tomdispatch | Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz has said of the upcoming Concert for Valor:
“The post-9/11 years
have brought us the longest period of sustained warfare in our nation’s
history. The less than one percent of Americans who volunteered to
serve during this time have afforded the rest of us remarkable freedoms
-- but that freedom comes with a responsibility to understand their
sacrifice, to honor them, and to appreciate the skills and experience
they offer when they return home.”
It was crafty of Schultz to redirect that famed 1% label from the
ultra rich, represented by CEOs like him, onto our “heroes.” At the
concert, I hope Schultz has a chance to get more specific about those
“remarkable freedoms.” Will he mention that the U.S. has the highest per capita prison
population on the planet? Does he include among those remarkable
freedoms the guarantee that dogs, Tasers, tear gas, and riot police will
be sent after you if you stay out past dark protesting the killing of an unarmed Black teenager by a representative of this country’s increasingly militarized police? Will the freedom to be too big to fail and so to have the right to melt down the economy and walk away without going to prison -- as Jamie Dimon, the CEO of Chase, did -- be mentioned? Do these remarkable freedoms include having every American phone call and email recorded and stored away by the NSA?
And what about that term “hero”? Many veterans reject it, and not
just out of Gary Cooperesque modesty either. Most veterans who have seen
combat, watched babies get torn apart, or their comrades die in their
arms, or the most powerful army on Earth spend trillions of dollars
fighting some of the poorest people in the world for 13 years feel
anything but heroic. But that certainly doesn’t stop the use of the
term. So why do we use it? As journalist Cara Hoffman points out at Salon:
“‘[H]ero’ refers to a
character, a protagonist, something in fiction, not to a person, and
using this word can hurt the very people it’s meant to laud. While meant
to create a sense of honor, it can also buy silence, prevent discourse,
and benefit those in power more than those navigating the new terrain
of home after combat. If you are a hero, part of your character is stoic
sacrifice, silence. This makes it difficult for others to see you as
flawed, human, vulnerable, or exploited.”
We use the term hero in part because it makes us feel good and in
part because it shuts soldiers up (which, believe me, makes the rest of
us feel better). Labeled as a hero, it’s also hard to think twice about
putting your weapons down. Thank yous to heroes discourage dissent,
which is one reason military bureaucrats feed off the term.
There are American soldiers stationed around the globe who think
about filing conscientious objector status (as I once did), and I
sometimes hear from some of them. They often grasp the way in which the
militarized acts of imperial America are helping to create
the very enemies they are then being told to kill. They understand that
the trillions of dollars being wasted on war will never be spent on
education, health care, or the development of clean energy here at
home. They know that they are fighting for American control over the
flow of fossil fuels on this planet, the burning of which is warming our
world and threatening human existence.
0 comments:
Post a Comment