NYTimes | Loosely inspired by an actual friendship between the
two men, the play explores how each dealt with the pressure of being a
black public figure trying to shape his identity in the face of outside
forces. Fetchit became Hollywood’s first black star, but only by
embodying a demeaning stereotype of black men as lazy and shiftless.
Despite Ali’s new fame as a boxing champ, his alliance with the Nation
of Islam made him controversial. Mr. Power’s play suggests that while
Fetchit became indelibly associated with racial prejudice, and Ali with
black pride, their divergent stories may have had more to do with the
eras in which they were born than the characters of the men themselves.
The play takes place primarily in Lewiston, Me., in
1965, where Ali is preparing for a rematch with Sonny Liston, whom he
had beaten the year before to take the heavyweight title. The atmosphere
is fraught, since the recent assassination of Malcolm X has put a
spotlight on Ali’s relations with the Nation of Islam. (That group,
which Malcolm X had left, was rumored to be behind the killing.) The
remote Lewiston was selected for the fight because no more prominent
city would host it after rumors began that allies of Malcolm X would be
gunning — literally — for Ali.
In this tense atmosphere, Ali (Ray Fisher) turns to
Fetchit (K. Todd Freeman) for informal advice. He knows that Fetchit was
an intimate friend of the great black fighter Jack Johnson, and despite
his preening egoism, Ali wouldn’t mind having an ace in the hole:
knowledge of a legendary maneuver called the “anchor punch” that he believes might have been entrusted to Fetchit.
Fetchit claims to know nothing of this secret weapon
but is eager to rehabilitate his image by linking himself with a figure
who embodies self-determination. (In the scene of their first meeting,
Ali teasingly calls him “a traitor to their race.”) Having established
the reason for their alliance, however, Mr. Power cannot make it a
convincing focus of the narrative, so the play bobs and weaves among a
host of subplots.
Flashbacks to Hollywood in the 1920s depict Fetchit — his real name was Lincoln Perry
— shrewdly negotiating his contract with the paternalistic studio chief
William Fox (a feisty Richard Masur). A star of the vaudeville circuit
with a huge following, Fetchit knows his value, and manages to secure
highly favorable terms — albeit only by inventing a fictional white
lawyer to blame for his demands.
11 comments:
This isn't just about reflexes, it's a picture perfect example of the NPR article's takeaway on anticipatory conditioning, training, pre-cognition. What you seem to like to call the fourth (force). Ali was amazingly fast, but that's only a fraction of what we're observing in these slow motion reveals.
Bro Feed,
There was a tiresome op-ed in the NYTimes by the afrodemic philosopher George Yancy. Several bright commentors called out the ponderousness of the academic lit-crit language used by Yancy to make his whiney, punk-assed complaints, f'zample http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/walking-while-black-in-the-white-gaze/?comments#permid=271
You know, I've given you the benefit of the doubt for having something to say, but, I'm about at the end of my rope with regard to all of your idiosyncratic coinages you've invested so heavily in that they now thoroughly obfuscate your meaning. http://youtu.be/6zvGRmX2gcs
Make it plain brah, make it plain.....,
The much-maligned James David Manning offers a master-class in keeping it straight-up, simple, and plain http://youtu.be/jp3jzW65luU
Sorry for not being exactly on point, but did you note this narrative also being challenged?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/12/stephen-jimenez-matthew-shepard_n_3914707.html
Nah, I have less than zero interest in the goings-on among sordid infrasexual brokebacks..., and still less in exonerating their enemies - otoh, I have found this bit of pop cultural foment interesting http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/what-dj-mister-cees-scandal-means-for-hip-hop/5230e99778c90a121000039d
http://janetmock.com/2013/09/12/men-who-date-attracted-to-trans-women-stigma/
In light of your previous link to preacher Manning, first of all it's really tough to confirm this--this article was talking about Lebrun's getting caught and friends in the industry backing him up...
http://sandrarose.com/2011/06/mister-cee-pleads-guilty-to-what-we-already-knew-about-him/
"Other deejays, who have had their manhoods questioned in the past — such as Funkmaster Flex — joined rap artists in support of the married father of four." Is it true Calvin Lebrun is married with four children, and if so, how can you have a half hour conversation an not even talk about how another man in the community demonstrates how little he values the people who value him so much in exchange for something he is so ashamed of? Again if true, that he is married with 4 children, the conversation shows just how far removed these people are from values that uphold and society.
This comment suggests you didn't watch the conversation at HuffPo that I linked between Marc Lamont Hill, Janet Mock and Laverne Cox...,
To be fair, who could possibly read anything at HuffPo?
@Tom -- To quote Don Corleone, "Keep your friends close, but your enemies even closer..."
It is important to know what the other side is thinking, even when you don't believe it....
lol, now that the boys have unburdened themselves Tom, you may wanna go wash off what you've inadvertently stepped into...,
I am not following why your scripture you chose fits here. The
woman in the text has understood her sin, and is placing Jesus and is falling under Christ mercy. It would be assumed this would be the type of forgiveness and call for repentance that
took place with the woman caught in the act of adultery in John 8, where Jesus
says: "“Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?” She said, “No one, Lord.”And Jesus said to her, “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.”
Do you see the transgender persons on the
video you have chosen bowing at Jesus feet seeking his forgiveness and
repenting, your scripture doesn't fit this circumstance. I would think the
Romans 1 scripture is more relevant:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=romans%201:18-32&version=NKJV
My post was marveling at how far this is
developing. The tension of the Christian is how to show love for the person, while
at the same time making sure we don't fall into verse 32: "who, knowing the righteous
judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death,
not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them."
Christ did show us a good example with the woman
caught in adultery. Understand we too have sinned and have been forgiven, like
your text says; this of course is where most want to leave it, in your text and
the text in John there is acknowledgment of sin and the commandment to live without
committing it anymore.
Clearly, the video you linked to has no
consideration of any sin or repentance or what's right in God's eyes. In fact
the people you linked to are disappointed the activities of this man aren't
more common, and more roundly approved by the masses. There is only encouragement
to pursue these activities with even more vigor.
Post a Comment