theatlantic | The app is just one way ISIS games Twitter to magnify its message.
Another is the use of organized hashtag campaigns, in which the group
enlists hundreds and sometimes thousands of activists to repetitively
tweet hashtags at certain times of day so that they trend on the social
network. This approach also skews the results of a popular Arabic
Twitter account called @ActiveHashtags
that tweets each day’s top trending tags. When ISIS gets its hashtag
into the @ActiveHashtags stream, it results in an average of 72 retweets
per tweet, which only makes the hashtag trend more. As it gains
traction, more users are exposed to ISIS’s messaging. The group’s
supporters also run accounts similar to @ActiveHashtags that exclusively
feature jihadi content and can produce hundreds of retweets per tweet.
As a result of these strategies, and others, ISIS is able to project
strength and promote engagement online. For instance, the ISIS hashtag
consistently outperforms that of the group’s main competitor in Syria,
Jabhat al-Nusra, even though the two groups have a similar number of
supporters online. In data I analyzed in February, ISIS often registered
more than 10,000 mentions of its hashtag per day, while the number of
al-Nusra mentions generally ranged between 2,500 and 5,000.
ISIS also uses hashtags to focus-group messaging and branding
concepts, much like a Western corporation might. Earlier this year, ISIS
hinted, without being specific, that it was planning to change the name
of its organization. Activists then carefully promoted a hashtag
crafted to look like a grassroots initiative, demanding that ISIS leader
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi declare not an Islamic state in Syria and Iraq,
but the rebirth of an Islamic caliphate. The question of when and how to
declare a new caliphate is highly controversial in jihadi circles, and
the hashtag produced a great deal of angry and divisive discussion,
which ISIS very likely tracked and measured. It never announced a name
change.
Media attention has focused, not unreasonably, on ISIS’s use of
social media to spread pictures of graphic violence, attract new
fighters, and incite lone wolves. But it’s important to recognize that
these activities are supported by sophisticated online machinery. ISIS
does have legitimate support online—but less than it might seem. And it
owes a lot of that support to a calculated campaign that would put
American social-media-marketing gurus to shame.
0 comments:
Post a Comment