medium | In
an ironic — and entirely predictable — twist, police officers in city
after city responded to the demonstrations against their brutality with
yet more violence.
Cop cars in Brooklyn mowed down crowds of protestors. The National Guard in Minneapolis shot paint canisters at residents standing on their own porches. A Pennsylvania officer was filmed kicking a teenager who was already sitting on the ground, her hands covering her face. An officer in Utah knocked over an elderly man walking with a cane. And across the country, officers shot journalists with rubber bullets (once on live TV), arrested reporters, and pepper-sprayed members of the press, even as they clearly identified themselves as working journalists.
With
each new video shared on social media, it became increasingly clear
that police officers were the ones escalating the violence. Their
attacks on civilians were not made in self-defense or because they were
needed to maintain order — police hurt people because they wanted to.
In response, conservatives bemoaned property destruction and theft — the president even tweeted that “looters” should be shot
— as if broken windows or stolen clothing could compare to the
thousands of lives lost to police violence. This focus is not
accidental: By painting mostly peaceful protestors as criminals, those
on the right hope it will provide cover for — and distract from — the
unchecked thuggery of police officers across the U.S.
But
there is no “both sides” argument to be made here. Police officers,
armed and armored, act with the power of the state behind them.
Protestors have no such power. Cops are tasked with protecting the
community and de-escalating tensions. Protesters have no such
responsibility. To act as if this is a fight between equals is
ridiculous.
0 comments:
Post a Comment