guardian | The celebrated physicist Stephen Hawking became embroiled in a deepening furore today over his decision to boycott a prestigious conference in Israel in protest over the state's occupation of Palestine.
Hawking,
a world-renowned scientist and bestselling author who has had motor
neurone disease for 50 years, cancelled his appearance at the
high-profile Presidential Conference, which is personally sponsored by
Israel's president, Shimon Peres, after a barrage of appeals from
Palestinian academics.
The move, denounced by prominent Israelis
and welcomed by pro-Palestinian campaigners, entangled Cambridge
University – Hawking's academic base since 1975 – which initially
claimed the scientist's withdrawal was on medical grounds, before
conceding a political motivation.
The university's volte-face came
after the Guardian presented it with the text of a letter sent from
Hawking to the organisers of the high-profile conference in Jerusalem,
clearly stating that he was withdrawing from the conference in order to
respect the call for a boycott by Palestinian academics.
The full
text of the letter, dated 3 May, said: "I accepted the invitation to the
Presidential Conference with the intention that this would not only
allow me to express my opinion on the prospects for a peace settlement
but also because it would allow me to lecture on the West Bank. However,
I have received a number of emails from Palestinian academics. They are
unanimous that I should respect the boycott. In view of this, I must
withdraw from the conference. Had I attended, I would have stated my
opinion that the policy of the present Israeli government is likely to
lead to disaster."
Hawking's decision to throw his weight behind
the academic boycott of Israel met with an angry response from the
organisers of the Presidential Conference, an annual event hosted by
Israeli president Shimon Peres.
"The academic boycott against
Israel is in our view outrageous and improper, certainly for someone for
whom the spirit of liberty lies at the basis of his human and academic
mission," said conference chairman Israel Maimon. "Israel is a democracy
in which all individuals are free to express their opinions, whatever
they may be. The imposition of a boycott is incompatible with open,
democratic dialogue."
Daniel Taub, the Israeli ambassador to
London, said: "It is a great shame that Professor Hawking has withdrawn
from the president's conference … Rather than caving into pressure from
political extremists, active participation in such events is a far more
constructive way to promote progress and peace."
The Wolf
Foundation, which awarded Hawking the Wolf prize in physics in 1988,
said it was "sad to learn that someone of Professor Hawking's standing
chose to capitulate to irrelevant pressures and will refrain from
visiting Israel".
But Palestinians welcomed Hawking's decision.
"Palestinians deeply appreciate Stephen Hawking's support for an
academic boycott of Israel," said Omar Barghouti, a founding member of
the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement. "We think this will
rekindle the kind of interest among international academics in academic
boycotts that was present in the struggle against apartheid in South
Africa."
0 comments:
Post a Comment