Wednesday, September 07, 2011

the radical implications of a zero growth economy


Video - Maurice Strong Interview (BBC, 1972)

RWER | For 50 years literature has been accumulating pointing out the contradiction between the pursuit of economic growth and ecological sustainability, although this has had negligible impact on economic theory or practice. A few, notably Herman Daly (2008), have continued to attempt to get the notion of a steady-state economy onto the agenda but it has only been in the last few years that discussion has begun to gain momentum. Jackson’s Prosperity Without Growth(200) has been widely recognised, there is now a substantial European ”De-growth” movement (Latouche, 2007), and CASSE (2010) has emerged.

The argument in this paper is that the implications of a steady-state economy have not been understood at all well, especially by its advocates. Most proceed as if we can and should eliminate the growth element of the present economy while leaving the rest more or less as it is. It will be argued firstly that this is not possible, because this is not an economy which has growth; it is a growth-economy, a system in which most of the core structures and processes involve growth. If growth is eliminated then radically different ways of carrying out many fundamental processes will have to be found. Secondly, the critics of growth typically proceed as if it is the only or the primary or the sufficient thing that has to be fixed, but it will be argued that the major global problems facing us cannot be solved unless several fundamental systems and structures within consumer-capitalist society are radically remade. What is required is much greater social change than Western society has undergone in several hundred years.

Before offering support for these claims it is important to sketch the general “limits to growth” situation confronting us. The magnitude and seriousness of the global resource and environmental problem is not generally appreciated. Only when this is grasped is it possible to understand that the social changes required must be huge, radical and far reaching. The initial claim being argued here (and detailed in Trainer 2010b) is that consumer-capitalist society cannot be reformed or fixed; it has to be largely scrapped and remade along quite different lines.

The “limits to growth” case: An outline

The planet is now racing into many massive problems, any one of which could bring about the collapse of civilization before long. The most serious are the destruction of the environment, the deprivation of the Third World, resource depletion, conflict and war, and the breakdown of social cohesion. The main cause of all these problems is over-production and over-consumption – people are trying to live at levels of affluence that are far too high to be sustained or for all to share.

Our society is grossly unsustainable – the levels of consumption, resource use and ecological impact we have in rich countries like Australia are far beyond levels that could be kept up for long or extended to all people. Yet almost everyone’s supreme goal is to increase material living standards and the GDP and production and consumption, investment, trade, etc., as fast as possible and without any limit in sight. There is no element in our suicidal condition that is more important than this mindless obsession with accelerating the main factor causing the condition.

The following points drive home the magnitude of the overshoot.

10 comments:

nanakwame said...

And fools want to run on rapid economic growth (like addicts), when at this time; the question of work and basic living wage is at core. Even the hero of these so-called conservatives raised it while he was a live. - Hayek 

umbrarchist said...

Until people realize the GDP is Grossly Distorted  Propaganda and the same as BS then it is a lost cause.

What kind of businessman doesn't know the difference between GROSS and NET?  So how do we let economists get away with it?  And then they get their NDP equation wrong.  If I didn't have to live on this planet I would find it hysterically funny.
.

CNu said...

In 2005, the US spent a trillion dollars on advertising! Imagine how much more now that corporations can spend all they want on elections!

"According to Blackfriars Communications, the United States in 2005 spent over $1 trillion on marketing in its various forms-representing about 9 percent of U.S. GDP. Retail industry was found to spend 12 percent of its revenue on advertising. In comparison, total spending on elementary and secondary education in the United States in 2004-05 was $536 billion, or only a little more than half of marketing expenditures." [p.52, WHAT EVERY ENVIRONMENTALIST NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT CAPITALISM]

Rembom said...

The linked article is well worth reading all the way through.  The author makes a compelling case for the unsustainability of our current economic system.  Question about his proposed alternative: how does his alternative society deal with rogue psychopaths intent on "getting ahead", regardless of consequences?

CNu said...

Jay Hanson addresses this consequence a bit more robustly in his America 2.0 scheme http://dieoff.org/america.htm

Personally, I'm more of a fan of the only demonstrated, zero growth, sustainable high-civilization - which was Edo period Japan. That samurai thing may be about the only practical way to harness and control the worst aspects of male killer-ape psychology.

Anonymous said...

fantastic points altogether, you simply received a emblem
new reader. What may you recommend in regards to
your post that you made some days in the past? Any certain?
My blog post : erinmore flake

Anonymous said...

You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but
I find this matter to be really something which I think I would never understand.
It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me.

I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!
My homepage : amphora tobacco

Anonymous said...

What's up, yeah this post is actually fastidious and I have learned lot of things from it about blogging. thanks.
Here is my web site - Van Nelle Tabak

Anonymous said...

Spot on with this write-up, I actually think this site needs much more attention.
I'll probably be returning to read more, thanks for the info!
Here is my web-site - used to

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure exactly why but this blog is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my end? I'll check back later and see if the problem still exists.
Feel free to visit my webpage : acne herbal medication