counterpunch | In the circus known as the American presidential campaign, Donald
Trump is being presented as a lunatic, a fascist. He is certainly
odious; but he is also a media hate figure. That alone should arouse
our scepticism.
Trump’s views on migration are grotesque, but no more grotesque than
those of David Cameron. It is not Trump who is the Great Deporter from
the United States, but the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Barack Obama.
According to one prodigious liberal commentator, Trump is “unleashing the dark forces of violence” in the United States. Unleashing them?
This is the country where toddlers shoot their mothers and the police
wage a murderous war against black Americans. This is the country that
has attacked and sought to overthrow more than 50 governments, many of
them democracies, and bombed from Asia to the Middle East, causing the
deaths and dispossession of millions of people.
No country can equal this systemic record of violence. Most of
America’s wars (almost all of them against defenceless countries) have
been launched not by Republican presidents but by liberal Democrats:
Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama.
In 1947, a series of National Security Council directives described
the paramount aim of American foreign policy as “a world substantially
made over in [America’s] own image”. The ideology was messianic
Americanism. We were all Americans. Or else. Heretics would be
converted, subverted, bribed, smeared or crushed.
Donald Trump is a symptom of this, but he is also a maverick. He says
the invasion of Iraq was a crime; he doesn’t want to go to war with
Russia and China. The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary
Clinton. She is no maverick. She embodies the resilience and violence
of a system whose vaunted “exceptionalism” is totalitarian with an occasional liberal face.
As presidential election day draws near, Clinton will be hailed as
the first female president, regardless of her crimes and lies – just as
Barack Obama was lauded as the first black president and liberals
swallowed his nonsense about “hope”. And the drool goes on.
Described by the Guardian columnist Owen Jones as “funny,
charming, with a coolness that eludes practically every other
politician”, Obama the other day sent drones to slaughter 150 people in
Somalia. He kills people usually on Tuesdays, according to the New York Times, when he is handed a list of candidates for death by drone. So cool.
In the 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton threatened to
“totally obliterate” Iran with nuclear weapons. As Secretary of State
under Obama, she participated in the overthrow of the democratic
government of Honduras. Her contribution to the destruction of Libya in
2011 was almost gleeful. When the Libyan leader, Colonel Gaddafi, was
publicly sodomised with a knife – a murder made possible by American
logistics – Clinton gloated over his death: “We came, we saw, he died.”
One of Clinton’s closest allies is Madeleine Albright, the former
secretary of State, who has attacked young women for not supporting
“Hillary”. This is the same Madeleine Albright who infamously
celebrated on TV the death of half a million Iraqi children as “worth
it”.
Among Clinton’s biggest backers are the Israel lobby and the arms
companies that fuel the violence in the Middle East. She and her
husband have received a fortune from Wall Street. And yet, she is about
to be ordained the women’s candidate, to see off the evil Trump, the
official demon. Her supporters include distinguished feminists: the
likes of Gloria Steinem in the US and Anne Summers in Australia.
A generation ago, a post-modern cult now known as “identity politics”
stopped many intelligent, liberal-minded people examining the causes
and individuals they supported — such as the fakery of Obama and
Clinton; such as bogus progressive movements like Syriza in Greece,
which betrayed the people of that country and allied with their enemies.
Self absorption, a kind of “me-ism”, became the new zeitgeist in
privileged western societies and signaled the demise of great collective
movements against war, social injustice, inequality, racism and
sexism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment