Because I've cultivated a baseline of vague digust until disproven or aesthetically overcome - the social distancing for health program doesn't work on me at all. But I'm curious to know if any of you feel any differently about these humans after several months of the social distancing programme? Part of this I really do understand, because for me personally, disgust is the immediate and acute precursor to violence. If you can make these humans all a priori disgusted with one another....,
off-guardian | Western civilization, led by the US government and
media, has embarked upon a campaign of mass psychological terrorism
designed to cover for the collapsing economy, set up a new pretext for
Wall Street’s ongoing plunder expedition, radically escalate the police
state, deeply traumatize people into submission to total social
conformity, and radically aggravate the anti-social, anti-human
atomization of the people.
The pretext for this abomination is an epidemic which objectively is
comparable to the seasonal flu and is caused by the same kind of
Coronavirus we’ve endured so long without totalitarian rampages and mass
insanity.
The global evidence is converging on the facts: This flu is somewhat
more contagious than the norm and is especially dangerous for those who
are aged and already in poor health from pre-existing maladies. It is
not especially dangerous for the rest of the population.
The whole concept of “lockdowns” is exactly upside down, exactly the
wrong way any sane society would respond to this circumstance.
It’s the vulnerable who should be shielded while nature takes its
course among the general population, who should go about life as usual.
Dominionist-technocratic rigidity can’t prevent an epidemic from cycling
through the population in spite of the delusions of that religion,
especially since Western societies began their measures far too late
anyway.
So it’s best to let herd immunity develop as fast as it naturally
will, at which time the virus recedes from lack of hosts (and is likely
to mutate in a milder direction along the way). This is the only way to
bring a safer environment for all including the most vulnerable.
The fact that most societies have rejected the sane, scientific route
in favor of doomed-to-fail attempts at a forcible violent segregation
and sterilization is proof that governments aren’t concerned with the
public health (as if we didn’t know that already from a thousand
policies of poisoning the environment while gutting the health care
system), but are very ardent to use this crisis they artificially
generated in order radically to escalate their police state power toward
totalitarian goals.
The whole concept of self-isolation and anti-social “distancing” is
radically anti-human. We evolved over millions of years to be social
creatures living in tight-knit groups. Although modern societies
ideologically and socioeconomically work to massify and atomize people,
nevertheless almost all of us still seek close human companionship in
our lives.
(I suspect most of the internet police-state-mongers are not only
fascists at heart but are confirmed misanthropic loners who couldn’t
care less about human closeness.)
This terror campaign seeks to blast to pieces any remaining human
closeness, which means any remaining humanity as such, the better to
isolate individual atoms for subjection to total domination. Arendt
wrote profoundly on this goal of totalitarian governments, though even
she didn’t envision a state-driven cult of the literal physical
repulsion of every atom from every other atom.
So far the people are submitting completely to a terror campaign
dedicated to the total eradication of whatever community was left in the
world, and especially whatever community was starting to be rebuilt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment