NYTimes | The director of the National Security Agency
told Congress on Wednesday that “dozens” of terrorism threats had been
halted by the agency’s huge database of the logs of nearly every
domestic phone call made by Americans, while a senator briefed on the
program disclosed that the telephone records are destroyed after five
years.
The director, Gen. Keith B. Alexander, who heads both the N.S.A. and
United States Cyber Command, which runs the military’s offensive and
defensive use of cyberweapons, told skeptical members of the Senate
Appropriations Committee that his agency was doing exactly what Congress
authorized after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
General Alexander said he welcomed debate over the legal justification
for the program because “what we’re doing to protect American citizens
here is the right thing.” He said the agency “takes great pride in
protecting this nation and our civil liberties and privacy” under the
oversight of Congress and the courts.
“We aren’t trying to hide it,” he said. “We’re trying to protect
America. So we need your help in doing that. This isn’t something that’s
just N.S.A. or the administration doing it on its own. This is what our
nation expects our government to do for us.”
But in his spirited exchanges with committee members, notably Senator
Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, General Alexander said he was
seeking to declassify many details about the program now that they have
been leaked by Edward J. Snowden, a former N.S.A. contractor who came
forward to say he was the source of documents about the phone log
program and other classified matters.
Daily Caller: So what are they doing with all of this information? If they can’t stop the Boston marathon bombing, what are they doing with it?
Binney: Well again, they’re putting an extra burden on all of their analysts. It’s not something that’s going to help them; it’s something that’s burdensome. There are ways to do the analysis properly, but they don’t really want the solution because if they got it, they wouldn’t be able to keep demanding the money to solve it. I call it their business statement, “Keep the problems going so the money keeps flowing.” It’s all about contracts and money.
Daily Caller: But isn’t data collection getting easier and processing speeds getting faster and data collection cheaper? Isn’t the falling price one of the reasons they can collect data at this massive level?
Binney: Yes, but that’s not the issue. The issue is, can you figure out what’s important in it? And figure out the intentions and capabilities of the people you’re monitoring? And they are in no way prepared to do that, because that takes analysis. That’s what the big data initiative was all about out of the White House last year. It was to try to get algorithms and figure out what’s important and tell the people what’s important so that they can find things. The probability of them finding what’s really there is low.
0 comments:
Post a Comment