My concept of a future generation pilot is to see pilots like the guy talking in the video out of a job.
There is zero need for a "pilot" with these advanced planes and one person cannot pick up all the data and avionics and due to physic programming, the plane can perform maneuvers that will withstand more Gs than the human body, making it more formidable.
I think the drone thing with Obama and Hillary Clinton watching it all unfold from the West Wing is kinda cool....
bears repeating; My concept of a future generation pilot is to see pilots like the guy talking in the video out of a job. - the plane can perform maneuvers that will withstand more Gs than the human body, making it more formidable.
A human body can take a 100 gees, but only for a very brief moment, what they call "shock" or "jerk" the 3rd derivative stuff. A computer chip can take 100 gees pretty much forever. The ironic thing is, once a robot is running the show, the airframe is the weakest link. And, I know we want to keep the human in the kill loop, but I'd wager within 5 years we see an autonomous robot kill somebody. Humans are just too slow.
So, you get your 5th generation human-piloted fighter and go up against my kamikaze robot swarm. Who wins? (5th generation fighter, 100s of millions of dollars, human piloted, at least a million dollars to train, and my swarm robot mini-fighter, armed with a cannon and a self-destruct 70kg high explosive device, at around, what? 150 - 300,000 smackers? x 100? Shazam!)
John, they already got us working on that project:
http://www.uavforge.net/
Would be nice to see a scout/attack duo configuration where one quad-rotor can relay the exact coordinates to the attack quad-rotor that will fire. Pure AI to AI with no human interaction except to confirm before neutralization...
This surprises me not at all. And I've a standing bet that within the next five years, some head of state or similar high mucky-muck will get a face full of a quarter stick of dynamite with one of these little drones, and the cost will be less than a hundred bucks. The latest form of IED. (Or maybe it's already been used... was that really a car bomb in Iran...?)
A New Paradigm for Black History?
-
In May 2016, historians gathered in Washington, D.C., for “The Future of
the African American Past” conference to share research and discuss new
directions...
Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy
-
Grégoire Delétang, Anian Ruoss, Jordi Grau-Moya, Tim Genewein, Li Kevin
Wenliang, Elliot Catt, Chris Cundy, Marcus Hutter, Shane Legg, Joel Veness,
Pedro...
Digital Art and Animation Class: Final Project
-
I have been enrolled in Digital Art and Animation Class this semester and
just finished up. Honestly don't care what my grade is as I'm 66, this was
an ...
Previous year on 51
-
I made a post June 22nd, 2019 titled Synchronicity where I posted the below.
"From 1945 to 1982...Yield rates kept rising higher and higher from out of
t...
The Brooklyn Rail Interview
-
The following is an interview that Jarrod Shanahan recently conducted with
me for the April 2023 edition of The Brooklyn Rail newspaper. “Under the
Mask of...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...
8 comments:
Nice.
My concept of a future generation pilot is to see pilots like the guy talking in the video out of a job.
There is zero need for a "pilot" with these advanced planes and one person cannot pick up all the data and avionics and due to physic programming, the plane can perform maneuvers that will withstand more Gs than the human body, making it more formidable.
I think the drone thing with Obama and Hillary Clinton watching it all unfold from the West Wing is kinda cool....
bears repeating; My concept of a future generation pilot is to see pilots like the guy talking in the video out of a job. - the plane can perform maneuvers that will withstand more Gs than the human body, making it more formidable.
Happy New Year Brother!!! What a pleasant and unexpected surprise to have you drop by.
A human body can take a 100 gees, but only for a very brief moment, what they call "shock" or "jerk" the 3rd derivative stuff. A computer chip can take 100 gees pretty much forever. The ironic thing is, once a robot is running the show, the airframe is the weakest link. And, I know we want to keep the human in the kill loop, but I'd wager within 5 years we see an autonomous robot kill somebody. Humans are just too slow.
So, you get your 5th generation human-piloted fighter and go up against my kamikaze robot swarm. Who wins? (5th generation fighter, 100s of millions of dollars, human piloted, at least a million dollars to train, and my swarm robot mini-fighter, armed with a cannon and a self-destruct 70kg high explosive device, at around, what? 150 - 300,000 smackers? x 100? Shazam!)
Might want to watch the Frontline Digital Frontiers episode from a year ago, "Remoted-Controlled War".
here's an excerpt: http://video.pbs.org/video/2175892463/
John, they already got us working on that project:
http://www.uavforge.net/
Would be nice to see a scout/attack duo configuration where one quad-rotor can relay the exact coordinates to the attack quad-rotor that will fire. Pure AI to AI with no human interaction except to confirm before neutralization...
This surprises me not at all. And I've a standing bet that within the next five years, some head of state or similar high mucky-muck will get a face full of a quarter stick of dynamite with one of these little drones, and the cost will be less than a hundred bucks. The latest form of IED. (Or maybe it's already been used... was that really a car bomb in Iran...?)
Post a Comment