p2pfoundation | I know this has been a rough time for a
lot of you, and I hope you are doing well. In brief: Yes, there has been
a major electoral upheaval, and it seems there are many confused people
out there working under some pretty strange assumptions. But no, this
isn’t as much of a shift as it may seem.
If
anything, this is the legacy of the 20th Century coming back to haunt
us. In an effort to counter the propaganda of our political enemies,
American social scientists (Bateson and Meade, to be exact) proposed a
world of screens they called “the surround.” Their idea was that if
people had the experience of choosing different things – or of looking
at whichever screen they wanted to – they wouldn’t care so much that all
the choices were for essentially the same thing.
In
short, looking at a screen – any screen – was more important than what a
person learned or came to believe, other than that he or she was
experiencing real autonomy and choice. That was supposed to be America:
the land of choices. The supermarket offers us fifty different laundry
detergents to choose from – even though they are almost all the same,
and are distributed by the same two or three corporations. You can
choose whichever one you want, as long as you choose (and pay for) one
of them.
An array of TV channels gave us a similar
experience of choice. But Bateson and Meade probably never imagined a
world with quite as many screens as ours now has. Or as much of a direct
connection between our experience of screen choice and that of
democracy. American Idol and other reality programs made the connection
discrete. And thus Donald Trump’s migration from reality TV to electoral
politics was seamless. Social media and smart phones took screens to
the next level of illusory user-control, while they simply reduced the
array of possibilities to a narrow beam of sensationalist,
algorithmically assembled, self-affirmation.
But the underlying techniques for influencing people through
all those screens? That’s magic. Or at least the approach to magic
practiced by Hitler and his propagandists in WWII, before it was
utilized by the British and American advertising agencies after the war.
It’s the subject of the graphic novel I released last week – Aleister & Adolf –
about the occult war between Aleister Crowley and Adolf Hitler at the
end of WWII. I hadn’t meant it to be quite so prescient, but it’s a
great way of understanding how we got where we are. The social media
landscape is the ideal space for sigils and memetic engineering because
we are utterly untethered from grounded experience. Those who succeed at
these techniques are the ones who successfully tap into existing hidden
agendas in popular culture. They just jump into the unacknowledged
standing wave of society, and it carries them along for the ride. It’s
not the subject or surfer that matters so much as the wave itself, and one’s willingness to surrender to it entirely. That’s
why celebrities or candidates who adopt this strategy end up seeming to
have no coherent goal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment