NYTimes | We
take as our text today the parable of the prodigal son. As I hope you
know, the story is about a father with two sons. The younger son took
his share of the inheritance early and blew it on prostitutes and
riotous living. When the money was gone, he returned home.
His
father ran out and embraced him. The delighted father offered the boy
his finest robe and threw a feast in his honor. The older son, the
responsible one, was appalled. He stood outside the feast, crying in
effect, “Look! All these years I’ve been working hard and obeying you
faithfully, and you never gave me special treatment such as this!”
The
father responded, “You are always with me, and everything I have is
yours.” But he had to celebrate the younger one’s return. The boy was
lost and now is found.
Did the father do the right thing? Is the father the right model for authority today?
The father’s critics say he was unjust. People who play by the rules
should see the rewards. Those who abandon the community, live according
to their own reckless desires should not get to come back and
automatically reap the bounty of others’ hard work. If you reward the
younger brother, you signal that self-indulgence pays, while hard work
gets slighted.
The
father’s example is especially pernicious now, the critics continue.
Jesus preached it at the time of the Pharisees, in an overly rigid and
rule-bound society. In those circumstances, a story of radical
forgiveness was a useful antidote to the prevailing legalism.
But
we don’t live in that kind of society. We live in a society in which
moral standards are already fuzzy, in which people are already
encouraged to do their own thing. We live in a society with advanced
social decay — with teens dropping out of high school, financiers
plundering companies and kids being raised without fathers. The father’s
example in the parable reinforces loose self-indulgence at a time when
we need more rule-following, more social discipline and more
accountability, not less.
It’s
a valid critique, but I’d defend the father’s example, and, informed by
a reading of Timothy Keller’s outstanding book “The Prodigal God,” I’d
even apply the father’s wisdom to social policy-making today.
We
live in a divided society in which many of us in the middle- and
upper-middle classes are like the older brother and many of the people
who drop out of school, commit crimes and abandon their children are
like the younger brother. In many cases, we have a governing class of
elder brothers legislating programs on behalf of the younger brothers.
The great danger in this situation is that we in the elder brother class
will end up self-righteously lecturing the poor: “You need to be more
like us: graduate from school, practice a little sexual discipline, work
harder.”
But the father in this parable exposes the truth that people in the
elder brother class are stained, too. The elder brother is
self-righteous, smug, cold and shrewd. The elder brother wasn’t really
working to honor his father; he was working for material reward and out
of a fear-based moralism. The father reminds us of the old truth that
the line between good and evil doesn’t run between people or classes; it
runs straight through every human heart.
