harvardtothebighouse | Some of the dystopian carnage creeping across China may be due to
the fact that much of China’s population may have already been exposed
to coronavirus infection via SARS or other less notorious strains, which
would allow the Wuhan Stain COVID-19 to use antibody-dependent enhancement to much more efficiently enter into cells,
and then become much more virulent since this enhancement hijacks the
body’s preexisting immune response to coronavirus infections and allows
easier entry. However whether or not people have been exposed to a
coronavirus infection before, once it’s been circulating in a population
for long enough the Wuhan Strain may be able to reinfect its own past
hosts and use this molecular hijacking on antibodies left from its own
previous infection to become far more virulent, regardless of whether or
not someone has been exposed to other coronaviruses before COVID-19.
And early reporting from Chinese doctors indicates that re-infections of the Wuhan Strain are far more lethal than the first.
– Additionally, although
another since-retracted pre-print noted several very short genomic
sequences in COVID-19’s spike-protein gene that look far more similar to
sequences found in HIV than to other coronaviruses – critics
quickly pointed out that the shared homology didn’t reach statistical
significance. However a closer look at the data reveals that there were a
few small shared genomic segments that, despite being physically
separated from each other along each strand of DNA, all worked together
to code for the Wuhan Strain’s protein-spike’s crucial receptor binding
site. Something that is highly unlikely to have happened by chance. And
despite most of its protein-spike being shared with SARS, these
substituted segments weren’t shared at all – nor were they found in any
other coronavirus. One possible but likely reason for these HIV-like
segments is that they were meant to be epitopes, or molecular
flags meant to mark intruders for a vaccine to target. It is
mathematically possible for this to happen in nature – but only in a ten-thousand bats chained to ten-thousand Petri dishes and given until infinity sense. Alternatively, it could also be produced by infecting a room full of ferrets with a bespoke coronavirus vaccine and sifting through the wreckage for your genomic needle.
– Critics have brushed off the Wuhan Strain’s shared homology with
HIV as statistically insignificant, however clinical reporting indicates
that the Wuhan Strain may be using this shared HIV homology to attack
CD4 immune cells just like HIV does, as an unusually high percentage of patients are showing low white blood cell counts,
especially the sickest ones. This pathogenicity may well be due to the
unique HIV-live genomics of the Wuhan Strain, as one white-paper by
LSU’s professor emeritus of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology
who’s also a Harvard-educated virologist with a PhD in Microbiology and
Molecular Genetics notes: “This
is the first description of a possible immunosuppressive domain in
coronaviruses… The three key [mutations] common to the known
immunosuppressive domains are also in common with the sequence from [the
spike-protein]. While coronaviruses are not known for general
immunosuppression of the style shown by HIV-1, this does not rule out
immunosuppression at the site of active infection in the lung, which
would prolong and potentially worsen infection at that site.” And early research has indicated that this unique region may make COVID-19 up to 1,000 times more likely to bind to human cells than SARS.
– Even more troubling, a peer-reviewed study noted that one
particular part of the Wuhan Strain’s spike-protein genome also wasn’t
found in any of its relatives, “and may provide a gain-of-function to [COVID-19] for efficient spreading in the human population.”
And according to that paper, this particular type of furin cleavage
site makes similar viruses both more pathogenic and more neurotoxic.
– Evidence for the Wuhan Strain’s neurotoxicity arrived in late February, in a published paper which notes that “the
most characteristic symptom of COVID‐19 patients is respiratory
distress, and most of the patients admitted to the intensive care could
not breathe spontaneously.” Combined with the observation that “some
COVID‐19 patients also showed neurologic signs such as headache, nausea
and vomiting,” this paper asserts that since SARS was found heavily
concentrated in the brainstems of its autopsied victims, COVID-19 is
also probably crossing the blood-brain barrier and killing its victims
not just via pneumonia, but also by causing neurological respiratory
failure.
– And it should be noted that SARS – much ballyhooed as a close relative to the Wuhan Strain – didn’t notable effect white blood cell counts. Additionally, clinical treatment guides published online in late January by established Chinese medical sources
note the progressive reduction of white blood cells, as well as the
importance of monitoring this decline. And reporting from Thailand
indicates that adding a cocktail of two different anti-HIV drugs
to the typical flu treatment regime seemed to effectively knock back
the Wuhan Strain. Additionally, one of the only autopsies performed
outside of China to date found that the deceased had a severely depleted white blood cell count.
These lowered counts may come from this shared similarity with HIV, or
it could also be the result of antibody-dependent enhancement as well,
since this phenomenon primarily targets white blood cells for its hijackings and may help explain why consecutive infections are so lethal.
– In a highly concerning turn, scientists have noted that the Wuhan Strain can have a “striking” short term rate of mutation
which doesn’t indicate an artificial origin but captures the unique
threat posed by this coronavirus regardless of its providence, since a
faster mutation rates makes it more likely this virus can dodge testing
and neutralize vaccines. Something there is already early evidence for. Further concerning are reports out of China that even patients who appear cured still harbor COVID-19 in their system, and although the full implications of this are not yet known – none of them are good.
– One of the worst possible scenarios for COVID-19’s mutation rate would be if it falls into the Goldilocks range that would allow it to form mutant viral swarms:
too many mutations will cause a virus to eventually implode, not enough
allows host immune systems to catch-up, but if things are just right
mutant swarms can form and spread across host populations, burrowing
into host nervous systems and causing permanent neurological damage.
Mutant swarms form when a virus produces mutationally-damaged copies of
itself inside a host, some of which aren’t infectious but find their way
into the nervous system where they burrow in causing damage, and others
that combine with complimentary broken copies inside host cells to
produce working infectious copies of the virus. So a host can not only
become crippled with neurological issues, but also still be producing
infectious copies of the virus. And it seems as if COVID-19 has many
characteristics that indicate the potential to form mutant swarms: the
“striking” mutation rate mentioned above and the fact a second
widespread mutated strain seems to have already emerged in Washington
State with many other isolated strains reported elsewhere, crossing
between species is another factor and a dog in Hong Kong appears to have
tested positive, the fact that the Wuhan Strain can infect not only the
respiratory tract but feces as well – multi-organ involvement is an important contributor to viral swarms,
and finally the markedly viral load rate of COVID-19 compared to SARS –
SARS produced a viral load several times lower which decreased over
time, while COVID-19 produces a “very high” viral load that appears to increase over time and can peak several orders of magnitude higher than SARS was measured to reach. And alarming evidence that this phenomenon is occurring emerged from a Chinese pre-print which noted that over one-third of the roughly 200 patients studied has some neurological symptoms, with nearly half of the most severe patients exhibiting neurological issues.
– Another exceptional trait of the Wuhan Strain COVID-19 is that not
only does it form its own clade, it’s calculated to have diverged from
SARS and its other sister coronaviruses some 260 years ago. And yet in all that time, while it every other branch of the coronavirus tree was busy branching-off into countless variants,
if it emerged naturally, COVID-19 somehow spent a quarter of a
millennium as the lone known example of its clade, somehow not mutating
into related lineages in all that time. Another simpler explanation is
that this apparent hereditary distance and genetic uniqueness is the
just the result of being altered in a lab. And although two distinct
strains of COVID-19 have been identified, there’s no reason to believe
this mutational differentiation happened before contact with humans in
December of 2019. Additionally, when neutral sites, the specific points
in the genome which most reliably show evolutionary change, were
examined: COVID-19 looks even more evolutionarily distant from any of its possible relatives.
– Also giving credence to the idea that the Wuhan Strain was bio-engineered is
the existence of a patent application registered to a scientist from
Wuhan that looks to modulate a coronavirus’ spike-protein genes –
the precise region altered by Zhengli Shi at UNC to make a
hyper-virulent strain of coronavirus, and whose alteration and
adaptation would explain the Wuhan Strain’s unusual behavior as
discussed above.
0 comments:
Post a Comment