NYTimes | As Detroit files for bankruptcy — the largest American city ever to do so — the impressive collection of the Detroit Institute of Arts
has become a political bargaining chip in a fight that could drag on
for years between the city and its army of creditors, who have said in
no uncertain terms that the artworks must be considered a salable asset.
“We haven’t proposed selling any asset,” said Bill Nowling, a spokesman
for Kevyn D. Orr, the state-appointed emergency manager appointed to
deal with Detroit’s debts, which could amount to more than $18 billion.
“But we haven’t taken any asset off the table. We can’t. We cannot
negotiate in good faith with our creditors by taking assets off the
table. And all of our creditors have asked about the worth of the D.I.A.
And we’ve told them that they’re welcome to find out.”
Unlike most art museums around the country, which are owned by nonprofit
corporations that hold a collection in trust for citizens, the
institute is owned by Detroit, as is much of its collection — which is
not particularly deep but includes gems by artists like Bruegel, Caravaggio, Rembrandt and van Gogh. It is considered among the top 10 encyclopedic museums in the country.
Museums do not generally appraise the market value of their works beyond
a blanket amount for insurance policies. But experts have speculated
that the institute’s works could bring more than $2 billion if sold.
About a month ago, the institute’s officials were contacted by
Christie’s auction house, which asked for an inventory of works and
asked if appraisers could visit to assess the collection. It is unclear
whether such a visit took place and whether it was creditors or someone
else who enlisted Christie’s to begin an appraisal. (Mr. Nowling said
that the emergency manager’s office did not do so, and Christie’s
declined to comment.)
But as Detroit’s financial fate comes before a federal bankruptcy judge,
it is clear that the desire of creditors to determine the collection’s
worth will not go away.
The museum, which has hired a well-known bankruptcy lawyer, Richard
Levin, to advise it on its possible exposure, declined to comment on
Friday. But on its Facebook page,
the museum said: “As a municipal bankruptcy of this size is
unprecedented, the D.I.A. will continue to carefully monitor the
situation, fully confident that the emergency manager, the governor and
the courts will act in the best interest of the City, the public and the
museum.”
Few large American art museums have found themselves in the financial
cross hairs quite as often as the Detroit Institute of Arts. Not long
after it was founded in 1885, it became enmeshed in a lawsuit that led
to a loss of city appropriations, putting it in budgetary straits. In
1955, during a city financial crisis, the museum’s acquisitions mostly
ceased. And in 1973, during another economic downturn, it had to close
temporarily.
0 comments:
Post a Comment