counterpunch | I wrote six articles (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
about the Bernie Sanders campaign during the 2016 primary. As everyone
keeps saying, Bernie is a paragon of consistency, so my understanding of
him stands unchanged. The political situation in 2020 is, however,
significantly different, and has opened up new possibilities for the
Sanders campaign. On the eve of the first primary vote in Iowa, let’s
consider what those possibilities are and where this campaign is taking
its constituents and the Democratic Party.
Bernie himself is the same as he ever was. A moderate welfare-state
Social Democrat, not a socialist or even anti-capitalist; anti-war with
an historically anti-imperialist, but now imperialist-accommodating,
tinge; nominally independent but functionally an auxiliary Democrat;
fiercely critical of Republicans but stubbornly shy about criticizing
Democratic colleagues. He is also, I think, honest and trustworthy. You
can see that he takes and fights for the positions he does because he
believes in them, not because he is opportunistically pandering to a
specific audience segment or to the donor class.
To be clear, even though, from my decidedly more leftist, socialist
point of view, I have no illusions about Bernie’s faults (and was pretty
ruthless about them in those 2016 essays), I hope he wins and will vote
for him. Indeed, I changed my registration in New York to vote for him
in the Democratic primary, and I would certainly vote for him in the
general. He would be the first Democratic presidential candidate I have
voted for in decades.
That’s because there is a difference in kind between Bernie and the
other Democratic candidates, a difference unlike the differences among
them. It’s the difference between a principled Social Democratic program
to meet human needs, based on and supported by a mass movement, and a
program of neoliberal tinkering to protect profit-making possibilities,
based on and supported by capitalist donors/the donor class.
His nomination would be a radical departure and would
radically disrupt the Democratic Party and the whole political game, and
he would have a great chance to win, opening new and substantively
different and left, social-democratic possibilities in the U.S.
Nowhere is this more evident than in his Medicare-for-All program,
and nothing has been more revelatory then watching fauxgressives like
Warren and Buttigieg moonwalk away from it. Bernie’s universal coverage
single-payer program establishes healthcare as a human right, not a
commodity. It concretely benefits the lives and enhances the social power of
the great majority of citizens by taking public control of an essential
service, and eliminating a predatory capitalist industry. That is why
all the other Democratic candidates (save perhaps Tulsi, who has been
unfairly but effectively rendered moot) reject it: they prefer
maintaining health care as a commodity sold to consumers for a profit,
just adding a generic version on the supermarket shelf; their “public
option” is all about preserving the “profit option.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment