Time | In spring, as Colombia settled into a nationwide COVID-19
lockdown, some Colombians received troubling new guidelines—and not
from the government. In remote parts of 11 of the country’s 32 states,
armed groups began enforcing their own quarantine measures, according to a report published July 15 by Human Rights Watch.
Through pamphlets and WhatsApp messages, the groups laid out curfews,
restrictions on movement, categories of essential work, and more. These
restrictions were sometimes stricter than government rules, and
punishments for breaking them far more serious.
One pamphlet seen by HRW, released in early April by Marxist guerrillas the National Liberation Army (ELN)
in the northern Bolívar department, warned that fighters would be
“forced to kill people in order to preserve lives” because residents had
not “respected the orders to prevent Covid-19.”
Latin America is the current center of the pandemic, with more than 3.5 million cases across the region and numbers in many countries still rising sharply. Analysts say COVID-19 is worsening the region’s problem with “criminal governance” –
where the state loses control over a part of its territory as non-state
armed groups, such as drug gangs and guerrilla forces, take over and
effectively govern small areas. Groups in Colombia, Brazil,
Mexico and elsewhere have taken on the fight against COVID-19, allowing
them to claim an interest in the public good, and strengthen their
violent grip on local communities—in a way that could be permanent.
Which armed groups control territory in Latin America?
The nature of criminal governance varies hugely
between regions and countries across Latin America, according to Chris
Dalby, managing editor of investigative news site InSight Crime,
which examines organized crime in the region. But it tends to take
hold, he says, in poor or remote areas where the state presence is weak;
that is, where the government has failed to provide effective law
enforcement, public services, and economic opportunity.
In Colombia, armed groups are mostly a legacy of
the country’s decades-long conflict with rebel groups. Though the
Colombian government reached a landmark peace deal with the Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC)
in 2016, other guerrilla groups, including the ELN, and paramilitary
forces remain powerful in some rural areas. In Brazil, drug traffickers
exert more influence than the police in some of the favela neighborhoods
that lie on the outskirts of large cities, with the largest gang being
the First Capital Command (PCC) in São Paulo. In Mexico, drug cartels, such as the Sinaloa Cartel in the northwest of the country, have similar control over poor communities.
These distinct groups use their
territories for a range of illicit businesses: drug trafficking, people
trafficking, illegal mining, extortion rackets and more. But they often
also provide resources and public services for communities, as a way of
legitimizing their control and buying loyalty. During the pandemic, with
many money-making activities harder to carry out thanks to national
restrictions on movement and businesses, many groups have leaned into
this role of governing, Dalby says. “They’ve taken the opportunity to
reaffirm that control.”
In March, after COVID-19 started to spread through Brazil,
gangs in Rio de Janeiro favelas drove through streets using a
loudspeaker to tell residents they were putting a curfew in place and
threatening violence if they did not comply, according to Brazilian newspaper UOL. Traffickers reportedly also handed out hand soap, and issued edicts banning tourists
from entering the area in case they infect the residents. In Mexico, in
April, drug cartels handed out boxes of food and other basic supplies
to people struggling with the economic impact of the pandemic. Images
circulated in Latin American media showed packages branded with the names of cartels.
In Colombia, some armed groups implemented stricter
restrictions than the government did on people’s movement, humanitarian
workers and community leaders told HRW, allowing no exceptions for
accessing health services or banks during curfews, for example. People
who did not comply with the rules faced brutal punishments: HRW
documented at least 8 killings of civilians who apparently did not abide
by COVID-19 measures imposed by armed groups between March and June.
0 comments:
Post a Comment