theatlantic | “Everyone philosophizes,” writes neuroscientist Dr. Andrew Newberg in his latest book, The Metaphysical Mind: Probing the Biology of Philosophical Thought.
We all speculate about the meaning of all kinds of things, from
everyday concerns about dealing with a co-worker to our ultimate beliefs
about the purpose of existence. Accompanying solutions we find to these
problems, there’s a range of satisfied feelings, from “ah-ha” or
light-bulb moments upon solving an everyday problem to ecstatic feelings
during mystical experiences.
Since everyday and spiritual concerns are variations of the same
thinking processes, Newberg thinks it’s essential to examine how people
experience spirituality in order to fully understand how their brains
work. Looking at the bigger questions has already provided practical
applications for improving mental and physical health.
Newberg is a pioneer in the field of neurotheology,
the neurological study of religious and spiritual experiences. In the
1990s, he began his work in the field by scanning what happens in
people’s brains when they meditate, because it is a spiritual practice
that is relatively easy to monitor.
Since then, he’s looked at around 150
brain scans, including those of Buddhists, nuns, atheists, Pentecostals
speaking in tongues, and Brazilian mediums practicing psychography—the
channeling of messages from the dead through handwriting.
As to what’s going on in their brains, Newberg says, “It depends to
some degree on what the practice is.” Practices that involve
concentrating on something over and over again, either through prayer or
a mantra-based meditation, tend to activate the frontal lobes, the
areas chiefly responsible for directing attention, modulating behavior,
and expressing language.
When practitioners surrender
their will, activity decreases in their frontal lobes, suggesting that
speech is being generated from some place other than the normal speech
centers.
In contrast, when practitioners surrender their will, such as when they
speak in tongues or function as a medium, activity decreases in their
frontal lobes and increases in their thalamus, the tiny brain structure
that regulates the flow of incoming sensory information to many parts of
the brain. This suggests that their speech is being generated from some
place other than the normal speech centers.
Believers could say this proves that another entity is speaking through
the practitioner, while nonbelievers would look for a neurological
explanation. Newberg takes into account both perspectives. When he
defines neurotheology in his book, Principles of Neurotheology,
he writes, “An ardent atheist, who refuses to accept any aspect of
religion as possibly correct or useful, or a devout religious person,
who refuses to accept science as providing any value regarding knowledge
of the world, would most likely not be considered a neurotheologian.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment