tariqramadan | It’s dangerous to be a friend of the United States in the Middle
East. A fact the US government knows better than any political player in
the Arab world, starting with America’s best friends! The strategy is
simple: cover your tracks, forget history, don’t let cold hard facts get
in the way. For the last sixty years, the United States has supported
the Egyptian army and the successive dictatorial regimes (Nasser,
despite tense relations, then Sadat and Mubarak) that protected their
geostrategic interests, promoted “regional security” and, of course,
defended Israel. Nothing has changed: the American administration was
squarely behind the June 30 military coup, which was planned well in
advance by the army high command and its civilian allies, including
Mohammed el-Baradei. As early as 2008-2009 el-Baradei, one of the US’s
key Egyptian strategic assets, had been advancing by stealth. In my Islam and the Arab Awakening
I published comments by American officials about him and his
involvement in the April 6 Movement (1). On the day of the coup, the US
refused to describe it as such in order not to interrupt support for
its military allies and the new political power structure. Secretary of
State John Kerry could only confirm what serious analysts already knew
when he stated a few days later that on June 30 the army had “restored
the democratic process.” There can be no doubt that the US government
fully supports the Egyptian armed forces. Its regional allies quickly
swung into action: billions of dollars poured in from Saudi Arabia, the
UAE and Kuwait.
Covering tracks is the strategy of choice. Domestically, the
propaganda machine is in high gear: the United States had been meddling
in Egyptian affairs by supporting the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). The new
political authorities (the interim president, prime minister and, of
course, el-Baradei) are playing their parts to perfection: they claim to
be “disappointed” by the lack of American backing. In the Washington Post
and not in an Egyptian newspaper, General al-Sisi
even—astonishingly—accused the US government of abandoning him: “You
turned your back on the Egyptians, and they won’t forget that.”
(2)Washington Post, August 3, 2013 It was a clever gambit, one that
managed to fool a section of the Egyptian population. That would make
the armed forces and the civilian transitional government out to be
courageous and independent patriots, while American agents and foreign
powers had all along propped up the MB. The Americans know well the
power of such propaganda, and the symbolic gestures needed to make it
convincing. But it was a lie from start to finish.
The facts and figures produced are a bigger lie: 30 million Egyptians
took to the streets, they tell us, and 16 million signed an
anti-government petition. Where do these figure, intoned like a mantra
in the media, come from? By comparing images from the pilgrimage to
Mecca with those produced on June 30 (by the Egyptian military, which
transmitted them to press agencies around the world: Google claims not
to have broadcast them), experts estimate the total turnout at no more
than four or five million. In fact, the figure of 30 million is
preposterous, as are the 16 million signatures, especially for anyone
familiar with social conditions on the ground in Egypt. New propaganda;
new lies.
0 comments:
Post a Comment