technologyreview | “I honestly don’t know what people are waiting for,” says
microbiologist Chad Roy of Tulane University in the US. “It doesn’t take
WHO coming out to make a proclamation that it’s airborne for us to
appreciate this is an airborne disease. I don’t know how much clearer it
needs to be in terms of scientific evidence.”
So what does
“airborne” really mean in this context? It’s basically an issue of size.
We’re pretty sure that SARS-CoV-2 is spread through tiny droplets that
contain viral particles capable of leading to an infection. For a virus
to be airborne, however, means a few different things, depending on the
expert you’re talking to. Typically it means it can spread via
inhalation over long distances, perhaps even through different rooms, of
small particles known as aerosols.
“That’s why when you ask some of the professionals if the virus is
airborne, they’ll say it’s not, because we’re not seeing transmission
over those sorts of distances,” says Lisa Brosseau, a retired professor
of public health who still consults for businesses and organizations.
There
is also some debate on what we mean by “aerosol.” The droplets that
carry viral particles through the air can come in all sorts of sizes,
but while the larger ones will drop quickly to the ground or other
surfaces, the smaller ones (just a few microns across) can linger in the
air for a while, giving them a chance to be inhaled. The word is mostly
used to describe these smaller particles, although Brosseau would
prefer the term “aerosol transmission” to cover the entire gamut of
inhalable viral particles being expelled into the air—large and small
alike.
If SARS-CoV-2 is airborne, it’s far from the only
disease. Measles is notorious for being able to last in the air for up
to two hours. Tuberculosis, though a bacterium, can be airborne for six hours, and Brosseau suggests that coronavirus superspreaders (people
who seem to eject a larger amount of the virus than others) disseminate
the virus in patterns that recall the infectiousness of tuberculosis.
Brosseau, however, says that though masks can limit the spread of
larger particles, they are less helpful for smaller ones, especially if
they fit only loosely. “I wish we would stop relying on the idea that
face coverings are going to solve everything and help flatten the
curve,” she says. “It’s magical thinking—it’s not going to happen.” For
masks to really make a difference, they would need to be worn all the
time, even around family.
Brosseau does believe the evidence is
trending toward the conclusion that airborne transmission is “the
primary and possibly most important mode of transmission for
SARS-CoV-2.” She says, “I think the amount of time and effort devoted to
sanitizing every single surface over and over and over again has been a
huge waste of time. We don’t need to worry so much about cleaning every
single surface we touch.” Instead, the focus should be on other
factors, like where we spend our time.
0 comments:
Post a Comment