bnarchives | This dissertation offers the first comprehensive
historical examination of the political economy of US public debt
ownership. Specifically, the study addresses the following questions:
Who owns the US public debt? Is the distribution of federal government
bonds concentrated in the hands of a specific group or is it widely
held? And what if the identities of those who receive interest payments
on government bonds are distinct from those who pay the taxes that
finance the interest payments on the public debt? Does this mean that
the public debt redistributes income from taxpayers to public creditors?
Who ultimately bears the burden of financing the public debt?
Despite
centuries of debate, political economists have failed to come to any
consensus on even the most basic facts concerning ownership of the US
public debt and its potential redistributive effects. Some claim that
the public debt is heavily concentrated and that interest payments on
government bonds redistribute income regressively from poor to rich.
Others insist that the public debt has become very widely held and
instead redistributes income progressively. The lack of consensus, I
argue, boils down to both the empirical and theoretical problems that
plague existing studies.
Empirically, only a
handful of studies have attempted to map the ownership pattern of US
federal government bonds, and even fewer have made efforts to measure
the redistributive effects associated with a given ownership pattern.
And to make matters worse, those few studies that do attempt to map the
pattern of US public debt ownership make little effort to theorize in
any systematic way the distributive and redistributive dimensions of the
public debt.
Anchored within a ‘capital as
power’ theoretical framework, my purpose in this is to shed some
much-needed light on the dynamics of distribution and redistribution
that lie at the heart of the public debt. I show for the household and
corporate sectors how over the past three decades, and especially in the
context of the current crisis, the ownership of federal bonds and
federal interest has become rapidly concentrated in the hands of
dominant owners, the top 1% of households and the 2,500 largest
corporations. Over the same period the federal income tax system has
done little to progressively redistribute the federal interest income
received by dominant owners. In this way, this dissertation argues that,
since the early 1980s, the public debt has come to reinforce and
augment the power of those at the very top of the hierarchy of social
power.
0 comments:
Post a Comment