foreignpolicy | But instead of sulking, whining, or grabbing the mic from
Taylor Swift, Kendrick used his scheduled Grammy performance to make Imagine
Dragons, one of the year's top-selling rock bands, into his backup band and, well,
let Kendrick tell it: "I need you to recognize that Plan B is to win your
hearts right here while we're at the Grammys." And he did, with a triumphant, uncompromising
performance that brought down the house and momentarily made the Grammys
matter again. Instead of brooding over the ignorance of the gatekeepers,
Kendrick just seized the moment and went out and relegated them to irrelevance.
That's what academic bloggers have been doing for the last
decade: ignoring hierarchies and traditional venues and instead hustling on our
own terms. Instead of lamenting over the absence of an outlet for academics to
publish high-quality work, we wrote blogs on the things we cared about and
created venues like the Middle
East Channel and the Monkey Cage.
Academic blogs and new primarily online publications rapidly evolved into a
dense, noisy, and highly competitive ecosystem where established scholars,
rising young stars, and diverse voices battled and collaborated.
These new forms of public engagement, whether on personal
blogs or the Duck of Minerva or Political Violence or the
Monkey Cage or Foreign Policy or EzraStan
or the countless other outlets now available for online publication, are
exactly where
academics need to be if they want to fulfil their own educational,
policy, or research missions. Online
publishing actually reaches
people and informs public debates that matter. The marketplace of ideas is
intensely competitive, and if scholars want
their ideas to compete, then they need to get out there and compete.
This seems so obvious that it's sometimes hard to know what
thearguments are all about. Some of it is no doubt nostalgic anxiety for an
older, more regulated, hierarchical world, and some of it is driven by the
admittedly noxious nature of a lot of online commentary. The ISA's president,
Harvey Starr, defended the proposed policy as necessary to preserve
a "professional
environment"
in light of the kinds of discourse often found online. Many of the profession's
gatekeepers recoil from the public nature of the intellectual combat, as
well as from the invective, personal abuse, and intense stupidity that populate
most comment sections and the occasional Twitter feed.
But Kendrick Lamar, along with everything that produced him,
shows exactly why the ISA would be insane to try to block its membership from
blogging or engaging at all levels with the public sphere. It might as well try
to outlaw gravity or place restraints on the moon's orbit. If scholars want to
have impact on public policy debates -- and many don't, and that's fine -- then
there's really no option. You have to play the game to change the game.
Blogs and other online publications should be seen as the
equivalent of the mixtapes in the hip-hop world. Mixtapes emerged in hip-hop,
far more than in most other musical genres, as a way for rising artists to gain
attention, build a fan base, display their talents, and battle their rivals. Sometimes
they would be sold at shows or on websites, but more often they would be given
away for free on the Internet. Mixtapes would often feature tracks that weren't
quite ready for prime time or were recorded over somebody else's beat, but
demonstrated the quality and originality of the artist's vision.
Where the earlier generation of rappers found fame through
signing a deal and a major label release (the equivalent of getting a
tenure-track job straight out of grad school), mid-2000s monsters like 50 Cent
and Lil Wayne broke through with their mixtapes. The current generation of
stars followed in their paths: Drake, Wale, J. Cole, B.o.B, and company were
defined by, and arguably did their best work, not on their formulaic,
label-shaped albums but on their earlier creator-shaped mixtapes. But -- and
it's an important but -- they couldn't actually consolidate their careers
without the major-label deal. Academics need to understand the implications of
both dimensions of this new structure of the field: The road to a major-label
deal (tenure-track job) lies through the mixtapes (blogs), but career success
(tenure) still requires successful albums (books and journal articles).
13 comments:
The leverage and ROI of this attack are phenomenal. What I'm struggling with processing is how it takes a "group" 19 minutes to bust only 100 caps? Even at my advanced age, I could carry a few hundred rounds of 7.62x39 - do a two mile run in and a two mile exit run out (backpack substantially lightened) A lone shooter could easily do this work in under 5 minutes and with zero chance of information leakage.
So I'm scratching my head about this notion of a group and that it took a group 19 minutes to shoot up this substation. The downside of any group exercise is information leakage - so there must be yet more to come on this story?
Genes alone cannot explain eukaryotes. Just... can't. In fact, the evidence is, it happened only once. An optimistic answer to the Fermi Paradox perhaps. Prokaryotes simply don't have the oomph it takes for multicellular beings, and I'm betting that, no multicellular critters => no flying saucers. That would be some nice news for once. http://nautil.us/issue/10/mergers--acquisitions/the-unique-merger-that-made-you-and-ewe-and-yew
Even without taggants, explosives are a whole lot easier to trace than ammo. 7.62x39 is sold at gun shows by the barrel - originating from anywhere around the world. You could be sitting on an untraceable stockpile of czech ammo from 10 years ago still perfectly up to this task, and the low cost at the time of purchase would've been negligible. It would take a substantial amount of kaboom and comparatively high risk to plant and detonate it (they put cameras and other sensors on substations and other SCADA infrastructure nowadays)
Sitting comfortably concealed three football fields away with engine-block piercing muzzle velocity is a helluva lot better proposition for doing dirt to vulnerable infrastructure than kaboom. Now you talk about your crime scenarios, it's been made fairly common knowledge - by this story alone - that a whole lot of malicious mischief can be wreaked for a few dollars and with minimum risk of detection or leaving evidence.
lol, dood you slippin? How you go and manage to leave depreciation out of your argument?
sssshhhhh...., now John. We gotta maintain a united front in the presence of the creation scientists.Multicellular blue-green algae made the transition from single-celled to
multi-celled not once, but several times over the course of history,
according to a study published last week (February 14) in BMC
Evolutionary Biology, giving support to the idea that the evolution of
multicellularity may not have been as big of an evolutionary leap as
scientists once believed.http://subrealism.blogspot.com/2011/03/multicellular-evolution-not-linear.html
lol, you may wanna google parasitism and watch all the Alien movies before associating symbiogenesis and kumbayah...,
Man, the immigrants are coming. Chua's trying to help these simple ass critics. The immigrants are looking to run shit since Americans don't have the goddamn sense to handle their own business. The easier way to break it down is that American outliers are the norm among certain groups. I believe Chua's book was for those parents that didn't go to Ivy League schools. She's being socially responsible. It might be that some critics are protecting their turf. They sound so weak. How the fuck do you think people succeed? It sounds like the triple threat could be better described as vision, focus, and determination with a feeling that one hasn't quite made it yet. Now why is that such a problem and how is it racist? It looks like the Cathedral wants to stay a gang of whiney bitches. I say fuck 'em and take their lunch money.
I'm starting to like the Cathedral idea. It works better than calling them the left.
The immigrants are looking to run shit since Americans don't have the goddamn sense to handle their own business.
Yeah. We take pride in not having the sense to pour piss out of our own shoes.
Ah, I see the distinction you're drawing. The distinction between parasite and symbiont is a very fine one and I suspect that for every symbiotic equilibrium/evolutionary leap achieved, there are literally thousands of purely predatory parasitic failures. It takes an immensely strong host to overcome the onslaught of a parasite. Take for example the peculiar history of America. The native Americans have not fared particularly well in the face of repeated european onslaughts. Africans, captured and kidnapped for the purpose of pure plantation parasitism - on the other hand..., nevermind, I can hear BD snoring peacefully and dreaming of a Wewelsburg Christmas
Thanks Vic, I couldn't have asked for a better segue into the next ripple in my stream of consciousness given the presence of Janet Mock on that MHP/MSNBC stage.
"The downside of any group exercise is information leakage." Unless they are similar to the team that broke into the Pa. FBI office.
The downside of any group exercise is information leakage - so there must be yet more to come on this story?
You did say things are getting Dickensian...
“It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known.”
You mean Depreciation is not implied in Net Worth? LOL
Post a Comment