BostonGlobe | The memo, which was made available to all members of the House, is
said to contend that officials from the two agencies were not
forthcoming to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge.
Republicans
accuse the agencies of failing to disclose that the Democratic National
Committee and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign helped finance
research that was used to obtain a warrant for surveillance of Carter
Page, a Trump campaign adviser. The research presented to the judge was
assembled by a former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele.
The
memo is not limited to actions taken by the Obama administration,
though. The New York Times reported Sunday that the memo reveals that
Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, a top Trump appointee, signed
off an application to extend the surveillance of Page shortly after
taking office last spring.
The renewal shows that the Justice Department under Trump saw reason to believe Page was acting as a Russian agent.
The inclusion of Rosenstein’s action in the memo could expose him to
criticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from conservatives in the
media who have seized on the surveillance to argue that the Russia
inquiry may have been tainted from the start.
Rosenstein is
overseeing that investigation because Attorney General Jeff Sessions
recused himself. It was Rosenstein who appointed Robert Mueller as
special counsel.
People familiar with the underlying application
have portrayed the Republican memo as misleading in part because
Steele’s information was insufficient to meet the standard for a FISA
warrant.
They said the application drew on other intelligence
material that the Republican memo selectively omits. That other
information remains highly sensitive, and releasing it would risk
burning other sources and methods of intelligence-gathering about
Russia.
There is no known precedent for the Republicans’ action. Though House
rules allow the Intelligence Committee to vote to disclose classified
information if it is deemed to be in the public interest, the rule is
not thought to have ever been used.
Typically, lawmakers wishing
to make public secretive information classified by the executive branch
spend months, if not years, fighting with the White House and the
intelligence community over what they can release.
0 comments:
Post a Comment