unz | The Washington Post and a number of
other mainstream media outlets are sensing blood in the water in the
wake of former CIA Director John Brennan’s public testimony before the
House Intelligence Committee. The Post headlined a front page featured
article with Brennan’s explosive testimony just made it harder for the GOP to protect Trump.
The article states that Brennan during the 2016 campaign “reviewed
intelligence that showed ‘contacts and interaction’ between Russian
actors and people associated with the Trump campaign.” Politico was also in on the chase in an article entitled Brennan: Russia may have successfully recruited Trump campaign aides.
The precise money quote
by Brennan that the two articles chiefly rely on is “I encountered and
am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and
interactions between Russian officials and US persons involved in the
Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian
efforts to suborn such individuals. It raised questions in my mind
whether or not Russia was able to gain the co-operation of those
individuals.”
Now
first of all, the CIA is not supposed to keep tabs on American citizens
and tracking the activities of known associates of a presidential
candidate should have sent warning bells off, yet Brennan clearly
persisted in following the trail. What Brennan did not describe, because
it was “classified,” was how he came upon the information in the first
place. We know from the New York Times and other sources that it came
from foreign intelligence services, including the British, Dutch and
Estonians, and there has to be a strong suspicion that the forwarding of
at least some of that information might have been sought or possibly
inspired by Brennan unofficially in the first place. But whatever the
provenance of the intelligence, it is clear that Brennan then used that
information to request an FBI investigation into a possible Russian
operation directed against potential key advisers if Trump were to
somehow get nominated and elected, which admittedly was a longshot at
the time. That is how Russiagate began.
0 comments:
Post a Comment