lfb | Drones are wildly popular on the battlefield. Now they can claim
victory elsewhere. The use of drones within U.S. borders — in car
chases, to monitor wildfires, or for simple surveillance — is uniting
political parties and people more often at odds.
Their concern: The widespread use of drones among civilians represents a deep and dangerous intrusion into American life.
“What we used to know as privacy is finished,” said John Whitehead, a
constitutional scholar and president of Virginia-based Rutherford
Institute. “Big Brother is here to stay.”
Both the progressive American Civil Liberties Union and the
libertarian Rutherford Institute cheer legislative efforts to place
strict limits on unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs. And prodded by
privacy groups, state lawmakers nationwide – Republicans and Democrats
alike – have launched an all-out offensive against the unmanned aerial
vehicles.
In at least 13 states, lawmakers this year will examine bills to
place strict limits on how government entities can deploy drones. No
state has embedded such regulations into law.
Drones are already everywhere – executing search-and-rescue missions,
tracking cattle rustlers, or monitoring wildfires with minimal cost and
little risk of loss of life.
The Federal Aviation Administration listed 345 active drone licenses
as of November 2012. Congress has directed the federal department to
streamline the approval process. Starting in 2015, commercial entities
– think entertainment news outlet TMZ – will have easy access to drone
permits.
Analysts believe as many as 30,000 drones will populate American skies by 2020.
Canyon County, Idaho, already has one, a camera-equipped Draganflyer X-6 it bought for $33,400 with federal grant money. About a year ago, Mesa County, Colorado, used $14,000 to purchase its drone, a 4-foot-long, 9-pound plane that can maintain flight for about an hour. The Seattle Police Department spent $41,000 in August for its Draganflyer X-6.
With the booming interest in the myriad uses of UAVs comes nervous anxiety about the creep of the surveillance state.
And that’s where state lawmakers and their allies come in.
