RollingStone | A year removed from the Women's March, a lot has changed. Around the
country, events marking the one year anniversary of the protests are
focused on channeling their energy into political organizing. But the
movement is more fractured than ever. Even the name – Women’s March –
has become a bitter point of contention between the women who were the
public face of last year's march in D.C. — Tamika Mallory, Linda
Sarsour, Bob Bland, Carmen Perez — and the organizers of sister marches
around the country and the world.
A number of marches across the
United States have received letters from Women's March Inc., protesting
their use of the term "women’s march." As the New York Times reported
earlier this week, Amber Selman-Lynn, a Mobile, Alabama-based
organizer, received a letter from Women's March, Inc. requesting the
name be removed from materials promoting the march. The letter said that
while the group was "supportive of any efforts to build our collective
power as women," they would prefer Selman-Lynn "not advertise your event
as a ‘Women's March' action." At issue was Selman-Lynn's use of the
slogan, "March on the Polls," created by another group with a similar
agenda, March On, in her material. (She removed the name and had them
re-printed.)
Many of the organizers of last year's local marches
have chosen to incorporate independently – New York's march is being
organized by Women's March Alliance, Corp.; Philadelphia’s by Philly
Women Rally, Inc. – and some have chosen to affiliate with March On, an
umbrella group that sprung up with the express purpose of connecting
sister marches after last year's worldwide protest.
Part of the
problem, according to Carolyn Jasik, a pediatrician new to activism who
helped organize Women's Marches across California last year, is the fact
that Women's March Inc. have empowered state coordinators who organized
transport from states to the flagship march in D.C., rather than the
local activists who organized events in their own communities.
"The
local city leads have the best inroads into the community. So if boots
on the ground were needed for an action, the city organizers were a lot
more equipped to make that happen," Jasik says. After the march, as
local groups were primed to get to work right away on issues in their
communities, the national organization was still working to formalize a
structure and acquire nonprofit status. "These first-time activist
leaders needed urgent help with practical matters like legal advice on
how to form a non-profit, website support, mailing list management,
funding [and] merchandise."
0 comments:
Post a Comment