face penalties, including criminal charges, for
failing to report them. Leaks to the media are equated with espionage.
“Hammer this fact home . . . leaking is tantamount to aiding the
enemies of the United States,” says a June 1, 2012, Defense Department
strategy for the program that was obtained by McClatchy.
The
Obama administration is expected to hasten the program’s implementation
as the government grapples with the fallout from the leaks of top secret
documents by Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency
contractor who revealed the agency’s secret telephone data collection
program. The case is only the latest in a series of what the government
condemns as betrayals by “trusted insiders” who have harmed national
security.
“Leaks related to national security can put people at
risk,” Obama said on May 16 in defending criminal investigations into
leaks. “They can put men and women in uniform that I’ve sent into the
battlefield at risk. They can put some of our intelligence officers, who
are in various, dangerous situations that are easily compromised, at
risk. . . . So I make no apologies, and I don’t think the American
people would expect me as commander in chief not to be concerned about
information that might compromise their missions or might get them
killed.
0 comments:
Post a Comment