antiwar | So what is going on here?
When Trump supporters opined
that the “Deep State” would never
allow the populist real estate mogul to take office, I was skeptical. This
seemed to me like a made-for-television movie script rather than a real possibility:
after all, what could they actually do, aside from using force to prevent him
from taking the oath of office?
However, as the campaign progressed, and the Clintonites became
progressively more unhinged in their attacks on Trump, the Russian angle became
more prominent: former acting CIA Director Mike Morell’s accusation
that Trump is an “unconscious agent” of the Kremlin, and “not
a patriot,” seemed over the top at the time, but in retrospect looks more
like it was laying the groundwork for the current CIA-driven propaganda campaign.
But why would the CIA, in particular, have a special aversion
to Trump? Marcy Wheeler, whose analytical abilities I respect despite our political
disagreements, has this
to say:
“First, if Trump comes into office
on the current trajectory, the US will let Russia help Bashar al-Assad stay
in power, thwarting a 4-year effort on the part of the Saudis to remove
him from power. It will also restructure the hierarchy of horrible human rights
abusing allies the US has, with the Saudis losing out to other human rights
abusers, potentially up to and including that other petrostate, Russia. It will
also install a ton of people with ties to the US oil industry in the cabinet,
meaning the US will effectively subsidize oil production in this country, which
will have the perhaps inadvertent result of ensuring the US remains oil-independent
even though the market can’t justify fracking right now.
“The CIA is institutionally quite close with the Saudis right now, and has
been in charge of their covert war against Assad.”
The Saudis, having given
millions to the Clinton Foundation, along with their Gulf state allies,
were counting on a Clinton victory. The CIA has a longstanding relationship
with Riyadh, and together they have been working assiduously to not only overthrow
Assad in Syria but to forge a “moderate” Sunni alliance that will effectively
police the region while establishing the Saudis as the regional hegemon. This
was the Clintonian strategy while Hillary was at the helm of Foggy Bottom: Libya,
Syria, the alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, are all examples of
this utterly disastrous “Sunni turn.”
Trump represents a threat to this grand design, and therefore has to be stopped
by whatever means necessary. His desire to “get along with Russia,” his opposition
to regime change in Syria, his critique of the Libyan misadventure, his foreign
policy stance in general – all this meant that he would come to power and “drain
the swamp” of the CIA and the State Department.
The irony here is that the accusation leveled
at Trump – that his historic victory represents a successful attempt by a foreign
power to take control of the White House – is a classic case of projection.
What we are witnessing is a joint CIA-Saudi operation to overthrow the duly
elected President of the United States.
0 comments:
Post a Comment