paecon | When Trump was inaugurated on Friday, January 20, there was no
pro-jobs or anti-war demonstration. That presumably would have attracted
pro-Trump supporters in an ecumenical show of force. Instead, the
Women’s March on Saturday led even the pro-Democrat New York Times
to write a front-page article reporting that white women were
complaining that they did not feel welcome in the demonstration. The
message to anti-war advocates, students and Bernie supporters was that
their economic cause was a distraction.
The march was typically Democratic in that its ideology did not threaten the Donor Class. As Yves Smith wrote on Naked Capitalism:
“the track record of non-issue-oriented marches, no matter how large
scale, is poor, and the status of this march as officially sanctioned
(blanket media coverage when other marches of hundreds of thousands of
people have been minimized, police not tricked out in their usual riot
gear) also indicates that the officialdom does not see it as a threat to
the status quo."
Hillary’s
loss was not blamed on her neoliberal support for TPP or her pro-war
neocon stance, but on the revelations of the e-mails by her operative
Podesta discussing his dirty tricks against Bernie Sanders (claimed to
be given to Wikileaks by Russian hackers, not a domestic DNC leaker as
Wikileaks claimed) and the FBI investigation of her e-mail abuses at the
State Department. Backing her supporters’ attempt to brazen it out, the
Democratic Party has doubled down on its identity politics, despite the
fact that an estimated 52 percent of white women voted for Trump. After
all, women do work for wages. And that also is what Blacks and
Hispanics want – in addition to banking that serves their needs, not those of Wall Street, and health care that serves their needs, not those of the health-insurance and pharmaceuticals monopolies.
0 comments:
Post a Comment