guardian | Massacres of civilians are being exploited for narrow geopolitical competition to control Mideast oil, gas pipelines. Few recall that US agitation against Syria began long before recent atrocities, in the context of wider operations targeting Iranian influence across the Middle East.
In May 2007, a presidential finding
revealed that Bush had authorised CIA operations against Iran.
Anti-Syria operations were also in full swing around this time as part
of this covert programme, according to Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker.
A range of US government and intelligence sources told him that the
Bush administration had "cooperated with Saudi Arabia's government,
which is Sunni, in clandestine operations" intended to weaken the
Shi'ite Hezbollah in Lebanon. "The US has also taken part in clandestine
operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria," wrote Hersh, "a
byproduct" of which is "the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups"
hostile to the United States and "sympathetic to al-Qaeda." He noted
that "the Saudi government, with Washington's approval, would provide
funds and logistical aid to weaken the government of President Bashir
Assad, of Syria," with a view to pressure him to be "more conciliatory
and open to negotiations" with Israel. One faction receiving covert US
"political and financial support" through the Saudis was the exiled
Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.
According to former French foreign minister Roland Dumas,
Britain had planned covert action in Syria as early as 2009: "I was in
England two years before the violence in Syria on other business", he
told French television:
"I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria. This was in Britain not in America. Britain was preparing gunmen to invade Syria."
The 2011 uprisings, it would seem - triggered by a confluence of domestic energy shortages and climate-induced droughts which led to massive food price hikes - came at an opportune moment that was quickly exploited. Leaked emails from the private intelligence firm Stratfor including notes from a meeting with Pentagon officials confirmed US-UK training of Syrian opposition forces since 2011 aimed at eliciting "collapse" of Assad's regime "from within."
So what was this unfolding strategy to undermine Syria and Iran all about? According to retired NATO Secretary General Wesley Clark,
a memo from the Office of the US Secretary of Defense just a few weeks
after 9/11 revealed plans to "attack and destroy the governments in 7
countries in five years", starting with Iraq and moving on to "Syria,
Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran." In a subsequent interview,
Clark argues that this strategy is fundamentally about control of the region's vast oil and gas resources.
Much of the strategy currently at play was candidly described in a 2008 US Army-funded RAND report, Unfolding the Future of the Long War (pdf). The report noted that "the economies of the industrialized states will continue to rely heavily on oil,
thus making it a strategically important resource." As most oil will be
produced in the Middle East, the US has "motive for maintaining
stability in and good relations with Middle Eastern states":
1 comments:
Did President Obama paint himself into a corner when he said in August 2012: “We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation. . . . We’re monitoring that situation very carefully. We have put together a range of contingency plans.” Or was this a message to the Syrian rebels telling them what conditions are required to trigger a US military attack against the Assad regime?
[There is a growing volume of new evidence from numerous sources in the Middle East — mostly affiliated with the Syrian opposition and its sponsors and supporters — which makes a very strong case, based on solid circumstantial evidence, that the August 21, 2013, chemical strike in the Damascus suburbs was indeed a pre-meditated provocation by the Syrian opposition. The extent of US foreknowledge of this provocation needs further investigation because available data puts the “horror” of the Barack Obama White House in a different and disturbing light.]
http://www.globalresearch.ca/did-the-white-house-help-plan-the-syrian-chemical-attack/5347542
Side note: While the Congressional Democrats (other than Barbara Lee and a few others) line up with the neo-liberal interventionists, will the Congressional Republicans defy the neocons and refuse to give Obama the authority (which he says he does not really need) to bomb Syria? Antiwar Republicans--that oxymoronic!
Post a Comment