globalresearch | Weather warfare technology was the teeth “sustainable
development” Agenda 2030 had been waiting for (and surely why developing
nations had valiantly attempted to include an International Tribunal of
Climate Justice). Immediately after the two conferences, the Dutch
Defence Joint Meteorological Group (JMG) took the lead “in providing
weather forecasts for every exercise or deployment of [NATO’s] Very High
Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF).” [20] And if you think the VJTF is
only “forecasting” weather …
To be fair, some academics do ponder the naked emperor. How exactly
is CO2 to be removed from the atmosphere “using an infrastructure we
don’t have and with technology that won’t work on the scale we need, and
finally to store it in places we can’t find” [21]? Others recognize that the carbon solution is a ploy for raking in disaster capitalist cash:
$90 trillion in energy infrastructure investments, $1 trillion green
bond market, multi-trillion dollar carbon trading market, $391 billion
climate finance industry. [22] The UN Green Climate Fund alone will clear
$100 billion per year, purportedly to support concrete carbons
mitigation in developing countries. Should we take bets on if the money
will ever make it to the developing countries after being filtered
through multilateral and private banks like World Bank and Deutsche
Bank? After all, the naked emperor is not known for keeping his
promises.
Traditional bureaucratic foundations like Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie were said to be giving way to “philanthrocapitalism,” a muscular new approach to charity in which the presumed entrepreneurial skills of billionaires would be applied to the world’s most pressing challenges … [23]
Too late, the public is awakening to the dismal fact that its
institutions, agencies, universities, laboratories, and courts obey the
very powers that have milked public assets dry. Worker and food safety,
gone. Bill of Rights, gone. Environmental protections, gone. Soon, the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Trade and Investment
Partnership (TTIP) or facsimiles thereof will lock in corporate
feudalism under an oligarchic world rule. Billionaire members of the
Good Club [24] are establishing “brain institutes” to support the Brain
Initiative and its neuroscientists in service to a Transhumanist future.
[25]
“Science is broken”
For two decades, independent scientists and the science-minded have
been attempting to sound the alarm regarding what is going on in our
skies and in low-earth orbit while university labs and
burgeoning university scientists buckle to military grants dedicated to
weaponizing everything under the Sun, if not the Sun itself. Rutgers
University climatologist Alan Robock relates how CIA-funded consultants
contacted him to ask two questions: If we control someone else’s climate, would they know about it? and Would climate experts be able to determine if another nation was attempting to control the climate?
The CIA—not exactly known for being forthcoming—has funded multiple
grants targeting weather domination (including HAARP via minions like
Raytheon), including two February 2015 National Academy of Sciences
reports: “Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable
Sequestration” (154 pages) and “Climate Intervention: Reflecting
Sunlight to Cool Earth” (234 pages). [26]
The peer review system has been co-opted, favoring
some theories and scientists and banishing others to the outer darkness
of non-publication and stonewalled careers. Nobel Laureate biologist
Sydney Brenner:
I think peer review is hindering science. In fact, I think it has become a completely corrupt system. It’s corrupt in many ways, in that scientists and academics have handed over to the editors of these journals the ability to make judgment on science and scientists. There are universities in America, and I’ve heard from many committees, that won’t consider people’s publications in low impact factor journals … it puts the judgment in the hands of people who really have no reason to exercise judgment at all. And that’s all been done in the aid of commerce, because they are now giant organizations making money out of it. [27]
“Powerful orthodoxy against a marginalized heterodoxy” is how Charles
Eisenstein describes the opposition to cutting-edge Electric Universe
scientists:
If you have faith in the soundness of our scientific institutions, you will assume that the dissidents are marginalized for very good reason: their work is substandard. If you believe that the peer review process is fair and open, then the dearth of peer-reviewed citations for [Electric Universe] research is a damning indictment of their theory. And if you believe that the corpus of mainstream physics is fundamentally correct, and that science is progressing closer and closer to truth, you will be highly skeptical of any major departure from standard theories … Can we trust scientific consensus? Can we trust the integrity of our scientific institutions? Perhaps not. Over the last few years, a growing chorus of insider critics have been exposing serious flaws in the ways that scientific research is funded and published, leading some to go so far as to say, ‘Science is broken.’ [28]
Between 1973 and 2013, the decision-making as to which scientific
papers merited publication and which didn’t was controlled by six major
publishers (ACS; Reed Elsevier; Sage; Taylor & Francis; Springer;
and Wiley-Blackwell), all in the back pocket of Big Pharma and the
medical industry:
’As long as publishing in high impact factor journals is a requirement for researchers to obtain positions, research funding, and recognition from peers, the major commercial publishers will maintain their hold on the academic publishing system,’ added [Professor Vincent Lariviere, lead author of the study from the University of Montreal’s School of Library and Information Science]. [29]Then there’s the danger quotient far beyond loss of career for scientists working on classified projects. In the early days of the “Star Wars” Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) now culminating in the Space Fence, two dozen scientists and experts working for Marconi and Plessey Defence Systems either disappeared or died under “mysterious circumstances.” Most were microbiologists.
