thehill | Although Barack Obama
is no longer president, the abuses that occurred within the FBI and
Justice Department under his watch already have the potential to eclipse
the Watergate scandal in their historic significance and damage done to
American government.
A
Beltway adage has it that “it’s always the cover-up that’ll get you,
not the original transgression.” Often, this proves to be true,
especially in the case of Nixon, but even more recently, given the
impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton, which were over perjury and obstruction of justice, not actual abuse of power with a 22-year-old intern.
However, with the recent declassification of the Nunes and Grassley
memos from the House and Senate, in this case the putative crimes are
far more serious than a failed attempt to bug the private office of a
political party. These crimes have the potential to shake American
confidence in otherwise prestigious institutions like the FBI, and the
sanctity of our constitutional rights as citizens, especially those
afforded by the Fourth Amendment, specifically protection “against
unreasonable searches and seizures” or warrants being issued without
“probable cause.”
Despite
the months it has taken for the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence and Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate the matters
before them and declassify their initial findings, we are still just at
the beginning of knowing how broad and deep a scandal we face.
Nevertheless, the facts already laid out by the memos are shocking
enough by themselves and, specifically, in the consequences they may
have for all Americans.
We
already know that during the 2016 presidential election, the FBI and
Justice Department acquired a secret warrant to spy on U.S. citizen
Carter Page, a volunteer adviser to the Trump campaign. The warrant
application was based on an “opposition research” file paid for by the
Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton
through her lawyer. This fact, that the file was paid for by the
candidate and party running against Donald Trump, was not disclosed by
the FBI or Justice Department to the secret FISA court judge to whom
that warrant application was made.
It
was also never disclosed that the author of the file was a former
British intelligence officer with close ties to Moscow, who had been
deemed by the FBI to be “unreliable” and who was known — at the highest
levels of the Justice Department — to be “desperate” to ensure that
Trump never became president. In other words, the FBI and Justice
Department knowingly hid exculpatory evidence from the surveillance
court in order to be able to start spying on a member of the Trump team.
Add
to this what we now know about the contents of the file compiled by
Christopher Steele, that its salacious accusations came from Russian
officials and, in part, as Trey Gowdy has intimated,
from none other than Sidney Blumenthal, the closest of Clinton’s
confidantes, and the full scenario appears undeniable. One candidate for
president managed to leverage elements of the federal law enforcement
and intelligence communities to illegally spy on the campaign running
against her.
If we add to
this the countless anti-Trump text messages that have been released
between key members of the FBI team investigating both the Clinton
“servergate” case and the accusations of “Russia collusion” by Trump
associates, and it is easy to understand why half a dozen senior FBI
agents and Justice Department officials have been “relieved” or
reassigned in recent weeks.
0 comments:
Post a Comment