technologyreview | It took Boeke and his team eight years before they were able to
publish their first fully artificial yeast chromosome. The project has
since accelerated. Last March, the next five synthetic yeast chromosomes
were described in a suite of papers in Science, and Boeke says
that all 16 chromosomes are now at least 80 percent done. These efforts
represent the largest amount of genetic material ever synthesized and
then joined together.
It helps that the yeast genome has proved remarkably resilient to
the team’s visions and revisions. “Probably the biggest headline here is
that you can torture the genome in a multitude of different ways, and
the yeast just laughs,” says Boeke.
Boeke and his colleagues aren’t simply replacing the natural yeast
genome with a synthetic one (“Just making a copy of it would be a
stunt,” says Church). Throughout the organism’s DNA they have also
placed molecular openings, like the invisible breaks in a magician’s
steel rings. These let them reshuffle the yeast chromosomes “like a deck
of cards,” as Cai puts it. The system is known as SCRaMbLE, for
“synthetic chromosome recombination and modification by LoxP-mediated
evolution.”
The result is high-speed, human-driven evolution: millions of new
yeast strains with different properties can be tested in the lab for
fitness and function in applications like, eventually, medicine and
industry. Mitchell predicts that in time, Sc2.0 will displace all the
ordinary yeast in scientific labs.
The ultimate legacy of Boeke’s project could be decided by what
genome gets synthesized next. The GP-write group originally imagined
that making a synthetic human genome would have the appeal of a “grand
challenge.” Some bioethicists disagreed and sharply criticized the plan.
Boeke emphasizes that the group will “not do a project aimed at making a
human with a synthetic genome.” That means no designer people.
Ethical considerations aside, synthesizing a full human
genome—which is over 250 times larger than the yeast genome—is
impractical with current methods. The effort to advance the technology
also lacks funding. Boeke’s yeast work has been funded by the National
Science Foundation and by academic institutions, including partners in
China, but the larger GP-write initiative has not attracted major
support, other than a $250,000 initial donation from the computer design
company Autodesk. Compare that with the Human Genome Project, which
enjoyed more than $3 billion in US funding.
0 comments:
Post a Comment