guardian | The film Dirty Wars, which premiered at Sundance, can be viewed, as Amy Goodman sees it,
as an important narrative of excesses in the global "war on terror". It
is also a record of something scary for those of us at home – and
uncovers the biggest story, I would say, in our nation's contemporary
history.
Though they wisely refrain from drawing inferences,
Scahill and Rowley have uncovered the facts of a new unaccountable power
in America and the world that has the potential to shape domestic and
international events in an unprecedented way. The film tracks the Joint
Special Operations Command (JSoc), a network of highly-trained, completely unaccountable US assassins, armed with ever-expanding "kill lists". It was JSoc that ran the operation behind the Navy Seal team six that killed bin Laden.
Scahill
and Rowley track this new model of US warfare that strikes at civilians
and insurgents alike – in 70 countries. They interview former JSoc
assassins, who are shell-shocked at how the "kill lists" they are given
keep expanding, even as they eliminate more and more people.
Our
conventional forces are subject to international laws of war: they are
accountable for crimes in courts martial; and they run according to a
clear chain of command. As much as the US military
may fall short of these standards at times, it is a model of lawfulness
compared with JSoc, which has far greater scope to undertake the
commission of extra-legal operations – and unimaginable crimes.
JSoc morphs the secretive, unaccountable mercenary model of private military contracting, which Scahill identified in Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army, into a hybrid with the firepower and intelligence backup of our full state resources. The Hill reports that JSoc is now seeking more "flexibility" to expand its operations globally.
JSoc operates outside the traditional chain of command; it reports directly to the president of the United States. In the words of Wired magazine:
"JSoc operates with practically no accountability."
Scahill calls JSoc the president's "paramilitary". Its budget, which may be in the billions, is secret.
What
does it means for the president to have an unaccountable paramilitary
force, which can assassinate anyone anywhere in the world?
1 comments:
If Barack "Stephen" Obama had an ounce of decency, rather than desecrating the Bible of the Honorable Martin L King, he would have taken his oath of office on the Bible of Andrew Jackson, George W. Bush or another president more compatible with his warmongering demeanor. The real issues here are the dangerous unconstitutional precedents being established by Barack Obama.
Given the fickle whims of the American body politic it’s not at all beyond the real of possibility that the same logic used to justify the killing of 16-year old Abdulrahman al-Awlaki (he had a bad father) could be used by a future president against our sons and grandsons.
Post a Comment