urbanfaith | In the Black Church it is popular to give leaders a free pass.
Usually when someone dares to speak out against someone in ministry they
are quick to hear “Touch not mine anointed” or “Don’t put your mouth on
the man of God.” The idea is that God calls the preacher/pastor and
therefore he is answerable only to God. Therefore there is no
accountability between him/her and the congregation or other pastors.
Having been in the pastor role myself I believe that we should give
pastors the respect they deserve because it is a tiresome and demanding
job to shepherd a faith community. At the same time, I think that when
the pastor breaks some of the standards for a Christian leader outlined
in the New Testament (1 Timothy 3:1-7, Titus 1:5-9) someone should call
them to account for their actions.
But is it right for a pastor to let another pastor know when they are
out of line? Is it right for church members to correct their pastor?
Based on scriptural principles and examples the answer to both questions
is an emphatic “Yes!” In regard to church members calling their leaders
to account we can examine 1 Timothy 5:19-20.
Here Paul lets Timothy know that he is not to receive an accusation
against an elder unless two or three witnesses can support it. By
stating how these accusations are to be received these verses assume
that accusations can be brought against an elder or church leader.
In regard to pastors calling other pastors to account Paul provides
an excellent example. When Peter shows prejudice against the Gentiles at
Antioch, Paul rebukes him to his face Galatians 2:11-12.
Paul went in on Peter in front of everyone! Paul was also vocal in
calling out false teachers. He warns Timothy not to follow in the
footsteps of Hymenaeus and Alexander in regards to his Christian faith 1 Timothy 1:19-20. Notice that he calls them out by name. Paul also calls out Hymenaeus and Philetus in 2 Timothy 2:17-18.
When leaders are out of line other leaders need to publicly let them
know. When leaders are out of line their followers need to let them
know. One thing that needs to be taken into consideration is whether
the preachers have been given the opportunity to change. The site warns
others of their faults and sins but is there a way to offer grace and
restore these fallen pastors.
Another thing that we do not know is whether the church members have
already addressed these issues with the pastor according to Matthew 18:15-17.
Pimppreacher.com has taken it upon themselves to be an advocate for
those who feel abused by their pastor but have the members themselves
done the biblical thing and talked it out with the offenders. This would
be the best way to handle these situations.
What do you think? Should pastors be held accountable by other
pastors? Should pastors be held accountable by other members? Is a site
like pimppreacher.com necessary?
0 comments:
Post a Comment