Sunday, July 31, 2011

why the old white dudes keep winning

Video - Bob Roberts trailer

Bucky-GandhiDesign | To replace the Old White Dudes we have to replace the vision of the world which they have been guardians of, in which a strong, mostly-white but not racistly so, liberal elite with nuclear weapons held down the world’s despotisms and communism. Cheney and the lads may well have slept well in their beds at night comparing themselves to Chairman Mao and his successors, and indeed when one looks at Putin and the mafiaization of Russian society, you might well want Cheney standing between you and that. Until we are ready to shoulder the burden of protecting Liberty globally, and with it Nature and the Poor, we are in no way, shape or form ready to overthrow the old guard and usher in a golden age.

Social policy is an easy problem compared to national security. But it is national security which has bankrupted America, perhaps through poorly chosen 21st century wars, but more likely through the decision not to half the Pentagon budget in the 1990s after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union. No amount of reinvestment can refloat an economy which spends half of its tax dollars on war, and spends more than the entire world combined on arms. Until we talk about a comprehensive demilitarization of American society, coalition-based global stabilization, and a true, deep reform of our attitudes and action relative to nuclear weapons, we are going to be broke, and stay broke, in all probability.

The Old White Dudes are the last bastions of the power structures built up in the age of the Cold War. Haque and Hine are a little too young to remember the cold fear which was so much a part of my generation’s consciousness – the experience, at the age of 8 or 9, of realizing that the adults are holding the entire future to ransom, and that Nobody Is Doing Anything About It. The men in power saw that system come into being, lived through it and under it, and remember it etched into their bones. They fathered children expecting them to die with the world in the final nuclear exchange, and they soldiered on anyway, towards a brighter future, red button in hand. You must respect the generation which maintained global stability through the latter part of the 20th century, monsters though they may appear to be in the peace which they have created.

Now they are old, and suffer the faults of old men. But I do not have big enough shoulders to replace them, and I do not blame them for hanging on to power, seeking for safe hands to cast off their burdens to. These Cold Warriors maintain the defense industry, which maintains the media (got a better link?) to a frightening degree, and thereby shapes much of what our culture regards as real. The people control the press by what they will buy and what they will watch, but none-the-less the editorial pencil is still in the hands of the military-industrial complex. They do not shape our taste, but they can still spike a story.

The reinvention must be a demilitarization, an end to the age of war, not simply gilding the lily of capitalism with a new tier of social values. A less evil capitalism will still be anchored in space and time by nuclear weapons policy, and shaped by the hands of those who must maintain a society in a certain shape to maintain nuclear weapons capability. The fatal mistake is to assign malign motives to the nuclear bureaucrats: they do what they do because they sincerely believe it to be the best thing they can do under the circumstances.

So I am content to work incrementally, trying to round off the worst parts of the hard end of human life over, perhaps, a 20 or 40 year project. I don’t know what to do next, and I don’t know how to unpick the Gordian knot of the world. And this is not to say that there is no room for young turks, but a little humility goes a long way. Haque does not cite sources for most of his thinking, and has little connection to what is old, solid and true. Blathery demagogues do sometimes get things done, but given the complexity of our situation, there is no time or space for easy answers. And Haque’s answers are easy answers: we can do more of the same but better, we don’t have to cut our environmental consumption by 75% to 90% within twenty or forty years, we don’t have to make space at the table for the poor or face their armed wrath. It’s not that radical to suggest making money while not being an asshole, Umair!

The truth is that it’s all coming down. A hard truth, but the real truth: between shifting global balances of economic power, the massive need to cut our over-consumption by at least 75%, and the enormous amounts of money we all owe the fundamental truth is it cannot go on like this. Haque’s failure of imagination, to conceive of a world which is on the other side of these massive shifts in economic, political and military power, and call it “the future” is dangerous enough on its own, but sold as The Great New Future, it joins Thomas Barnett‘s work as a dangerously misleading brand: to sell “more of the same” as radical innovation crowds out the space for radical innovation. Chiapas is radical innovation, not the next generation of leaders at Harvard Business School.

Lest you think this is simply a brutal takedown of Umair Haque, it is not. It is a call for renewed political awareness, not in the simple party-politics sense, not the dumb left-versus-right debates which have left us unable to govern ourselves without paralyzing clouds of rhetoric obscuring all sense, but a real sense of the hard problems of the world as the ones to which we should be addressing our power to create a better future for humanity. Let me frame five of those hard problems for you.

  1. Environment – US is at 8+ times footprint, Europe at 4+ times. We have no sane development path for 5 billion poor people trying to get a foot on the ladder.
  2. Poverty – one billion are regularly hungry, 9 million children a year die of preventable disease.
  3. Freedom – can free societies make tough decisions, or will authoritarian states like China endure hardship more effectively? What about creeping fascism and legalized torture in our democracies?
  4. Democracy – has failed, to a substantial degree, when combined with Imperial Power. Can the world be governed by democracies?
  5. Technological Risk – we have essentially no mechanism to regulate global risks from nuclear, biotechnology and nanotechnology. All three are spreading like a plague. Now what?
Working on these problems is radicalism. Working on how to keep Americans rich is not. We need to get real global perspective, and I’m singling out Umair Haque for a beat down because he’s telling people what they want to hear and dressing it up as radical truth.


nanakwame said...

The old white men put Obama into power. I could have imagine the first echo; he must of though them mad. Yet He had the megaego to deal and the smarts. Look who leads the "talks" in DC, and look who POTUS picks.  This will be an interesting 20 years for The States of the Americas

CNu said...

Obama is our scarlet letter A. Until Obama, blacks in America could easily and correctly (I believe) profess that we are in America, but not of America - at least morally. Hell, I didn't have full civil rights until the age of two and couldn't live wherever I could afford until the age of 6.

(Looking at the canary in the coal mine economic hits being sustained by black folk - one might well persist in this argument)  However, we turned out in droves to elect Obama in 08 and I suspect we'll do it again in 2012 - signifying our endorsement of Obamamandian governance - and full complicity in what he does and what it do. 

umbrarchist said...

{{{   This will be an interesting 20 years for The States of the Americas  }}}

Is that a Chinese curse?

The Laws of Physics do not give a damn about the American Dream.

What will happen if most White kids begin understanding how badly they have been screwed by the last 50 years of STUPIDITY.  What state would the country be in if Carter's Energy Crisis had been taken seriously.  Would we have all of these SUVs?  Why didn't our so called educators make accounting mandatory in school 50 years ago?

It is just a question of how long until the physics really crashes the global economy..  Physics does not care about the Chinese either.

The nylon story is funny.  I heard of that one before.

Anonymous said...

[url=]sexy dress[/url]
Booth started the British Vacuum Company and stylish his invention next several decades. Though his "Goblin" model befuddled out to competition from Hoover in your home vacuity grocery, his company successfully sour its focus towards the industrial grocery, construction ever-larger models for factories and warehouses. Booth's company lives on tod in general of pneumatic subway arrangement maker Quirepace Ltd..
Dresses that wrap or flow (meaning, they do not cinch) through the waistline are another good choice. While wearing slacks, go with straight or gently-flared hems. If you are slender, defining your waist with an artful belt might help, too..

[url=]chaussures nike pas cher[/url]
You should plan a physical exam together with your gynecologist once you have coverage. There may be some hormonal imbalance that can be corrected. Meanwhile, as you are apparently sexually active, you should use a reliable form of birth control.
You'll invariably feed an excessive amount of and the excess food will drop towards the bottom from the tank or breeder box. To wash a breeder box we love to to consider a 3 ft. length of aquarium tubing and a small bucket.
ashley said her wedding dress wouldn't be white

[url=]Oakley Sunglasses Outlet[/url]
[url=]Cheap Snapback Hats[/url]
[url=]snapback hats[/url]

I Didn't Think This Would Happen Until Tomorrow...,

Live Updates: Biden Drops Out of Presidential Race, Endorses Harris President Biden wrote on social media that he was ending his campaign f...