unz | When Putin came to power he inherited a Kremlin every bit as corrupt
and traitor-infested as the White House nowadays. As for Russia, she was
in pretty much the same sorry shape as the Independent Nazi-run
Ukraine. Russia was also run by bankers and AngloZionist puppets and
most Russians led miserable lives. The big difference is that, unlike
what is happening with Trump, the Russian version of the US Neocons
never saw the danger coming from Putin. He was selected by the ruling
elites as the representative of the security services to serve along a
representative of the big corporate money, Medvedev. This was a
compromise solution between the only two parts of the Russian society
which were still functioning, the security services and oil/gas money.
Putin looked like a petty bureaucrat in an ill fitting suit, a shy and
somewhat awkward little guy who would present no threat to the powerful
oligarchs of the semibankirshchina
(the Seven Bankers) running Russia. Except that he turned out to be one
of the most formidable rulers in Russia history. Here is what Putin did
as soon as he came to power:
First, he re-established the credibility of the Kremlin with the
armed forces and security services by rapidly and effectively crushing
the Wahabi insurgency in Chechnia. This established his personal
credibility with the people he would have to rely on to deal with the
oligarchs.
Second, he used the fact that everybody, every single businessman and
corporation in Russia, did more or less break the law during the 1990s,
if only because there really was no law. Instead of cracking down on
the likes of Berezovski or Khodorkovski for their political activities,
he crushed them with (absolutely true) charges of corruption. Crucially,
he did that very publicly, sending a clear message to the other
arch-enemy: the media.
Third, contrary to the hallucinations of the western human rights
agencies and Russian liberals, Putin never directly suppressed any
dissent, or cracked down on the media or, even less so, ordered the
murder of anybody. He did something much smarter. Remember that modern
journalists are first and foremost presstitutes, right? By mercilessly
cracking down on the oligarchs Putin deprived the presstitutes of their
source of income and political support. Some emigrated to the Ukraine,
others simply resigned, and a few were left like on a reservation or a
zoo on a few very clearly identifiable media outlets such as Dozhd TV, Ekho Moskvy Radio or the newspaper Kommersant.
Those who emigrated became irrelevant, as for those who stayed in the
“liberal zoo” – they were harmless has they had no credibility left.
Crucially, everybody else “got the message”. After that, all it took is
the appointment a few real patriots (such as Dmitri Kiselev, Margarita
Simonian and others) in key positions and everybody quickly understood
that the winds of fortune had now turned.
Fourth, once the main media outlets were returned back to sanity it
did not take too long for the “liberal” (in the Russian sense, meaning
pro-USA) parties to enter into a death-spiral from which they have never
recovered. That, in turn, resulted in the ejection of all “liberals”
form the Duma which now has only 4 parties, all of them more or less
“patriotic”.
That’s the part that worked.
So far, Putin failed to eject the 5th columnists, whom I call the
“Atlantic Integrationists” (for details, including their names, see here) from the government itself.. Even the notorious Alexei Kudrin was not fired by Putin, but by Medvedev. The security services succeeded in finally getting rid of Anatolii Serdyukov but they did not have power needed to put him in jail. I still think that a purge will happen while Alexander Mercouris disagrees.
Whatever may be the case, what is certain is that Putin has not tackled
the 5th columnists in the banking/finance sector and that the latter
have been very careful not to give him a pretext to take action against
them.
Russia and the USA are very different countries, and no recipe can
simply be copied from one to another. Still, there are valuable lessons
from the “Putin model” for Trump, not the least of which that his most
formidable enemies probably are sitting in the Fed. One Russian analyst –
Rostislav Ishchenko – has suggested that Trump could somehow force the
Fed to increase interest rates, which would result in a bankruptcy
domino effect for US banks which might be the only way to finally crush
the Fed and re-take control of US banking. Maybe. I honestly am not
qualified to have an opinion about that.
0 comments:
Post a Comment