bostonglobe | While most of us were ignoring the long
anti-elite crusade that began as a cynical attempt to paint opposing
politicians as arrogant East Coast dilettantes, it morphed into a far
more dangerous jihad against expertise at any level of government. To
put it in Gilligan’s Island terms, they have taken the Professor and repackaged him as Thurston Howell III.
That
helps explain Trump’s response to Vladimir Putin’s expulsion this
summer of hundreds of American diplomats and embassy staff from Russia.
Bizarrely, the American president thanked the Russian dictator, saying
these professionals aren’t needed anyway and the expulsion will save the
United States money. (Wrong on both counts. Career foreign-service
officers are entitled by law to reassignment.) Yet somehow Trump faced
absolutely no blowback from a Republican Party that historically viewed
Russia as America’s most dangerous foe. Maybe the diplomats don’t like
cheeseburgers.
Of course, the establishment
elites are not blameless. Over the years, many of them made confident
predictions, about everything from free trade agreements to Middle East
strategy, that turned out to be disastrously wrong. After all, it wasn’t
just Trump who brilliantly tapped into anti-elite sentiment in the 2016
campaign and turned it into electoral success. So did Bernie Sanders, a
septuagenarian socialist who managed to win 23 primaries and caucuses
and 13.2 million votes.
Still, we have
reached a dangerous point when an administration whose party controls
the White House, both houses of Congress, and two-thirds of the state
legislatures can scapegoat thousands of highly experienced government
scientists, diplomats, and intelligence specialists, tossing them all
into a basket of deplored elites.
It’s time to wage a new war in defense of expertise in government. And if it’s too late to prevent the word elite from being used as a weapon, it’s time to embrace it and redefine it as something good.
0 comments:
Post a Comment