strategic-culture | The AP headlined on July 27th "#MeToo reaches Vatican as nuns denounce abuse from priests” and reported that the Vatican has continued to tolerate rape by its priests, and: Revelations
that a prominent US cardinal sexually abused and harassed his adult
seminarians have exposed an egregious abuse of power that has shocked
Catholics on both sides of the Atlantic. But the Vatican has long been
aware of its heterosexual equivalent — the sexual abuse of nuns by
priests and bishops — and done little to stop it, an Associated Press
analysis has found.
More
people receive their morality from the Roman Catholic Church than from
any other (or from any scientific basis); and, so, it is remarkable that
this sort of exploitation is allowed to continue on, for decade after
decade, and the pews not to be emptied-out by these and other ongoing
church-scandals. However, if those congregants will then go to different
denominations, will the results be any different? Many, if not most,
faiths (especially the most conservative ones) have been revealed to be
equally exploitative and tolerant of exploitation. Obviously, the
problem here isn’t only the Roman Catholic Church. It goes far deeper
than that. Throwing stones from glass houses against glass houses can’t
help anyone but will only make things worse for everybody. The problem
here is the supremacist culture, which exists everywhere, and which
oppresses everywhere.
It
is reflected in the politics of every nation; and it
is especially reflected in the essentially lawless “Wild West” that
constitutes the relations between nations — the field where wars and
mass-killing, and military invasions and occupations, occur and are
accepted by the perpetrator-countries, the invading and occupying
nations, as if there were some sort of ‘right’ to perpetrate such
things, for example, as was the invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003
on the part of the invading and occupying nations.
The
deeper problem is that there is no right by anyone to invade anywhere.
There is no right that any clergy-person has to deceive or violently to
force any person to do anything, and there also is no right that any
nation has to rape another.
My July 19th article, “Vladimir Putin’s Basic Disagreement with The West” presented
that “disagreement” as being between Putin’s commitment to the idea
that only the residents in a given land-area can ever rightfully have
sovereignty there, versus The West’s commitment to the idea that
foreigners can have a right — maybe even a higher right — to sovereignty
over that land.
Two
representatives of the view that controls in The West were quoted
there, at length, in defense of the asserted right of foreigners to
control a government: Cecil Rhodes during the 1800s, and George Soros during the 21st Century.
0 comments:
Post a Comment